Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Sean Bradsher, 19-7809 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 19-7809 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7809 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SEAN BRADSHER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:17-cr-00025-1) Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: June 4, 2020 Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sean B
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7809 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SEAN BRADSHER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:17-cr-00025-1) Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: June 4, 2020 Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sean Bradsher, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Sean Bradsher appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bradsher, No. 3:17-cr-00025-1 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer