Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BUREAU OF PHARMACY SERVICES
Respondent: HABANA HOSPITAL PHARMACY, INC., ET AL.
Judges: WILLIAM R. PFEIFFER
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Feb. 15, 2002
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, May 29, 2002.
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2025
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
through its BUREAU OF
PHARMACY SERVICES,
Petitioner,
Case No:
vs. : (DOH: 01-04818, 01-04819
and 99-04145)
HABANA HOSPITAL PHARMACY, INC., a Florida
Corporation, and WALTER E. DYKES, R.Ph.,
individually,
Respondenis.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Notice is hereby provided that Petitioner, Department of Health by and through its
Bureau of Pharmacy Services (the "bureau, intends to revoke the prescription drug wholesaler
permit of Habana Hospital Pharmacy; Inc., d/b/a Habana Wholesale Drug Company, revoke and
deny renewal of the retail pharmacy wholesaler permit of Habana Hospital Pharmacy, Inc., d/b/a
Habana Hospital Pharmacy pursuant to section 499.067, Florida Statutes; and impose an
administrative fine in the amount of $96,500 against Habana Hospital Pharmacy, Inc., and
Walter E. Dykes pursuant to section 499.066, Florida Statutes. In suppgtt of the intended final -
agency action the bureau states:
(1) Petitioner, Department of Health, through its Bureau of Pharmacy Services,
2818-A Mahan Drive, Tallahassee, Florida, 32308, is the Florida state agency responsible for ~
implementing and enforcing the provisions of the Florida Drug and Cosmetic Act, Chapter 499,
Sopp arsersp eee
reece permet on nae
Dstt OE AE ee ee eee ee
a
Florida Statutes, including the regulation of the acquisition and distribution of prescription drugs
in Florida. _
(2) Respondent, Habana Hospital Pharmacy, Inc., (“Corporate”) is a Florida
registered corporation whose principal place of business is 4710 N. Habana Avenue, Suite 101,
Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida 33614. Corporate is licensed under the Florida Drug and
Cosmetic Act, Chapter 499, F.S., (“the Act’) asa prescription drug wholesaler to do business
under the name Habana Wholesale Drug Co. (“Habana Wholesale”) with permit number
29-0106. This two-year permit was originally issued on February 5, 1999, has been renewed
once and is scheduled to expire by operation of law on February 28, 2003.
(3) Respondent is also licensed under the Act as a retail pharmacy wholesaler to do
business under the name Habana Hospital Pharmacy, Inc., (“Habana Pharmacy”) with permit
number 24:00242. This two-year permit was originally issued on October 22, 1993, has been
renewed several times, and was scheduled to expire by operation of law on October 31, 2001.
Habana Pharmacy. submitted an application to renew the retail pharmacy wholesaler permit
24:00242 that was received by the bureau on September 21. 2001. A check in the amount of
$100 for the renewal application fee was also submitted with the reriewal application.
(4) Further, Respondent, Corporate, is licensed under the Florida Pharmacy Act,
Chapter 465, F.S., to operate as a community pharmacy and special parenteral / enteral
pharmacy with license number PH1815. This permit expires on February 28, 2003. Habana
Pharmacy’s U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) registration nuiber is AH0208226.
(5) Walter E. Dykes, R.Ph., is the president of Corporate’ and is responsible for the
operations of Habana Wholesale and Habana Pharmacy.
(6) On June 10, 2001, the bureau’s agent presented himself at 4710 N. Habana
Avenue in Tampa for an inspection of the wholesale operations of Habana Wholesale’ under the
Spm erp oe ee
SE Der ee oe
SOUR ore og Ser
Ape em re
Ter
a
prescription drug wholesaler permit and Habana Pharmacy under the retail pharmacy
wholesaler permit.
(7) In response to the bureau’s request for records related to the prescription drug
wholesaling activities of Habana Wholesale, Corporate produced purchase records from
Response Oncology / Impact Center of Tampa selling prescription drugs to Habana Pharmacy.
These purchase records indicate Response Oncology / Impact Center sold the prescription
drugs to Habana Pharmacy and reference Habana Pharmacy’s DEA number. Corporate
represented that these were all the records of purchase for prescription drugs sold by Habana
Wholesale.
(8) Habana Wholesale purchased or received prescription drugs from a person not
authorized to wholesale prescription drugs to it, in violation of.s. 499.005(14), FS. See for
example Exhibits 15a — 18a; 21 - 34; and 44 - 47, which are attached to and by reference made
a part of this complaint. Habana Wholesale acquired the prescription drugs it wholesaled from
Habana Pharmacy, which is not permitted under the Act to wholesale prescription drugs to a
prescription drug wholesaler.
- (9) : Habana Pharmacy: wholesaled prescription. drugs to- prescription drug 2
wholesalers contrary to the requirement of s. 499.012(2)(d)4., F.S. At the time of these
transactions this statute only authorized a retail pharmacy wholesaler, such as Habana
Pharmacy, to wholesale prescription drugs to another retail pharmacy or to a Health care
practitioner licensed in this state and authorized by law to dispense of prescribe prescription
drugs. Habana Pharmacy either wholesaled prescription drugs totaling in excess of $2.7 million
to Habana Wholesale for further wholesale distribution or wholesaled prescription drugs directly
to prescription drug wholesalers. This is reflected in a sampling of records marked Exhibits 1
a aeccaniad
UR Ai a a
a
ee
a
through 21, which are attached to and by reference made a part of this complaint. Habana
Pharmacy thus violated the Act as follows:
(a) Habana Pharmacy violated s. 499.005(15), F.S. by selling and transferring
prescription drugs to a person not authorized to purchase prescription drugs from Habana
Pharmacy. . . . oe ,
(b) Habana Pharmacy violated s. 499.005(22), F.S., since it was operating as a
prescription drug wholesaler without obtaining a permit issued under the Act that authorizes the
sale of prescription drugs to a prescription drug wholesaler. However, Habana Pharmacy is not
eligible to obtain a prescription drug wholesaler permit in its name under the Act pursuant to s.
499.01(1)(c), F.S.
(10) (a) On or about May 26, 1999, Walter E. Dykes represented to the department
that the estimate of monthly prescription drug purchases for Habana Hospital Pharmacy was
$200,000 and that the estimate for the monthly wholesale drug sales was $40,000. See Exhibit
35, which is attached to and by reference made a part of this complaint. However, according to
records obtained by the Bureau as referenced in paragraph (7), Habana Pharmacy purchased
prescription drugs totaling approximately $115,270 for January 1999; $664,826 for February
1999; $872,000 for March, 1999; and $392,156 for April 1999. ‘Corporate represented that
these records represent prescription drugs that were distributed in wholesale transactions and
not dispensed. These transactions do-not take into consideration prescription drugs that might
have been purchased for dispensing by Habana Pharmacy. According’ to Ss. 499.012(2)(d)2,
F.S., a retail pharmacy wholesaler may only wholesale up to 30% of prescription drugs
purchased by the retail pharmacy. Therefore these representations obstructed the bureau's
ability to adequately assess Habana Pharmacy’s compliance with s. 499.012(2)(d)2., F.S., and
its retail pharmacy wholesaler permit. As a result, Walter Dykes has violated s. 499.005(19),
Ten Ter one ee mE
Ae die le
Seger een
ropegrees
2
F.S., by providing the department with false or fraudulent statements regarding the value of
prescription drug purchases and wholesale distributions. *
(b) Ina telephonic conference call on June 27, 2001, with several representatives of the
bureau, Mr. Dykes, and his attorney to discuss the impact of the letter addressed in paragraph
(13), Mr. Dykes stated that Habana Wholesale had not done any business. The bureau
repeated this representation in a follow-up letter to the conference call. See Exhibit 23, whichis _
attached to and by reference made a part of this complaint. Mr. Dykes did not correct this
representation. However, Exhibits 15 — 18, 21 — 34, and 44 - 47, which are attached to and by
reference made a part of this complaint, document that Habana Wholesale did conduct
prescription drug wholesale activity. Again, Mr. Dykes Violated s. 499.005(19), F.S., by
providing false or fraudulent information to the department regarding specific regulated activity.
. . (11) Respondents were not maintaining records in accordance with the requirements
of s. 499.0121(6), F.S., and Rule 64F-12.012, Florida Administrative Code. Specifically,
(a) operational systems between the Habana Pharmacy retail pharmacy wholesaling
activities and the Habana Wholesale activities were not separate and distinct as required by
Rule 64F-12.012(12), Fla. Admin. Code, and as further “specified for retail pharmacy
wholesalers in s. 499.012(2)(d)5, F.S. For example, records documenting the wholesale
distribution of prescription drugs under the two Chapter 499 permits were intermingled and
some records do not identify who wholesaled the prescription drugs. See for example, Exhibits
12-14, 19, and 36, which are attached to and by reference made a part Of this complaint.
(b) Habana Wholesale could not produce records, from any Source, for the purchase of
all prescription drugs which it sold. For example, the 15 vials of Hycamtin 4mg and the 80 vials
of Neupogen sold on February 16, 1999 (See Exhibit 4-a); the six vials of Taxol 300mg sold on
March 3, 1999 (See Exhibit 6-a); the five vials of Hycampton 4mg (according to the NDC code
Pe mp mer ore
SCOR RRR TT ee eee
Some pep
i
the product should be Hycamtin 4 mg) or 30 vials of Neupogen 300 meg sold on March 25,
1999 (See Exhibit 8-a); and the 10 vials of Hycamtin 4mg (10x 4 mg two boxes) sold on
October 19, 1999 (See Exhibit 38) were not supported by purchase records. In addition, there
were no ) records to document the transfer of prescription drugs from Habana Pharmacy to
. Habana Wholesale, notwithstanding ‘such a transfer i is not authorized under the Act.
(c) Invoices did not clearly reflect whether Corporate was wholesaling as Habana
Pharmacy under the retail pharmacy wholesaler permit or as Habana Wholesale under the
prescription drug wholesaler permit since there was no identifying information as to the seller's
name, address, and permit number as required by s. 499.0121(6)(a)1, F.S., and Rule 64F-
12.012(2)(a), Fla. Admin. Code. See Exhibits 12 — 14, 19, and 36, which are attached to and by
reference made a part of this complaint. None of the records documenting wholesale .
distributions included the seller's permit number on the invoices. Furthermore, none of the
records documenting wholesale distributions of prescription drugs included the purchaser’s or
recipient's permit number on the invoices. Rule 64F-12.012(2)(a), Fla. Admin. Code, requires
these elements to appear on one document. See Exhibits 1a — 21a; 22 - 34, 36 - 40 and 44 -
47, which are attached to and by reference made a part of this complaint.
(d) Invoices did not clearly identify the name, strength, and dosage form of prescription
drugs sold in wholesale transactions as required by s. 499.0121(6)(a)3., F.S. For example, on
the invoice dated February 16, 1999 (Exhibit 4-a), the product is identified as Neupogen.
Neupogen comes in several strengths such as 300mcg and 480 mcg. Fithough the NDC code,
that is included on the invoice, if listed correctly, which this one is ot, can help ascertain by
reference to other resources which product was sold, the Act requires the specific identification
of the product to appear on the invoice.
TOP PERE OS Ta
ea a ee
Sm oe rere orem oer
eR oe eR
(e) Section 499.0121(6)(a)4, F.S., requires the dates of receipt and distribution to
appear on records related to the wholesale distribution of prescription drugs. Dates were not
included on at least three invoices related to the wholesale distribution of prescription drugs.
See Exhibits 12, 39, and 40, which are attached to and by reference made a part of this
complaint. . . |
(f) Neither Corporate or Habana Wholesale were an authorized distributor of record, as
defined in s. 499.0121 (6)(d), F.S., for prescription drugs sold to prescription drug wholesalers
(See for example Exhibits 1-11; 14-15, and 47) and did not provide pedigree papers for
these wholesale transactions. A pedigree paper is an historical record of the previous sales of a
’ prescription drug required by s. 499.0121(6)(d), F.S., to be provided by a prescription.drug
wholesaler distributing a prescription drug to another prescription drug wholesaler when the
disiributing wholesaler is not the authorized distributor of record forthe prescription drug which
is the ‘Subject of the transaction. The pedigree paper is required to be provided in addition to an
invoice or other business records documenting the distribution of a prescription drug.
. . (12) Habana Hospital Pharmacy sold prescription drugs to Armenia Surgery Center, a
person not authorized to purchase and possess prescription drugs and therefore violated s.”
499.005(15), F.S. Armenia Surgery Center did not hold any type of permit issued by the
Department of Health or any other state agency at the time of the transaction that authorized the
purchase and possession of prescription drugs. See Exhibit 37, which is attached to and by
reference made a part of this complaint. B&B
(13) Habana Pharmacy does not now meet the requirements for a retail pharmacy
wholesaler permit pursuant to ss. 499.01 and 499.012(1)(c), F.S., as elaborated in Exhibit 41,
which is attached to and by reference made a part of this complaint. Furthermore, Habana
Pharmacy purchases prescription drugs at prices other than fair market value’ for retail
el cee
ete ae ceca a
SO WEIR PepoR ore
,
pharmacies because it is a member of several group purchasing organizations. Specifically,
Habana Pharmacy purchases prescription drugs under Innovatix Alternative Homecare and
PBI-Home Infusion Provider/Retail Pharmacy Combo gfoup purchasing arrangements. To bea
member of either of these purchasing arrangements the member must serve a unique or special
patient population. Moreover, ‘ ‘own use” restrictions in these group purchasing arrangements ‘
preciude the wholesale ‘distribution of prescription drugs purchased | thereunder. Therefore
Habana Pharmacy does not qualify for a retail pharmacy wholesaler permit because itis a
health care entity and does not purchase prescription drugs at fair market prices for retail
pharmacies.
(14) Section 499.067(1), F.S., authorizes the department to deny, suspend, or revoke
a permit if it finds that there has been a substantial failure to comply with ss. 499.001 -499.081 or
‘chapter 465, chapter 893, or chapter 501, or the rules adopted under any of those sections or
chapters. Subparagraph (b) of that subsection authorizes the department to deny an application
for a permit if it is shown that the applicant is not of good moral character or that it would be a
danger or not in the best interest of the public health, safety, and welfare if the applicant were
issued a permit. -
(15) In addition, s. 499:067(3)(c), F.S., authorizes the department to deny, suspend or
revoke a permit if the permit was obtained by misrepresentation of fraud or through a mistake of
the department, or if the permittee has violated any provisions of ss. 499.001-499.081 or rules
adopted under those sections. : &
(16) | Habana Pharmacy’s wholesale distributions of prescription drugs to prescription
drug wholesalers, totaling in excess of $ 2.7 million in a one-year period, represent a substantial
failure to comply with the Act. In addition, the recordkeeping deficiencies and lack of a clear
audit trail related to the wholesale distribution of prescription drugs by both Habana Pharmacy
Co pcrgene epraere op peemee
Pepe oe cpae
,
:
and Habana Wholesale not only represent a substantial failure to comply with the Act, but
- present a public health threat because the absence of accurate records obscures the movement
of prescription drugs. This in turn creates an environment that fosters the diversion of
prescription drugs and the introduction of adulterated and counterfeit drugs into the
marketplace. "Accurate and complete recordkeeping is integral to the federally mandated and ~
state implemented requirements for the regulation of prescription drugs to protect the safety and
integrity of prescription drugs in this country and more particularly, in Florida. Furthermore, the
: misleading representations made by Walter Dykes regarding the extent of prescription drug
wholesaling activities conducted by Habana Pharmacy impeded the department’s ability to
protect the public health. Moreover, Mr. Dykes’ misleading or inaccurate representations call
into question any future communications regarding his establishments’ activities regulated under
chapter 499. Finally, since Habana Pharmacy does not meet the definition of a retail pharmacy
but is consideréd a health care enitity, and the fact that it actually purchases prescription drugs
at other than fair market prices, it is not in the best interest of the public health, safety and
‘welfare for the bureau to issue a ‘permit that would appear to authorize the wholesale
: distribution of these prescription drugs. Issuing .a permit that authorizes the wholesale
distribution of prescription drugs facilitates the pharmacy, either intentionally or unintentionally,
to violate the Act. Therefore, the continued authority for Habana Pharmacy and Habana
Wholesale to engage in the wholesale distribution of prescription drugs under permits 24:00242
and 22:01066, respectively, poses a danger and is not in the best intergst of the public health,
safety and welfare. Accordingly, the bureau seeks to deny renewal f permit number 24:00242
and revoke permit number 22:01066.
(17) Rule 64F-12.024 (4), Fla. Admin. Code, sets the range of the penalty that will
normally be imposed for violations of the Act. Based on this rule, the bureau imposes an
eee adneere ate
=
cemre os
SRE RE Or REE RNR ER EERE PHP RE Re REE oR
administrative fine against Habana Hospital Pharmacy Inc., and Walter E. Dykes in the amount
of $96,500. This total administrative fine is comprised of the following elements:
(a) . Paragraph (8) alleges the violation of s. 499.005(14), F.S., for which the bureau
seeks $1,000 for each of the 22 invoices, for a total of $22,000. This falls within the range
allowed by rule. an . _
(b) Paragraph (9) alleges the violation of ss. 499.005(15) and (22), and
499.012(2)(d)4., F.S., for which the bureau seeks $2,000 each of the 21 invoices, for a total of
$42,000. This falls within the range allowed by rule.
(c).. Paragraph (10) alleges the violation of s. 499.005(19), F.S., for which the bureau
seeks $5,000 for this violation and revocation of permit 24:00242 and 22:01066 because of the
severity and repetitiveness of the offense. This falls within the range allowed by rule.
