Filed: Jul. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-14701 Date Filed: 07/07/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-14701 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00012-TKW-MJF-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON SCOTT PLUMADORE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 7, 2020) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-14701 Date File
Summary: Case: 19-14701 Date Filed: 07/07/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-14701 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00012-TKW-MJF-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON SCOTT PLUMADORE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 7, 2020) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-14701 Date Filed..
More
Case: 19-14701 Date Filed: 07/07/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-14701
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00012-TKW-MJF-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JASON SCOTT PLUMADORE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(July 7, 2020)
Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 19-14701 Date Filed: 07/07/2020 Page: 2 of 2
John Wilkins, appointed counsel for Jason Plumadore in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, Plumadore’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is
DENIED, and Plumadore’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2