Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: HEALTH CARE CENTER OF PENSACOLA, INC., D/B/A HEALTH CENTER OF PENSACOLA
Judges: STEPHEN F. DEAN
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Pensacola, Florida
Filed: Aug. 13, 2001
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, March 3, 2004.
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2024
B ‘Certified Article Number :
f 706 4575 1294 2049 £503
SENDERS R
STATE OF FLORIDA ERS RECORD
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR OT- Sl of
HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner,
vs.
THE HEALTH CENTER OF
PENSACOLA, INC., d/b/a HEALTH
CENTER OF PENSACOLA,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that after twenty-one (21) days from
receipt of this Complaint, the State of Florida, Agency for Health Care
Administration (“Agency”) intends to impose an administrative fine in the
amount of $2,000.00 upon The Health Center of Pensacola, Inc.
((‘Respondent” or “Health Center of Pensacola”). As grounds for the
imposition of this administrative fine, the Agency alleges as follows:
1. | ‘The Agency has jurisdiction over the Respondent pursuant to
Chapter 400 Part II, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent, Health Center of Pensacola, is licensed by the
Agency to operate a nursing home at 8475 University Parkway, Pensacola,
Florida 32514 and is obligated to operate the nursing home in compliance
with Chapter 400 Part II, Florida Statutes, and Rule 59A-4, Florida
es Soran aera sarees Bl
oN
f
3. On February 15-17, 2000 a survey team from the Agency’s
Area 1 Office conducted a survey and the following Class III deficiency was
cited.
3A. Pursuant to 42 CFR 483.25(i)(1), based on a _ resident’s
comprehensive assessment, the facility must ensure that a resident
maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight
and protein levels, unless the resident’s clinical condition demonstrates
that this is not possible. This requirement was not met as evidenced by the
following observations:
(1) Review of the clinical record of resident #1 revealed a
nutritional assessment completed on November 12,
1999, which assessed the resident to need an estimated
1,445 to 1,767 calories per day. Further review of
physician and nurses progress notes revealed that on
June 14, 1999, the resident's tube feeding was decreased
to Osmolite HN Plus at 35cc per hour due to an episode
of vomiting the day before and "excess mucous noted
drooling down chin." This administration rate provided
the resident with 1,008 calories per day, which was half
of the amount of formula being previously administered.
The resident remained on the 1,008 calories per day
until he was weighed in July and was noted to have lost
6.5 pounds.
(2) On July 13, 1999, the resident's physician increased the
. tube feeding back to the previous 70cc per hour due to
the weight loss. Nursing notes from June 14, 1999 to
July 13, 1999 indicated that the resident was tolerating
the tube feeding without any further difficulty. At the
time of the survey, the resident had a recorded weight of
141.2 pounds on February 7, 2000. This was a -9-pound
weight gain since the tube feeding was increased on July
13, 1999.
(3) Resident #6 was assessed as a weight concern with a
need to maintain body weight. There were several
approaches in her care plan designed to maintain her
rere
é
4
weight but none included a supplement with the
medication pass. In October of 1999, the resident
' weighed 110.8 pounds. Her December 1999 weight was
103 pounds. By February 7, 2000, the resident's weight
had dropped to 97.4 pounds, a 13 pound weight loss in
five months. On December 21, 1999, the Registered
Dietitian recommended 2 cal HN 60cc with med pass.
Interview with staff on February 15, 2000 at 1:15 p.m.
revealed that nursing had not followed through with the
recommendations to prevent further weight loss and the
resident was continuing to lose weight.
(4) Based on interviews with facility staff, observation, and
review of 2 of 26 sampled residents, it was determined
that the facility violated 42 CFR 483.25(i)(1), Federal
Regulations, §400.141(7), Florida Statutes, and Rule
59A-4.1288, F.A.C., for failing to maintain acceptable
parameters of nutritional status.
4, On March 25-29, 2001 a survey team from the Agency’s Area 1
Office conducted a survey and the following repeat Class Ill (by date of
survey, this tag had been reclassified as Class II) deficiency was cited.
4A. Pursuant to 42 CFR 483.25(i)(1), based on a resident’s
comprehensive assessment, the facility must ensure that a resident
maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight
and protein levels, unless the resident’s clinical condition demonstrates
that this is not possible. This requirement was not met as evidenced by the
following observations:
(1) Resident # 11 was admitted to the facility on November
17, 2000 with diagnoses to include in part Burns to 10-19% of
body, Parkinson’ Disease, Paralysis agitans, Undersocialized
Conduct Disorder with aggressiveness and agitation, Anemia,
Upper GI Bleed.
a. The resident was also noted to have a Stage II
decubitus on the left buttocks on admission.