(d). Paragraph (11) alleges the violation of s. 499.005(1 8), F.S., for which the bureau.
seeks a total of $27,250 for all components in this violation and revocation of permit 24:00242 ,
and permit 22:01066. The intended fine of $27,250 is calculated as follows: $10,000 (5
invoices * $2,000 each) for not having the seller identified on the invoice; $250 for not including
the purchaser’s license number on any of the invoices; $250 for not including-the date on some °
, of the invoices; $250 for not fully identifying the prescription drug on the invoice; $10,000 (4
invoices * $2,500 each) for not having any records of purchase for prescription drugs sold;
$5,500 (22 transactions * $250 each) for not having transfer documentation from. Habana
Pharmacy to Habana Wholesale; and $1,000 (lump sum) for not maintaining and providing
pedigree papers. These fall within the range allowed by rule. ,
(e) Paragraph (12) alleges the violation s. 499.005(15), F.S., for which the bureau
seeks $250 for this violation. This falls within the range allowed by rule.
10
cee meer ee Open geen mr
ee ee ie i ee i
Se oe
Eee
(18) You have the right to request an administrative hearing pursuant to sections
120.569 and 120.57, F.S., if you wish to challenge the intended agency action. Such
proceedings are governed by Rule 28-106, Florida Administrative Code.
In order to obtain a formal proceeding under section 120.57(1), F.S., your request for an
administrative . hearing must conform to the requirements of Rule 28-1 06. 201, Florida
Administrative Code, and must state which issues of material fact you dispute. Failure to
dispute material issues of fact in your request for a hearing may be treated by the department
as an election by you of an informal proceeding pursuant to section 120.57(2), F.S.
A petition for administrative hearing must be in writing and must be received by Mr.
Theodore M. Henderson, Agency Clerk for the Department, within twenty-one (21) days from’
the receipt of this order. The address of the Agency Clerk is 4052 Bald Cypress Way, BIN #
A02, Tallahassee FL 32399- 4703. The Agency Clerk’s facsimile number i is 850-410-1448,
Mediation i is not available as an alternative remedy.
7 Your failure to submit a petition for hearing within 21 days from receipt of this complaint
will constitute a waiver of your tight to an administrative hearing, under Florida Administrative
Code Rule 28-106.111 and this complaint shall become a "final order". , .
Should this complaint become a final order, a party who is adversely affected by it is
entitled to judicial review pursuant to section 120.68, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are
governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings may be commenced
by filing one copy of a Notice of Appeal with the Agency Clerk of the Depatiment of Health and .
a second copy, accompanied by the filing fees required by law, with the Court of Appeal in the
appropriate District Court. The notice must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the final order.
(19) The undersigned certifies that a true copy of this administrative complaint was
sent by U.S. Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to Mr. Walter E. Dykes, R.Ph., Habana
11
Sr eee oe
Ceres ee cope
Hospital Pharmacy, Inc., at 4710 N. Habana Avenue, Suite 101, Tampa, Florida 33614 and to
the attorney for Habana Hospital Pharmacy, Inc., Charles E. Bergmann, Esquire, at One Urban
ath
Centre, Suite 750, 4830 W. Kennedy Boulevard, Tampa, Florida 33609 this Ze
day of 1 Mie phe 2001.
ief o harmacy Services
2818-A Mahan Drive
. Tallahassee, Florida 32308
-? . Telephone: (850) 922-5190
Copy also furnished to: ,
Counsel for the Department:
Robert P. Daniti
Senior Attorney
4052 Bald Cypress Way Bin #A02
Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -
(850) 245-4005
Se
12
SORE ORT RE TRE RENEE fee mtr ETO
ret
Soe mE RRR
SOR OU TERRE oo RRR RE
SER
Docket for Case No: 02-000577
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
May 29, 2002 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
May 28, 2002 |
Joint Motion to Remand and Settlement Agreement filed.
|
May 24, 2002 |
Agreed Motion to Cancel Final Hearing (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
May 14, 2002 |
Notice of Service of Answers to Respondent`s First Set of Interrogatories (filed via facsimile).
|
Apr. 01, 2002 |
Notice of Service of Respondent`s First Set of Interrogatories filed.
|
Mar. 06, 2002 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Mar. 06, 2002 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for June 5 through 7, 2002; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
|
Mar. 04, 2002 |
Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (2), W. Dykes, H. Hospital (filed via facsimile).
|
Feb. 27, 2002 |
Letter to Judge Smith, et. al.`s from C. Bergmann requesting removal from certificate of service filed.
|
Feb. 26, 2002 |
Notice of Compliance with Initial Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Feb. 20, 2002 |
Exhibits to Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Feb. 19, 2002 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Feb. 15, 2002 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Feb. 15, 2002 |
Request for Formal Proceedings filed.
|
Feb. 15, 2002 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|