Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Catherine Dahlberg v. Radisson Blu Mall of America, 19-3062 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 19-3062 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 15, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-3062 _ Catherine Dahlberg lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Radisson Blu Mall of America lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota _ Submitted: June 10, 2020 Filed: June 15, 2020 [Unpublished] _ Before GRASZ, BEAM, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Catherine Dahlberg appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this emplo
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 19-3062
                        ___________________________

                                 Catherine Dahlberg

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

                          Radisson Blu Mall of America

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                         for the District of Minnesota
                                 ____________

                             Submitted: June 10, 2020
                               Filed: June 15, 2020
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before GRASZ, BEAM, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

     Catherine Dahlberg appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in this employment discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the

      1
      The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of
Minnesota.
record and the arguments on appeal, we conclude the district court did not err in
granting summary judgment. See Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 
643 F.3d 1031
,
1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (reviewing de novo grant of summary judgment).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer