Judges: Stanceu
Filed: Jul. 31, 2020
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2020
Summary: Slip Op. 20-107 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE YAMA RIBBONS AND BOWS CO., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge Defendant, Court No. 18-00054 and BERWICK OFFRAY, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. JUDGMENT Before the court are the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Feb. 21, 2020), ECF No. 37-1 (the “Remand Redetermination”), submitted by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, in response to the order of this
Summary: Slip Op. 20-107 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE YAMA RIBBONS AND BOWS CO., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge Defendant, Court No. 18-00054 and BERWICK OFFRAY, LLC, Defendant-Intervenor. JUDGMENT Before the court are the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Feb. 21, 2020), ECF No. 37-1 (the “Remand Redetermination”), submitted by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, in response to the order of this ..
More
Slip Op. 20-107
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
YAMA RIBBONS AND BOWS CO.,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge
Defendant, Court No. 18-00054
and
BERWICK OFFRAY, LLC,
Defendant-Intervenor.
JUDGMENT
Before the court are the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand
(Feb. 21, 2020), ECF No. 37-1 (the “Remand Redetermination”), submitted by the International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, in response to the order of this court in
Yama Ribbons and Bows Co. v. United States, 43 CIT __,
419 F. Supp. 3d 1341 (2019)
(“Yama”). Also before the court are letters by plaintiff (Apr. 1, 2020), ECF No. 42, and
defendant-intervenor (Apr. 1, 2020), ECF No. 41, which state that the parties have no comments
on, and raise no objections to, the Remand Redetermination. Upon review, the court concludes
that the Remand Redetermination complies with the court’s order in Yama and that, no party
having objected, the Remand Redetermination should be sustained.
Therefore, upon consideration of the Remand Redetermination and all papers and
proceedings had herein, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby
Court No. 18-00054 Page 2
ORDERED that the Remand Redetermination be, and hereby is, sustained; and it is
further
ORDERED that the entries at issue in this litigation shall be liquidated in accordance
with the final court decision in this action.
V7LPRWK\&6WDQFHX
_____________________________
Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge
Dated: July 31, 2020
New York, New York