Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY
Respondent: VOGUE SALON
Judges: DIANE CLEAVINGER
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Marianna, Florida
Filed: Aug. 18, 2006
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, September 21, 2006.
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION?) f=
COSMETOLOGY BOARD BE Gems Ho
200 WE 18 A le 54
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, , fr Mt ; 4 ON F
ADMINISTRATIVE
Petitioner, HEARINGS
vs. Case No. 2006-007739
VOGUE SALON, () ly . AO a
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT.
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
(“Department”), files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Cosmetology, against
VOGUE SALON (“Respondent”), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of cosmetology
pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statute, and Chapters 455 and 477, Florida Statutes, and the
rules promulgated thereto.
2. At all times material hereto, Respondent was licensed as a Cosmetology
Establishment in the State of Florida, having been issued license CE 81095.
3. Respondent's address of record is 2811 Penn Avenue, Marianna, Florida 32448.
4. On or about February 10, 2006, Petitioner’s inspector, Jami McClellan, conducted
an inspection of Respondent salon.
5. During the inspection, Petitioner’s inspector observed that Respondent salon was
open and conducting business.
6. During the inspection, Petitioner’s inspector observed that the Respondent salon
was operating with an expired license.
7. Section 477.0265(1)(b)(1), Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part that “it is
unlawful for any person to own, operate, maintain, open, establish, conduct, or have charge of,
either alone or with another person or persons, a cosmetology salon which is not licensed under
the provisions of this chapter.”
8. During the inspection, Petitioner's inspector observed that the Respondent salon’s
license was not properly displayed at the front of the salon.
9. Rule 61G5-20.004(1)(a), Florida Administrative Code, states in pertinent part that. |
“all holders of a cosmetology or specialty salon license shall display within their salons in a
conspicuous place which is clearly visible to the general public upon entering the salon the
following documents: the current salon license.”
10. During the inspection, Petitioner’s inspector observed that piles of hair had
accumulated on the floor of Respondent salon.
11. Rule 61G5-20.002(1)(c)(1), Florida Administrative Code, states in pertinent part
that “[hJair must not be allowed to accumulate on the floor of the salon. Hair must be deposited
in a closed container.”
12. During the inspection, Petitioner’s inspector observed that Respondent salon did
not have EPA approved tuberculocidal disinfectant in the salon.
13. Rule 61G5-20.002(2)(d), Florida Administrative Code, provides that each salon
“shall be equipped with and utilize wet sanitizers with hospital level disinfectant or EPA
approved disinfectant.”
14. During the inspection, Petitioner’s inspector observed that dirty hair cutting
implements were stored with clean hair cutting implements.
15, Rule 61G5-20.002(2)(e), Florida Administrative Code, states in pertinent part that
“lalfter cleaning and disinfecting, articles shall be stored in a clean, closed cabinet or container
until used. Undisinfected articles such as pens, pencils, money, paper, mail, etc., shall not be
kept in the same container or cabinet.”
16. Section 477.029(1)(i), Florida Statutes, provides that it is unlawful for any person
to “[v]iolate or refuse to comply with any provision of [Chapter 477] or Chapter 455 or a rule or
final order of the Board or the Department.”
COUNT ONE
17. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs one through sixteen (16) as
though fully set forth herein.
18. Section 477,0265(1)(b)(1), Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part that “‘it is
unlawful for any person to own, operate, maintain, open, establish, conduct, or have charge of,
either alone or with another person or persons, a cosmetology salon which is not licensed under
the provisions of this chapter.”
19, Based on the forgoing, Respondent violated Section 477.0265(1)(b)(1), Florida
Statutes, by operating a salon without a valid license, and is thereby subject to discipline
pursuant to Sections 477.029(1)(h) and (2), Florida Statutes.
COUNT TWO
20. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs one through sixteen (16) as
though fully set forth herein.
21. Section 477.029(1)(i), Florida Statutes, provides that it is unlawful for any person
to “[v]iolate or refuse to comply with any provision of [Chapter 477] or Chapter 455 or a rule or
final order of the Board or the Department.”
22, Based on the forgoing, Respondent violated Section 477.029(1)(i), Florida
Statutes, by not properly displaying a valid cosmetology license, and is thereby subject to
discipline pursuant to Sections 477.029(1)(h) and (2), Florida Statutes.
COUNT THREE
23. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs one through sixteen (16) as
though fully set forth herein.
24, Section 477.029(1)(i), Florida Statutes, provides that it is unlawful for any person
to “[v]iolate or refuse to comply with any provision of [Chapter 477] or Chapter 455 or a rule or
final order of the Board or the Department.”
25. Based on the forgoing, Respondent violated Section 477.029(1)(i), Florida
Statutes, by leaving piles of hair on the floor, not having an EPA approved tuberculocidal
disinfectant, and by mixing clean and dirty implements together, and is thereby subject to
discipline pursuant to Sections 477.029(1)(h) and (2), Florida Statutes.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board of Cosmetology enter a Final
Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: imposition of an administrative fine,
revocation or suspension of Respondent’s license, issuance of a reprimand, placement of the
Respondent on probation, restriction of Respondent’s practice, and or any other relief which the
Board deems appropriate.
jon
SIGNED this Cony acd hey , 2006.
ONY “-
a professional Regulati
F |
pepartment of Business TN os epK — fy» -
° nen Cbaeg 7 Lexrchyp
Charles F, Tunnicliff
os nwa ' Chief Professions Attorney
CLERK Seal soOw
sate B ke?
Attorney for Petitioner:
Charles F. Tunnicliff
Chief Professions Attomey
Office of the General Counsel
Department of Business and Professional Regulations
1940 North Monroe Street
Suite 42
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202
Phone: (850) 487-9656
Facsimile: (850) 414-6749
CFT/jjc
Case # 2006-007739
fe aFT 7-16-06
Docket for Case No: 06-003031
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Sep. 21, 2006 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Sep. 19, 2006 |
Joint Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Sep. 06, 2006 |
Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office.
|
Sep. 01, 2006 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Sep. 01, 2006 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for September 27, 2006; 10:00 a.m., Central Time; Marianna, FL).
|
Aug. 23, 2006 |
Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Aug. 18, 2006 |
Initial Order.
|
Aug. 18, 2006 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Aug. 18, 2006 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Aug. 18, 2006 |
Agency referral filed.
|