Filed: Aug. 26, 2020
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2020
Summary: Case: 20-10940 Date Filed: 08/26/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 20-10940 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00089-WS-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TYKIEF LASHAWN DUNN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (August 26, 2020) Before GRANT, LUCK, and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 20-10940 Date Filed: 08/26/20
Summary: Case: 20-10940 Date Filed: 08/26/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 20-10940 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00089-WS-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TYKIEF LASHAWN DUNN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (August 26, 2020) Before GRANT, LUCK, and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 20-10940 Date Filed: 08/26/202..
More
Case: 20-10940 Date Filed: 08/26/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-10940
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00089-WS-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TYKIEF LASHAWN DUNN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(August 26, 2020)
Before GRANT, LUCK, and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 20-10940 Date Filed: 08/26/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Patricia Kemp, appointed counsel for Tykief Dunn in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Dunn’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. The
government’s motion to dismiss the appeal based on the appeal waiver in Dunn’s
plea agreement is DENIED as moot.
2