Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. James Stanley, 19-14320 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 19-14320 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-14320 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-14320 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00006-EAK-CPT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES STANLEY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 12, 2020) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Burns, appointed couns
More
              Case: 19-14320    Date Filed: 06/12/2020   Page: 1 of 2



                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]



               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 19-14320
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00006-EAK-CPT-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus


JAMES STANLEY,
                                                             Defendant-Appellant.
                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                         ________________________

                                 (June 12, 2020)

Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for James Stanley in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
              Case: 19-14320     Date Filed: 06/12/2020   Page: 2 of 2



appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Stanley’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer