Filed: Apr. 01, 2020
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2020
Summary: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT BOBBY J. NAPIER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellees. No. 4D20-65 [April 1, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-CA- 010964-XXXX-MB. Bobby J. Napier, Pahokee, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Duncan v. Moore, 754 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2000) (recognizing
Summary: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT BOBBY J. NAPIER, Appellant, v. FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellees. No. 4D20-65 [April 1, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-CA- 010964-XXXX-MB. Bobby J. Napier, Pahokee, pro se. No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Duncan v. Moore, 754 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2000) (recognizing ..
More
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
BOBBY J. NAPIER,
Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION and
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Appellees.
No. 4D20-65
[April 1, 2020]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-CA-
010964-XXXX-MB.
Bobby J. Napier, Pahokee, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Duncan v. Moore, 754 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2000) (recognizing
that the conditional release statute does not violate the double jeopardy,
due process, or ex post facto clauses); Fleming v. State,
697 So. 2d 1322
(Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (acknowledging that there is no entitlement to credit
for time spent on conditional release).
LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