His/her admission weight was recorded at 121.4
lbs. and height was recorded at 64 inches and a
usual body weight of 130 pounds. .
The resident’s nutritional needs were calculated on
an inaccurate height and body weight recorded at
the time of admission.
The resident was placed on a Pureed diet with
Ensure supplements three times a day (with
meals) and snacks between meals.
Further review of the chart indicated the resident
gained up to 125.6 pounds by January 1, 2001.
However, on January 24, 2001, the Ensure
supplements were discontinued following
recommendations by the facility dietitian.
Documentation on December 6, 2000 indicated the -
wound to the resident's coccyx had healed.
Nutrition progress notes on February 11, 2001
stated: “notified by DON (Director of Nursing) of
open area to left buttocks" and on March 17, 2001
was noted to have three open areas to the left
buttocks and coccyx. _
By March 5, 2001, the resident's weight had
dropped to 120 pounds.
On March 4, 2001, physician orders were noted to
re-start Ensure supplements four times a day
along with additional protein supplements.
On March 6, 2001, an appetite stimulant was
added. ,
On March 15, 2001, the order was changed to 2
cans of ensure with each meal.
During the first 2-3 weeks in March, his/her oral
intake was recorded at 50% or less (including the 2
cans of Ensure) for 13 of 18 days.
On March 5, 2001, the resident was placed on IV
hydration.
A family member, who had been designated as the
resident's Health Care Proxy, was contacted per
physician orders on March 6, 2001 regarding PEG
tube placement and an interdisciplinary note on
March -9, 2001 by the social worker that stated:
"Resident very confused, refusing meals. Has been
doing better last couple of days. Family approved
_ tube feeding if needed."
The resident was admitted to an acute care setting
on March 18, 2001 with diagnoses to include GI
bleeding, Anemia, and Urinary Tract Infection.
4
ond
p. Upon return to the facility on March 23, 2001, the
resident was documented to have multiple open
areas, including an unstagable open area with
yellow granulation on the left lower buttocks, and
continued decreased appetite.
q. Intake documentation since return to facility had
been poor to fair with an increase in appetite up to
85-100% noted only during the last 2 days of the
survey (March 28 & 29, 2001).
r. On 3/25/01 the resident was sent back out to the
hospital because of dehydration, cloudy urine,
poor po (oral) intake, elevated temperature, and
being unable to sit up. He/she returned to the
facility the following day, on March 26, 2001, with
a diagnosis of Pneumonia. Review of lab results
revealed a serum albumin documented on
November 16, 2000 (on admission) was 3.2 g/dl.
Subsequent Albumin levels showed a continuous
decline, indicating the resident's inability to
maintain adequate protein stores and nutritional
status, with the following results:
(1) December 28, 2000 - 2.9 g/ dl;
(2) January 25, 2001 - 2.7 g/dl;
(3) February 12, 2001 - 2.5 g/dl;
(4) March 4, 2001 - 2.4 g/dl; and
(5) March 25, 2001 — 1.7 g/dl.
s. The most current Albumin level on March 27, 2001
is documented at 1.8 g/dl.
t. At the time of the survey and initial review of the
resident's record on March 27, 2001, interventions
for aggressive nutritional support had not been
considered or offered to the. resident even though
permission for such was given by his/her family on
March 9, 2001.
(2) Based on interviews with facility staff, observation, and
clinical record review of 1 of 27 sampled residents (# 11), it was
determined that the facility violated 42 CFR 483.25(i)(1),
Federal Regulations, §400.141(7), Florida Statutes, and Rule
50A-4.1288, F.A.C., for again failing to maintain acceptable
parameters of nutritional status..
c i
5. Based -on the foregoing, Health Center of Pensacola ‘has
violated the following:
a) Tag F325 incorporates 42 CFR 483.25(i)(1) and Rule
59A-4.1288, F.A.C. The administrative fine imposed for this
repeat violation is $2,000.00.
6. The above referenced violations constitute grounds to levy this
civil penalty pursuant to Section 400.23(9)(c), Florida Statutes, in that the
above referenced conduct of Respondent constitutes a violation of the
minimum standards, rules, and regulations for the operation of a Nursing
Home. .
NOTICE
Respondent is notified that it has a right to request an administrative
hearing pursuant to Section 120.57, Florida Statutes, to be represented by
counsel (at its expense), to take testimony, to call or cross-examine
witnesses, to have subpoenas and/or subpoenas duces tecum issued, and
to present written evidence or argument if it requests a hearing.
