Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs COLLEGE PARK SALON, 05-001556 (2005)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 05-001556 Visitors: 26
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Respondent: COLLEGE PARK SALON
Judges: WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Orlando, Florida
Filed: May 02, 2005
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, May 11, 2005.

Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA _. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION _ COSMETOLOGY BOARD 20h HAY -2 Pb 38 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND bays : trey AUP RATIVE PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, AUHESTRA HEARINGS Petitioner, vs. Case No. 2004-058254 — a“ COLLEGE PARK SALON, } v~ Respondent. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION (“Department”), files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Cosmetology, against COLLEGE PARK SALON (“Respondent”), and says: 1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of cosmetology pursuant to section 20.165, Florida Statute, and Chapters 455 and 477, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated thereto. 2. At all times material hereto, Respondent was licensed as a cosmetology salon in the State of Florida, holding license CE 9961609. 3. Respondent’s address of record is 1321 Edgewater Drive, Orlando, Florida 32804. 4, On or about December 4, 2004, Petitioner Inspector, Michelle Peterson, conducted a routine inspection of Respondent salon. 5. During the inspection, Petitioner Inspector observed Respondent salon open and conducting business. 6. During the inspection, Petitioner Inspector observed that the salon had no EPA approved disinfectant on the premises. 7. Chapter 61G5-20.002(2)(d), Florida Administration Code, states in pertinent part that “[a]ll salons shall be equipped with and utilize wet sanitizers with hospital level disinfectant or EPA approved disinfectant, sufficient to allow for disinfecting practices.” 8. Section 477.029(1)(i), Florida Statutes, states that it is unlawful to “fvJiolate or refuse to comply with any provision of [Chapter 477] or Chapter 455 or a rule or Final Order of the Board.” 9. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated section 477.029(1)(i), Florida Statutes by not having any EPA approved disinfectant on the premises, and is thereby subject to discipline pursuant to section 477.029(2), Florida Statutes. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board of Cosmetology enter a Final Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: imposition of an administrative fine, revocation or suspension of Respondent’s license, issuance of a reprimand, placement of the Respondent on probation, restriction of Respondent’s practice, and or any other relief which the Board deems appropriate. at | SIGNED this 4 ayo by , 2005. FILED | Department of Business and Professional Regulation ALG x Princ DEPUTY CLERK Charles F. Tunnicliff CLERK M Nichole Attorney for Petitioner: Charles F. Tunnicliff Chief Professions Attomey Florida Bar No. 153831 Department of Business and Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202 Phone: (850) 487-9656 Facsimile: (850) 414-6749 CFT/jbm February 18, 2005 Case # 2004-058254 Pe >-2b-05 CF

Docket for Case No: 05-001556
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer