Filed: Jun. 08, 2020
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and COGLEY Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Arthur B. SANDERS III Machinist’s Mate First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202000060 Decided: 8 June 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Kimberly J. Kelly Sentence adjudged 9 December 2019 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consi
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and COGLEY Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Arthur B. SANDERS III Machinist’s Mate First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 202000060 Decided: 8 June 2020 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Kimberly J. Kelly Sentence adjudged 9 December 2019 by a special court-martial con- vened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consis..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
TANG, LAWRENCE, and COGLEY
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Arthur B. SANDERS III
Machinist’s Mate First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 202000060
Decided: 8 June 2020
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge:
Kimberly J. Kelly
Sentence adjudged 9 December 2019 by a special court-martial con-
vened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a
military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment:
reduction to E-5, confinement for 60 days, and a bad-conduct dis-
charge.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Commander Jacqueline M. Leonard, JAGC, USN
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. Sanders, NMCCA No. 202000060
Opinion of the Court
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial
rights occurred. Articles 59, 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C.
§§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2