Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jose Guerrero-Yanez v. Lorie Davis, Director, 19-50507 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 19-50507 Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 09, 2020
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-50507 Document: 00515377936 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/09/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-50507 April 9, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk JOSE ANTONIO GUERRERO-YANEZ, Petitioner-Appellant v. LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:18-CV-273 Befo
More
     Case: 19-50507      Document: 00515377936         Page: 1    Date Filed: 04/09/2020




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT   United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                               FILED
                                      No. 19-50507                           April 9, 2020
                                                                            Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                 Clerk
JOSE ANTONIO GUERRERO-YANEZ,

                                                 Petitioner-Appellant

v.

LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

                                                 Respondent-Appellee


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 6:18-CV-273


Before HAYNES, GRAVES, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       A jury convicted Jose Antonio Guerrero-Yanez, Texas prisoner
# 1926789, of multiple sexual crimes and sentenced him to life in prison. He
requests a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court's
dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred.
       This court must consider its jurisdiction sua sponte when necessary.
Mosley v. Cozby, 
813 F.2d 659
, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). The filing of a timely “notice


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-50507     Document: 00515377936     Page: 2   Date Filed: 04/09/2020


                                  No. 19-50507

of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement,” and an appeal that has
not been made within statutory time limits must be dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction. Bowles v. Russell, 
551 U.S. 205
, 213-14 (2007). Proceedings under
§ 2254 are civil. See Hernandez v. Thaler, 
630 F.3d 420
, 424 (5th Cir. 2011).
Where, as here, the United States is not party, the notice of appeal in a civil
case must be filed within 30 days after the entry of the judgment or order being
appealed. FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A).
      Guerrero-Yanez filed his notice of appeal more than 100 days after the
dismissal of the § 2254 petition and at least 60 days after the denial of his
motion for reconsideration, which is construed as a motion under Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 60(b). Because the notice of appeal is untimely as to any
district court order, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and the
COA motion is DENIED as moot. See 
Bowles, 551 U.S. at 213
.




                                        2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer