Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING HOME ADMINISTRATORS
Respondent: PETER SCHOEN
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: West Palm Beach, Florida
Filed: Mar. 04, 2002
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, April 10, 2002.
Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2024
Sable i ll ek,
eae
eli eck, Mile li Nl RE a i ek A, i lil ai
CR-GU fC
STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED. CEGAL
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
032 see. BMP}: Heo.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
BOARD OF NURSING HOME ADMINISTRATORS,
Petitioner,
vs. : Case Number: 2001-05898
PETER SCHOEN,
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE.COMPLAINT .
COMES NOW, the Petitioner, Department of Health, hereinafter referred to as
“Petitioner, and Files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Nursing Home
Administrators against Peter Schoen, hereinafter referred to as “Respondent”, and alleges:
1. Effective July 1, 1997, Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the
practice of Nursing Home Administration pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida Statutes; Chapter
456, Florida Statutes; and Chapter 468, Florida Statutes. Pursuant to the authority of Section
20.43(3)(g), Florida Statutes, the Petitioner has contracted with the Agency for Health Care
Administration to provide consumer complaint, investigative, and prosecutorial services required
by the Division of Medical Quality Assurance, councils, or boards as appropriate including the
issuance of'eyhergency orders of suspension or restriction.
2. Respondent is, and has been at all time material hereto, a licensed Nursing Home
Administrator in the State of Florida, having be n issued license numbe NHA
3. | Respondent’s last known address is 956 “Mockingbird Land, Plantation,
Florida 33324-3441.
Seca ALA oi de cise
a
4
4. At all times material hereto Respondent was the Nursing Home Administrator at
Sunbridge Care and Rehabilitation for Palm Beach (Sunbridge).
5. On February 19-21, 2001, a survey was conducted by the Agency for Health Care
Administration (AHCA), at Sunbridge based on the annual Recertification survey. This survey
found that the facility was not in substantial compliance with requirements, as set forth ‘on the
Form 2567 dated February 21, 2001. The survey contained deficiencies in several categories
including:
Sa. . The Respondent failed to ensure that resident dignity and respect were
maintained.
5b. | The Respondent did not schedule and implement enough activities designed
to meet the interests and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident,
especially the cognitively impaired.
5c. The Respondent failed to ensure that services provided or arranged by the
facility must meet professional standards of quality.
5d. | The Respondent did not ensure that Resident(s) who are unable to carry out
activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal and
oral hygiene.
Se. The Respondent did not ensure that residents who did not have pressure
sores when they entered the facility, did not develop pressure sores while residing in the facility
5f. | The Respondent failed to rovide physician vis
provide physician visits every 60-70 days to promote a pattem of care to maintain and or
improve the resident’s level of independent functioning and continuity of. care as 1s needed.
i ak ili a si
i ih A a i
5g. The Respondent failed to verify the qualifications of individuals working in
the facility as nurses aides.
6. On or about April 4-6, 2001, the Agency revisited the facility and found that the - /
deficiencies in paragraph 5, above, [except for paragraph “”] still existed or were repeated .
following the February survey.
7. It is the ultimate responsibility of the Nursing Home Administrator to insure the
health safety and welfare of the residents. Based on the numerous deficiencies found by the
surveyors, the Respondent was negligent or incompetent in the practice of nursing home
administration.
8. Failure to timely correct the deficiencies that were found in the February 2001
survey, by the time of the re-survey in April 2001, shows that the Administrator has repeatedly
acted in a manner inconsistent with the health, safety and welfare of the residents, and has
breached the standard of care owed to residents.
9. Based on the foregoing, Respondent’s license to practice nursing home
administration is subject to discipline pursuant to Section 468.1755 (1)(h), Florida Statutes, for
negligence, incompetence, or misconduct in the practice of nursing home administration; Section
468.1755 (1)(), Florida Statutes, for repeatedly acting in a manner inconsistent with the health,
safety, or welfare. ofthe patients of the facility in which he or she is the administrator, and
Section 468.1755(1)(n) for wilfully or repeatedly violating any of the "provisions of the law,
code or rules of the licensing or supervising authority or or agency of the s state e oF politcal
subdivision thereof having jurisdiction of the operation and licensing of nurs 2g ‘homes.
ree ae
vi
taille 8a
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of Nursing Home
Administrators enter an order imposing one or more of the following penalties: revocation or
suspension of the Respondent’s license, restriction of the Respondent’s practice, imposition of an
administrative fine, issuance of a reprimand, ‘placement of the Respondent on probation, and/or
any other relief that the Board deems appropriate.
SIGNED this An. day of 2002.
John O. Agwunobi, MD, MBA
Secretary, Department Of Health
ancy Snurkowski, Chief
On Behalf of Agency for
Health Care Administration
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER:
yaa Mary Denise O'Brien, Sr. Attorney b
Florida Bar 306754 EPARTMENT OF HEALT
Agency for Health Care Administration EP Uy CLERK
2727 Mahan Drive CLERK WhiR, Leno
Tallahassee, Florida 32308 DATE 3
(850) 922-0004 l Llo2
PCP: Terry Goodman and Mary Goehring
DATE: — January 28, 2002
Docket for Case No: 02-000931PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Apr. 10, 2002 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Apr. 09, 2002 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed via facsimile).
|
Mar. 18, 2002 |
Notice of Substitution of Counsel (filed M. Carlson via facsimile).
|
Mar. 13, 2002 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Mar. 13, 2002 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for May 6 and 7, 2002; 9:30 a.m.; West Palm Beach, FL).
|
Mar. 12, 2002 |
Joint Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Mar. 05, 2002 |
Notice of Serving Discovery to Respondent (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Mar. 04, 2002 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Mar. 04, 2002 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Mar. 04, 2002 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Mar. 04, 2002 |
Initial Order issued.
|