In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                  OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 18-0624V
                                         UNPUBLISHED


    JOSEPH DAVIS,                                             Chief Special Master Corcoran

                         Petitioner,                          Filed: July 16, 2020
    v.
                                                              Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint
    SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND                                   Stipulation on Damages; Influenza
    HUMAN SERVICES,                                           (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury
                                                              Related to Vaccine Administration
                        Respondent.                           (SIRVA)


Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.


                               DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

        On May 2, 2018, Joseph Davis filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a right shoulder injury related to
vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received on
September 26, 2016. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed at July 15, 2020, ¶¶ 2-4. Petitioner
further alleges that the vaccine was administered in the United States, that he
experienced the residual effects of his injury for more than six months, and that there
has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of his
condition. Petition at 1, 3; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner
sustained a SIRVA Table injury and denies that petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury and
its residual effects were caused-in-fact by his flu vaccine. Respondent further denies
that the flu vaccine caused petitioner any other injury or his current condition.”
Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am
required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-
Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access
to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of
privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public access.
2
 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa (2012).
       Nevertheless, on July 15, 2020, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,
stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation
reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth
therein.

     Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following
compensation:

        A lump sum of $42,500.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner.
        Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
        damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of
a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed
to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.


                                          s/Brian H. Corcoran
                                          Brian H. Corcoran
                                          Chief Special Master




3
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.

                                                      2
            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
                      OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

 JOSEPH DA VIS,

                        Petitioner,
                                                         No. 18-624V
       v.                                                Chief Special Master Corcoran (SPU)
                                                         ECF
 SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
 HUMAN SERVICES,

                        Respondent.


                                            STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

        1. Petitioner Joseph Davis ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

       2. Petitioner received his flu immunization on September 26, 2016.

       3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

       4. Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration

("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table, that his alleged shoulder condition is

actually caused by the vaccine, and further alleges that he experienced the residual effects of his

injury for more than six months.

       5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of his condition.