In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                  OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 18-1831V
                                         UNPUBLISHED


    JADYN ROYLANCE,                                           Chief Special Master Corcoran

                         Petitioner,                          Filed: February 25, 2020
    v.
                                                              Special Processing Unit (SPU);
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
                                                              Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to
                        Respondent.                           Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)


Lisa Annette Roquemore, Law Office of Lisa A. Roquemore, Rancho Santa Margarita,
CA, for petitioner.

Traci R. Patton, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.


                                DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

       On November 29, 2018, Jadyn Roylance filed a petition for compensation under
the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered the Table Injury of SIRVA, standing
for shoulder injury related to vaccine administration or a SIRVA which was caused in
fact by the second Gardasil3 vaccine she received on January 12, 2017. Petition at 2,
5. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special
Masters.



1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).

3Gardasil is the name of the Human Papillomavirus 9-valent (“HPV”) vaccine manufactured by Merck.
See https://www.gardasil9.com (last visited Aug. 22, 2019).
        On August 22, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner
entitled to compensation for her SIRVA. On February 25, 2020, Respondent filed a
proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded
$103,891.57, representing compensation in the amount of $100,000.00 for her pain and
suffering and in the amount of $3,891.57 for her past out-of-pocket medical expenses.
Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the
proffered award.

the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to
an award as stated in the Proffer.

      Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump
sum payment of $103,891.57, representing compensation in the amount of
$100,000.00 for her pain and suffering and in the amount of $3,891.57 for her
actual unreimbursable expenses in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This
amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

       The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.


                                          s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                          Brian H. Corcoran
                                          Chief Special Master




4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.


                                                      2
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
                           OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS


    JADYN ROYLANCE,               )
                                  )
              Petitioner,         )
    v.                            )                  No. 18-1831V
                                  )                  Chief Special Master Corcoran
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN )                  ECF
    SERVICES,                     )
                                  )
              Respondent.         )
                                  )

               RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

    I.    Items of Compensation

          On August 16, 2019, respondent conceded that entitlement to compensation was

appropriate under the terms of the Vaccine Act. Chief Special Master Dorsey issued a Ruling on

Entitlement on August 22, 2019, finding that petitioner was entitled to vaccine compensation for

her left-sided shoulder injury. Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that

petitioner should be awarded $103,891.57. The award is comprised of the following:

$100,000.00 for pain and suffering and $3,891.57 for past out of pocket medical expenses. This

amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

    II.   Form of the Award

          The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through

a lump sum payment of $103,891.57, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 1 Petitioner

agrees.


1
 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court
for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings
and future pain and suffering.
      Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case.

                                                   Respectfully submitted,

                                                   JOSEPH H. HUNT
                                                   Assistant Attorney General

                                                   C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO
                                                   Acting Director
                                                   Torts Branch, Civil Division

                                                   CATHARINE E. REEVES
                                                   Deputy Director
                                                   Torts Branch, Civil Division

                                                   ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
                                                   Assistant Director
                                                   Torts Branch, Civil Division

                                                   s/ Traci R. Patton
                                                   TRACI R. PATTON
                                                   Senior Trial Attorney
                                                   Torts Branch, Civil Division
                                                   U.S. Department of Justice
                                                   P.O. Box 146
                                                   Benjamin Franklin Station
                                                   Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
                                                   Telephone: (202) 353-1589

Dated: February 25, 2020




                                               2