Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Christine Bryant v. Compass Group U.S.A., Inc., 20-1443 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Number: 20-1443 Visitors: 21
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 30, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 30, 2020 Before DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge No. 20-1443 CHRISTINE BRYANT, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, v. Eastern Division. COMPASS GROUP USA, INC., No. 19 C 6622 Defendant-Appellant. Virginia M. Kendall, Judge. ORDER Defendant-Appellant Compass Group, Inc., filed a petiti
More
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 30, 2020 Before DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge No. 20‐1443 CHRISTINE BRYANT, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff‐Appellee, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, v. Eastern Division. COMPASS GROUP USA, INC., No. 19 C 6622 Defendant‐Appellant. Virginia M. Kendall, Judge. ORDER Defendant‐Appellant Compass Group, Inc., filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc on May 19, 2020. No judge in regular active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, and all of the judges on the panel have voted to deny rehearing, but to amend the opinion as follows, on page 16 of the slip opinion, to add two new sentences after the first sentence under heading II.D.: “Bryant’s claim under section 15(a) is a separate matter. Importantly, Bryant alleged only a claim under the provision of that section requiring development of a “written policy, made available to the public, establishing a retention schedule and guidelines for permanently destroying biometric identifiers and biometric information,” not under the provision requiring compliance with the established retention schedule and destruction guidelines. Our analysis is thus limited to the theory she invoked. Section 15(a) obligates private entities … .” No. 20‐1443 Page 2 With this amendment, the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is DENIED.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer