Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: HEALTH ENVIRONMENT MEDICAL CENTER CORP., D/B/A HEALTH ENVIRONMENT MEDICAL CENTER CORP.
Judges: CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Dec. 12, 2005
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, March 8, 2006.
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2024
-NOV-23-2005 WED 02:35 PH Shutts and Bowen FAA NU, sUos0lesoe
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR
HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner, : “AHICA No.: 2005008930
; Retum Receipt Requested
VS. 7002 2410 0001 4234 7203
. 7002 2410 0001 4234 7524
HEALTH ENVIRONMENT MEDICAL CENTER
CORP., d/b/a HEALTH ENVIRONMENT MEDICAL
CENTER CORP.,
Respondent.
/
i
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT.
The STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRA-
TION (hereinafter “AFCA” or the “A gency”), by and through its undersigned counsel,
hereby files and serves this ADMINISTRATIVE.COMPLAINT against Respondent,
HEALTH ENVIRONMENT MEDICAL CENTER CORP., d/b/a HEALTH
ENVIRONMENT MEDICAL CENTER CORP., pursuant to Sections 120.569, and
120.57, Florida Statutes (2005), and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an administrative action to revoke or suspend Respondent’s health care
clinic license, number HCC 5760, and to impose administrative fines totaling TEN
THOUSAND DOLLARS AND NO/100 (310,000.00) pursuant to Sections 400.9935 and
400.995, Florida Statutes (2005), for non-compliance with the Health Care Clinic Act.
_NOV-23-2005 WED 02:36 PM Shutts and Bowen rAA NU, SU0o0 1} dooe
; JURISDICTION & VENUE
2. AHCA has jurisdiction pursuant to its regulatory authority under the Health
Care Clinic Act (“Act”), Chapter 400, Part XII, Florida Statutes (2005). In the event that
Respondent requests a formal hearing in the manner required by law and AHCA
thereafter refers the case to the Division of Administrative Hearings (““DOAH ”, then
DOAH will have jurisdiction pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes
(2005).
3, Venue for any formal hearing shall be determined pursuant to Rule 28-
106.207, Florida Administrative Code. )
4. Tn the event Respondent requests an informal hearing (i.e., no dispute as to the
underlying material facts), then the Agency will refer the matter to an informal hearing
officer who will hear the matter as to any argument as to the application of the Jaw to the
undisputed underlying facts pertaining to the suspension or revocation, and fines.
PARTIES
5, AHICA is the regulatory agency responsible for the licensure of Florida health
care clinics and for the implementation and enforcement of the Act, including in
particular the licensure of non-exempt infusion clinics engaged in providing infusion
therapy services to patients in a clinic setting (outpatient) rather than a hospital setting.
6. HEALTH ENVIRONMENT MEDICAL CENTER CORP., owns, operates
and is doing business as HEALTH ENVIRONMENT MEDICAL CENTER CORP
(“Respondent”), Respondent's principal business address js 358 Hast 6 Street Hialeah,
nN
. NOV-23-2005 WED 02:36 PH Shutts and Bowen FAK NO, 309301 dee
FL 33010. Respondent's mailing address is 358 E. 6 Street Hialesh, FL 33010. The
Clinic is located at 3750 West 16" Ave., Hialeah, Florida 33012. .
7, Atall times material to this proceeding Respondent has been engaged and is
now enpaged in providing infusion therapy services to patients. Respondent is licensed
to operate the Clinic under license number HCC 5766, issued to Respondent by the
Agency on or about June 17, 2004.
8. At all times material hereto, Respondent was required to comply with the Act.
"INFUSION THERAPY SERVICES
9, Many patients with HIV infection need intravenous (IV) therapy a at some point
in the course of their treatment. While IV therapy generally is provided in hospital
settings, in some circumstances it can be provided properly in an outpatient setting, either
jn the home or in an outpatient infusion center such as Respondent's Clinic.
10. Intravenous therapy is the therapeutic infusion and/or injection of substances
through the venous peripheral system, consisting of activity which includes: observing,
initiating, monitoring, disoontisuing, maintaining, regulating, adjusting, documenting,
planning, intervening and evaluating, as recognized by administrative rule in Florida.
See Rule 64B9-12.002 (1), defining intravenous therapy.
11, Outpatient infusion therapy at infusion clinics includes administration of
nutrition, antibiotic therapy, and fluid and electrolyte repletion. Such outpatient IV
therapy has risks. Most notable are potential serious adverse effects of administered
medications and the possibility of thrombosis and infection related to IV catheters.
12. The drugs used in infusion therapy, some of which have been used by
Respondent, are dangerous if not administered carefully and properly as to each patient.
NOV-23-20U9 WED Uc so rit onutis anda Gowen
PAA NU. QUo90lauoc id
13. In an outpatient infusion clinic’setting, adverse events can be difficult to
monitor and manage as to the clinic’s patients. )
14. Bach infusion clinic must determine the suitability of individual patients for
outpatient TV therapy. Patients who do not meet certain criteria are not good candidates
for complex outpatient infusion therapy. Further, clinically unstable patients should not
be considered for complex outpatient IV therapy.
15. ‘The relative cost of infusion therapy services is very expensive in comparison
with most ather kinds of health care services provided in health care clinics generally.
Such significant cost for infusion therapy services, as provided or rendered by infusion
clinics as well as hospitals, is almost universally billed to Medicare, which is the case as
to the infusion services provided by Respondent.
16. As to this relative cost of infusion therapy services, the cost of a single
infusion given to an individual AIDS/HIV patient is often in the thousands of dollars,
. even more than $10,000 for a single infusion session. The relatively high expense of
infusion therapy services generally applies to services that have been and are being
rendered by Respondent to its patients. Patients of infusion clinics, including the subject
clinic, often receive mitltiple treatments or infusions ina single week, sometimes even
twice in a single day, and such treatments often continue for many weeks, sometimes
months.
17. Inshort, the nature and cost of infusion therapy services, especially as
provided in an outpatient clinic setting, place a high degree of responsibility upon any
clinic licensee with respect to assuring not only the health, safety and welfare of patients
’ of the clinic.
- NOV-23-2005 WED 02:38 PH Shutks and Bowen FAA NQ, sUase lose roi
THE FLORIDA HEALTH CARE CLINIC ACT
AS DEA
18. The Act establishes the role and importance of an appointed medical director
or clinic director in Florida health care clinics generally, and expressly requires that each
licensed clinic must place its “clinic responsibilities” in the hands of its medical director
or clinic director, who in turn must agree in writing to accept legal responsibility for
certain specified activities, as follows:
400.9935 Clinic responsibilities.--
(1) Each clinic shall appoint a medical director or clinic director who
shall agree in writing to accept legal responsibility for the following
activities on behalf of the clinic. The medical director or the clinic director
shall: :
(a) Have signs identifying the medical director or clinic director posted in
a conspicuous location within the clinic readily visible to all patients.
(b) Ensure that all practitioners providing health care services or supplies
‘to patients maintain a current active and unencumbered Florida license.
(c) Review any patient referral contracts or agreements executed by the
clinic, ° :
(d) Ensure that all health care practitioners at the clinic have active
appropriate certification or licensure for the level of care being provided.
(e) Serve as the clinic records owner as defined in section 456.057
(f) Ensure compliance with the recordkeeping, office surgery, and adverse
incident reporting requirements of chapter 456, the respective practice
acts, and rules.adopted under this part.
(g) Conduct systematic reviews of clinic billings to ensure that the
billings are not fraudulent or unlawful. Upon discovery of an unlawful
charge, the medical director or clinic director shall take immediate
corrective action, * * * *
19. §400.991(7)(a) of the Act expressly contemplates that aclinic’s medical or
clinic director or similarly titled person shall be “responsible for the day-to-day operation
of the licensed clinic... .”
20. The Act provides the Agency with the express authority to revoke a clinic
license in two separate provisions within the Act, as follows:
NQV-e3-cUU9 WED Ue so FM onulls and bowen PRA NU, 30050 ldgGe
a. §400.9935 of the Act, regarding clinic responsibilities, authorizes the
Agency to revoke the license of any clinic and states as follows:
(7) The agency may fine, or suspend or revoke the license of, any clinic
licensed under this part for operating in violation of the requirements of
this part or the rules adopted by the agency.
b. §400.995 ofthe Act, regarding Agency administrative penalties, states:
(1) The agency may deny the application for a license renewal, revoke or
suspend the license, and impose administrative fines of up ta $5,000
per violation for violations of the requirements of this part or rules of
the agency. ‘
91, As indicated in the preceding paragraph, in addition to authorizing the Agency
to revoke or suspend a health care clinic license, Section 400.995(1), Florida Statues
(2005), also authorizes the Agency to impose fines of up to FIVE THOUSAND AND
NO/100 DOLLARS ($5000.00) per violation of Chapter 400, Part XIIL, Florida Statutes
(2005).
NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TBE ACT
22. On September 28, 2005, the Agency with its authorized personnel conducted —
an unannounced onsite inspection (hersinafter referred to as the “survey”) of the subject
clinic to determine compliance with the Act. On that date, the Agency’s surveyor and
other members of the survey team observed and substantiated following facts:
a. that Respondent has been licensed to operate for the period from June
17, 2004 to the present time;
b. thal Respondent provided infusion therapy services dunng that period;
c. that Respondent tendered charges for infusion therapy Bervices
provided or ostensibly provided to its patients during that period, for which
infusion therapy services or ostensible infusion therapy services Respondent
sought reimbursement from third parties inchiding Medicare; and
_ NOV-23-2005 WED 02:36 PH Shutts and Bowen TAA NU, gUoa0luv0c
d. that Respondent, by and through its representatives present at the clinic
at the time of the survey, knew ofits legal obligation to have a medical or clinic
director who agreed in writing to accept and carry out the legal responsibilities of
said clinic as delineated in §400.9935 of the Act;
e. that the owner of the clinic, Mr. Arturo Garcia, stated to the surveyors
and inspectors on September 28, 2005, that Dr. Julio Pino was the clinic’s medical
director;
{ that Respondent was not able to produce a written agreement signed by
Dr, Pino showing that he has accepted the responsibilities of being the medical
director for the clinic pursuant to §400.9935(1) of the Act;
g. that Respondent had instead a signed contract with Dr. Alphonso
Ramirez, whose name was on the entry door and the Medical Director’s office as
medical director pursuant to § 400.9935(1) and § 400.9935(1)(a) of the Act; |
h. that Dr, Ramirez has not been working for this clinic for the past three
months.
j. that Dr. Julio Pino was interviewed by the surveyors and inspectors on
September 28, 2005, and Dr, Pino stated that he would cease to be the clinic’s
medical director after October 1, 2005;
j. that Dr, Julio Pino stated that medical assistants, Angel Betancourt and
Ammerys Garcia, have been preparing and administering infusion therapy
medications to patients; neither Mr. Betancourt nor Ms. Garcia are qualified to
give infusion therapy because neither one is a registered nurse or a licensed
practical nurse.
23, The conduct and omissions of Respondent constitutes non-compliance with
§400.9935(1) of the Act and warrants and legally justifies the revocation or suspension of
Respondent’s subject license.
94. The facts indicate that individuals who are not qualified to do so have. been
providing infusion therapy to the clinic’s patients,
25. Certain non-physician health care providers are authorized by law to perform
intravenous therapy. See e.g., Chapter 6489-12, Florida Administrative Code (2005)
is
. NOV-23-2005 WED Q2:36 rl shutts ana Bowen TRA NY. sbosoledae
1
'
(authorizing licensed practical nurses ito perform intravenous therapy). However, the
applicable statutory provision setting forth the duties and responsibilities a medical
assistant may undertake under the direct supervision and responsibility of a licensed
physician does not authorize medicallassjstanls to perform intravenous therapy. See,
Section 458.3485, Florida Statutes (2005).
;
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
tL
1. Respondent’s medical director, Dr. Julio Pina, did not have a signed,
written agreement evincing that he has decepted the Ipgal responsibilities of being the
medical director for the clinic. Such failure is a violation of Section 400.9935(1), Florida
Statutes (2005), subjecting the respondent to:
(a) a fine of FIVE THOUSAND) AND NO/1N0 DOLLARS ($3,000.00), pursuant
to Section 400.995(1), Florida Statues (2005), and/or
(b) revocation or suspension ofithe Respondent's health care clinic license
(HICC5760), pursuant to Sections 400.9935(7) and 400.995(1), Florida Statutes (2005).
. 2. Furthermore, based upon the determination that two medical assistants
were performing intravenous therasy, a type of therhpy that a medical assistant is not
authorized to perform, the Agency determined that Julio Pina, M.D., the Respondent’s
medical director, failed to ensure that all health care practitioners at the clinic have active
appropriate certification or licensure for the level of care being provided. Such failure is
aviolation of Section 400.9935(1){d), Blorida Statytes (2005), subjecting the respondent
to:
IV
NOV-e3~cUU9 WED Ucrod rH onutts and Bowen
PHA WU. JUJI0LOddEe
(a) a fine of FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($5,000.00), pursuant
to Section 400.995(1), Florida Statues (2005), and/or
(b) revocation or suspension of the Respondent’s health care clinic license
(HICC5760), pursuant to Sections 400,9935(7) and 400.995(1), Florida Statutes (2005).
3. The conduct and omisaions of Respondent as set forth herein constitute -
non-compliance with and violations of Sections 400,9935(1) and 400.9935(1)(d) Florida.
Statutes (2005). Such violations warrant and legally justify the following:
(a) the imposition of a total fine of TEN THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS
($10,000.00) and/or in the alternative: .
(b) the revocation or suspension of Respondent’s license to operate a health care
clinic pursuant to Section 400.995(1), or alternatively Section 400.9935(7), Florida
Statutes (2005). . )
WHEREBY, the Petitioner, State of Florida Agency for Health Care
Administration requests the above-stated relief.
Respectfully submitted this yay of November, 2005.
Trin LawtoréRussell, Esq.
Assistant General Counsel
Agency for Health Care Administration
_ 8350 N.W. 52 Terrace - #103
Miami, Florida 33166
305-470-6805
tt
_ , NOV-23-2005 WED 02:36 PH Shubts and Bowen FAA NU, alasolodbe re oto
cod TO yt
NOTICE Bae BS
Respondent is notified that it has a right to request an administrative hearing # Zz 2
pursuant to Sections 120.569 ‘and 120.57, Florida Statutes. Specific options for .
idministrative review of the relief sought herein are set out in the attached Election of
Rights form and explained in the attached Explanation of Rights form.
All requests for hearing shall be made to the Agency for Health Care
Administration and delivered to:
” Mr. Richard Shoop, Agency Clerk
Agency for Health Care Administration
Building #3, MSC #3
2.727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Please also furnish a copy thereof to the above-named AHCA Assistant General
Counsel who prepared and signed this Administrative Complaint (see address below
signature). ; . ;
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE AGENCY MUST
RECEIVE A REQUEST FOR HEARING WITHIN 21 DAYS OF RECEIPT: OF
THIS PLEADING BY RESPONDENT. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL
CONSTITUTE AN ADMISSION OF THE FACTS ALLEGED HEREIN AND
RESULT IN ENTRY OF A FINAL ORDER BY THE AGENCY CONSISTENT
WITH THE ACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THE AGENCY IN THIS
PLEADING.
_ Copies furnished to:
Diane Lopez Castillo
Field Office Manager
Agency for Health Care Administration
8355 NW 53” Street, 1" Floor
Miami, Florida 33166 —
(interoffice Mail)
Jean Lombardi °
Finance and Accounting
Agency for Health Care
Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
10 0 je
. NOV-23-2005 WED 02:37 PM shutts and Bowen NU, JUO00ldd0e
Health Care Clinics Unit Program
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
_ THEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent by
U.S. Mail Certified Return Receipt Requested to Mr, Arturo Garcia, owner and registered.
agent for Health Environment Medical Center, Corp., 358 East 6 Street, Hialeah, Florida
33010 and Health Environment Medical Center Corp.. 3750 W. 16" Avenue, Hialeah,
Florida 33012 on this Thay of Rpuemben,
a Lawton-Russell, Esquire
Ww
Docket for Case No: 05-004522
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Mar. 08, 2006 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Mar. 08, 2006 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Mar. 06, 2006 |
Order Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for April 11 and 12, 2006; 9:00 a.m.; Miami, FL).
|
Mar. 01, 2006 |
Order Requiring Petitioner to File Amended Discovery Request (Respondent shall have a period of twenty days from its receipt of the discovery requests to respond to same, which shall be served by express delivery).
|
Feb. 21, 2006 |
Respondent`s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Petitioner`s Discovery Requests filed.
|
Feb. 13, 2006 |
AHCA`s Notice of Substitution of Counsel (filed by T. Moore).
|
Feb. 10, 2006 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for March 28 and 29, 2006; 9:00 a.m.; Miami, FL).
|
Feb. 09, 2006 |
Joint Motion for Continuance filed.
|
Feb. 06, 2006 |
Notice of Service of Petitioner`s Response to Respondnet`s First Request for Interrogatories filed.
|
Feb. 02, 2006 |
Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Feb. 02, 2006 |
Petitioner`s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Charging Document filed.
|
Feb. 02, 2006 |
Order Granting Motion to Amend.
|
Feb. 02, 2006 |
Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Feb. 02, 2006 |
Petitioner`s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Charging Document filed.
|
Jan. 30, 2006 |
Order Denying Respondent`s Motion for Summary Final Order and Denying Petitioner`s Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction.
|
Jan. 23, 2006 |
Notice of Service of Petitioner`s Request for Admissions filed.
|
Jan. 23, 2006 |
Petitioner`s First Set of Interrogatories filed.
|
Jan. 23, 2006 |
Agency`s First Request for Production filed.
|
Jan. 23, 2006 |
Notice of Service of Petitioner`s First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents filed.
|
Jan. 06, 2006 |
Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s Motion for Summary Final Order and Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Jan. 04, 2006 |
Motion for Summary Final Order filed.
|
Jan. 03, 2006 |
Respondent`s First Request for Production to Petitioner filed.
|
Jan. 03, 2006 |
Respondent`s First Set of Interrogatories to Petitioner filed.
|
Dec. 20, 2005 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Dec. 20, 2005 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for February 23, 2006; 9:00 a.m.; Miami, FL).
|
Dec. 19, 2005 |
Notice of Unavailability filed.
|
Dec. 19, 2005 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Dec. 13, 2005 |
Initial Order.
|
Dec. 12, 2005 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Dec. 12, 2005 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Dec. 12, 2005 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|