Judges: Brian H. Corcoran
Filed: Dec. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1464V Filed: October 30, 2019 UNPUBLISHED HEIDI LEVISEE, Petitioner, v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Damages Decision Based on Proffer; SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder HUMAN SERVICES, Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Respondent. Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. Alexis B. Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECIS
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 18-1464V Filed: October 30, 2019 UNPUBLISHED HEIDI LEVISEE, Petitioner, v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Damages Decision Based on Proffer; SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder HUMAN SERVICES, Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Respondent. Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. Alexis B. Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISI..
More
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 18-1464V
Filed: October 30, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
HEIDI LEVISEE,
Petitioner,
v. Special Processing Unit (SPU);
Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder
HUMAN SERVICES, Injury Related to Vaccine
Administration (SIRVA)
Respondent.
Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
Alexis B. Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
Corcoran, Chief Special Master:
On September 24, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to
vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination received
on October 10, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing
Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On August 27, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled
to compensation for her SIRVA. On October 29, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on
award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $126,283.01
(comprised of $125,000.00 for pain and suffering and $1,283.01 for past lost wages).
1I intend to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the
decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule
18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of
which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified
material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished
decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United
States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C.
§ 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012).
Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the
proffered award.
Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that petitioner is entitled to
an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner a lump
sum payment of $126,283.01 (comprised of $125,000.00 for pain and suffering and
$1,283.01 for past lost wages) in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Heidi
Levisee. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be
available under § 15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
HEIDI LEVISEE, )
)
Petitioner, )
v. ) No. 18-1464V
) Chief Special Master Corcoran
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) ECF
SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
I. Items of Compensation
On August 26, 2019, respondent conceded that entitlement to compensation was
appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. On the same day, former Chief Special Master
Dorsey issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine
compensation for her Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result
of a flu vaccination administered on October 13, 2016. Based upon the evidence of record,
respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $126,283.01. The award is comprised of
the following: $125,000.00 for pain and suffering, and $1,283.01 for past lost wages. This
amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42
U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through
a lump sum payment of $126,283.01, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 1 Petitioner
agrees.
Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.
Respectfully submitted,
JOSEPH H. HUNT
Assistant Attorney General
C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
Acting Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
CATHARINE E. REEVES
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
HEATHER L. PEARLMAN
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
s/ Alexis B. Babcock
ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
Assistant Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Telephone: (202) 616-7678
Dated: October 29, 2019
1
Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings
and future pain and suffering.