Filed: Jul. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-15111 Date Filed: 07/16/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-15111 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:18-cr-00013-LGW-BWC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ENIO CAMACHO-PINEDA, a.k.a. Tony, a.k.a. Tony Montana, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (July 16, 2020) Before JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER
Summary: Case: 19-15111 Date Filed: 07/16/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-15111 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:18-cr-00013-LGW-BWC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ENIO CAMACHO-PINEDA, a.k.a. Tony, a.k.a. Tony Montana, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (July 16, 2020) Before JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER C..
More
Case: 19-15111 Date Filed: 07/16/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-15111
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:18-cr-00013-LGW-BWC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ENIO CAMACHO-PINEDA,
a.k.a. Tony,
a.k.a. Tony Montana,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(July 16, 2020)
Before JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 19-15111 Date Filed: 07/16/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Adam Ferrell, appointed counsel for Enio Camacho-Pineda in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Camacho-Pineda’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2