Filed: Aug. 25, 2020
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2020
Summary: Case: 20-10458 Date Filed: 08/25/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 20-10458 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00461-VMC-CPT-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILMER JACINTO TOMALA-DE LA CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 25, 2020) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 20-104
Summary: Case: 20-10458 Date Filed: 08/25/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 20-10458 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00461-VMC-CPT-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILMER JACINTO TOMALA-DE LA CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 25, 2020) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 20-1045..
More
Case: 20-10458 Date Filed: 08/25/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-10458
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-00461-VMC-CPT-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILMER JACINTO TOMALA-DE LA CRUZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 25, 2020)
Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 20-10458 Date Filed: 08/25/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Victor Martinez, appointed counsel for Wilmer Tomala-De La Cruz in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Tomala-De La Cruz’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2