Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs JORGE REINOSO, 06-002740PL (2006)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 06-002740PL Visitors: 19
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY
Respondent: JORGE REINOSO
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Jul. 31, 2006
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, September 6, 2006.

Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2024
; STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATON COSMETOLOGY BOARD Uy DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Petitioner, vs. Case No. 2006-011181 JORGE REINOSO, Ole D7 U0 p L Respondent. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION (“Department”), files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Cosmetology, against JORGE REINOSO (“Respondent”), and says: 1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of cosmetology pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 477, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated thereto. 2, Respondent’s address of record is 6339 SW 69" Street, Miami, Florida 33143. 3. At all times material hereto, Respondent was licensed in the State of Florida as a cosmetologist, having been issued license CL 232479. 4, On or about February 25, 2006, Petitioner’s inspector, Idelmis Delrio, conducted a routine inspection of THE CLASSIC BARBER SHOP. 5. At all times material hereto, Respondent was the owner of THE CLASSIC BARBER SHOP (CE 9964700). 6. During the inspection, Petitioner’s inspector observed GUADALUPE HERRERA cutting a customer’s hair for twelve dollars. 7. During the inspection, Department of Business and Professional State of Florida. 8. Section 477.0265(1)(b)2, Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part that it is unlawful for any person to “[o]wn, operate, maintain, open, establish, conduct, or have charge of, either alone or with another person or persons, a cosmetology salon or specialty salon: in which a person not licensed or registered as a cosmetologist or a specialist is permitted to perform cosmetology services or any specialty.” 9. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 477.029(1)(i), Florida Statutes, by allowing HERRERA to practice cosmetology without a license, and is thereby subject to discipline pursuant to Sections 477.029(1)(h) and (2), Florida Statutes. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board of Cosmetology enter a Final Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: imposition of an administrative fine, revocation or suspension of the Respondent's license, issuance ofa reprimand, placement of the Respondent on probation, restriction of Respondent's practice, and or any other relief which the Board deems appropriate. SIGNED this say of May, , 2006. Charles F. Tunnicliff Chief Professions Attorney Attorney for Petitioner: ++ --------—-Charles-F-Funnieliff Sareea - + - |-~- E -—--- Fo te ot ee ee ee Chief Professions Attorney Departm F , . Department of Business and mune w AGENCY CleR Peauition Professional Regulation 1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202 Phone: (850) 487-8435 CLERK Say d, (etm ovr 9-23 -200l Facsimile: (850) 414-6749 DATE a CFT/jjc Case # 2006-011181 PUP date 5-1?-b6

Docket for Case No: 06-002740PL
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer