Filed: Jun. 29, 2020
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-3233 _ Hollis J. Larson; Guy Greene lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Carlton County Jail; Kelly Lake, Carlton County Sheriff; Paul Coughlin, Carlton County Jail Administrator; Brian Belich, Carlton County Deputy Sheriff; Jason Wilmes, Carlton County Jail Sergeant; Cammi Werner, Carlton County Jail Employee; Travis Warnygora, Carlton County Jail Employee; Dave Kumanen, Carlton County Jail Sergeant; John Does; Jane Does,
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-3233 _ Hollis J. Larson; Guy Greene lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants v. Carlton County Jail; Kelly Lake, Carlton County Sheriff; Paul Coughlin, Carlton County Jail Administrator; Brian Belich, Carlton County Deputy Sheriff; Jason Wilmes, Carlton County Jail Sergeant; Cammi Werner, Carlton County Jail Employee; Travis Warnygora, Carlton County Jail Employee; Dave Kumanen, Carlton County Jail Sergeant; John Does; Jane Does, ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-3233
___________________________
Hollis J. Larson; Guy Greene
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiffs - Appellants
v.
Carlton County Jail; Kelly Lake, Carlton County Sheriff; Paul Coughlin, Carlton
County Jail Administrator; Brian Belich, Carlton County Deputy Sheriff; Jason
Wilmes, Carlton County Jail Sergeant; Cammi Werner, Carlton County Jail
Employee; Travis Warnygora, Carlton County Jail Employee; Dave Kumanen,
Carlton County Jail Sergeant; John Does; Jane Does, an unknown number; all in
their individual and official capacities
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: June 25, 2020
Filed: June 29, 2020
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Hollis Larson and Guy Greene appeal from the adverse grant of summary
judgment in their 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record de
novo and the arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court1 properly
granted summary judgment because there were no genuine disputes as to material
facts and appellants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Brooks v. Roy,
776 F.3d 957, 960 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review); see also Scott v. Harris,
550
U.S. 372, 380 (2007). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Elizabeth
Cowan Wright, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-