In order to obtain a formal proceeding under Section 120.57(1),
Florida Statutes, Respondent’s request must state which issues of material
fact are disputed. Failure’ to dispute material issues of fact in the request
for a hearing, may be treated by the Agency as an election by Respondent
for an informal proceeding under Section 120.57(2), Florida Statutes. All
requests for hearing should be made to the Agency for Health Care
Administration, Attention: Sam Power, Agency Clerk, Senior Attorney,
2727 Mahan Drive, Mail Stop #3, Tallahassee, Florida 32308.
All payment of fines should be made by check, cashier’s check, or
money order and payable to the Agency for Health Care Administration. All
‘checks, cashier’s checks, and money orders should identify the AHCA
number and facility name that is referenced on page 1 of this complaint.
All payment of fines should be sent to the Agency for Health Care
Administration, Finance & Accounting, Attention: Gloria Collins, 2727
Mahan Drive, Bldg. #2, Mail Stop #14, Tallahassee, Florida 32308. .
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO
REQUEST A HEARING WITHIN 21 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS
COMPLAINT WILL RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF THE FACTS
ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT AND THE ENTRY OF A FINAL ORDER
BY THE AGENCY.
p>
Issued this | day of C iQ. , 2001.
/,
Sah Heiberg
Field Office Manager, Areas 1 & 2
Agency for Health Care Administration
Health Quality Assurance
2727 Mahan Drive, Bldg. 2, MS#46
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
i
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the original complaint was sent by U:S.
Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to: Administrator, Health Center of
Pensacola, 8475 University Parkway, Pensacola, Florida 32514 on this
sSheday of sil 2001.
Christine T. Messana, Esquire
Office of the General Counsel
Copies furnished to:
Christine T. Messana
Senior Attorney
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive, Bldg. 3, MS#3
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
a
Elizabeth Dudek, Deputy Secretary
Managed Care and Health Quality
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive, Bldg. 1, MS#12
Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5403
Donah Heiberg
Area 1 & 2 Field Office
Managed Care & Health Quality :
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive, Building 2, MS# 46
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Long Term Care Unit
MS#33
Gloria Collins
Finance & Accounting
MS# 14
Docket for Case No: 01-003139
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Mar. 03, 2004 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Mar. 02, 2004 |
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (filed via facsimile).
|
Mar. 02, 2004 |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Mar. 01, 2004 |
Petitioner`s Status Report (filed via facsimile).
|
Jan. 21, 2004 |
Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by March 1, 2004).
|
Jan. 20, 2004 |
Agreed Motion for Continuance (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Jan. 09, 2004 |
Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for January 21 and 22, 2004; 10:00 a.m.; Pensacola, FL; amended as to Room location).
|
Dec. 10, 2003 |
Notice of Cancellation of Deposition Duces Tecum of Agency Representative (filed via facsimile).
|
Nov. 14, 2003 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for January 21 and 22, 2004; 10:00 a.m.; Pensacola, FL).
|
Nov. 14, 2003 |
Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum of Agency Representative (filed via facsimile).
|
Oct. 28, 2003 |
Motion for Continuance (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Oct. 24, 2003 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Oct. 24, 2003 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for November 18 and 19, 2003; 10:00 a.m.; Pensacola, FL).
|
Jul. 18, 2003 |
Letter to Judge Dean from D. Aldrick available hearing dates (filed via facsimile).
|
May 30, 2003 |
Notice of Substitution of Counsel and Request for Service (filed by T. Moore via facsimile).
|
May 20, 2003 |
Order issued. CASE REOPENED.
|
Feb. 24, 2003 |
Renewal of Motion to Reopen Record (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Oct. 03, 2002 |
Notice of Substitution of Counsel (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Oct. 02, 2002 |
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (filed by M. Howard via facsimile).
|
Jun. 17, 2002 |
Motion to Re-Open Case (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jun. 17, 2002 |
Joint Motion to Re-Open Case (filed via facsimile).
|
Oct. 29, 2001 |
Notice of Cancellation filed by Petitioner
|
Oct. 29, 2001 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Oct. 25, 2001 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Oct. 22, 2001 |
Order issued (the Motion for Fees and Costs is denied, the Motion for Continuance is denied).
|
Oct. 19, 2001 |
Order of Consolidation issued. (consolidated cases are: 01-001984, 01-003139)
|
Aug. 22, 2001 |
Response to Initial Order With Request to Schedule Final Hearing Beyond Seventy Days (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Aug. 14, 2001 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Aug. 13, 2001 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Aug. 13, 2001 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Aug. 13, 2001 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|