Filed: May 27, 2020
Latest Update: May 28, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and FOIL Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. David RIVERA Gas Turbine System Mechanical Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202000018 Decided: 27 May 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Chad C. Temple Sentence adjudged 28 October 2019 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and FOIL Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. David RIVERA Gas Turbine System Mechanical Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202000018 Decided: 27 May 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Chad C. Temple Sentence adjudged 28 October 2019 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
TANG, LAWRENCE, and FOIL
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
David RIVERA
Gas Turbine System Mechanical
Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 202000018
Decided: 27 May 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Chad C. Temple
Sentence adjudged 28 October 2019 by a special court-martial con-
vened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military
judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to
E-1, confinement for 12 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Commander Michael E. Maffei, JAGC, USN
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. Rivera, NMCCA No. 202000018
Opinion of the Court
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. Articles 59, 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C.
§§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2