Filed: Apr. 29, 2020
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-50053 Document: 00515398719 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-50053 April 29, 2020 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MAXIMILIANO MENDOZA-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:18-CR-200-1 Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
Summary: Case: 19-50053 Document: 00515398719 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-50053 April 29, 2020 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MAXIMILIANO MENDOZA-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:18-CR-200-1 Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. P..
More
Case: 19-50053 Document: 00515398719 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2020
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 19-50053 April 29, 2020
Conference Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
MAXIMILIANO MENDOZA-GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 7:18-CR-200-1
Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Maximiliano Mendoza-Garcia has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Mendoza-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 19-50053 Document: 00515398719 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/29/2020
No. 19-50053
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2