Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: INNOVATIVE NURSING, INC.
Judges: WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Altamonte Springs, Florida
Filed: Dec. 18, 2006
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, January 10, 2007.
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2024
& =
06 Le D
STATE OF FLORIDA OC 8 é
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION 1 PH
Appa Sh
STATE OF FLORIDA, ae OMINISEN Of
HE Ap RAT,
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ARINGS VE
ADMINISTRATION, a
Petitioner, : 0 ( A { 4 |
vs. ACHA No. 2006008270
INNOVATIVE NURSING, INC.,
Respondent. ,
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION (hereinafter “Agency”) by and through its undersigned counsel, and files
this “Administrative Complaint against the Respondent, INNOVATIVE NURSING, INC.,
(hereinafter “Respondent”), pursuant to sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes (2006),
and alleges as follows:
Oo NATURE OF THE ACTION
This is an action to impose an administrative fine in the amount of ONE THOUSAND
DOLLARS ($1,000.00) against a home health agency pursuant to Section 400.474(1), Florida
Statutes (2006), based upon one uncorrected class II violation cited at a Licensure survey
conducted on or about August 1, 2006, that was a uncorrected deficiency from a previous survey
performed on or about June 5 through June 7, 2006.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
LL This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter pursuant to Sections 120.569
and 120.57, Florida Statutes (2006).
2. The Agency has jurisdiction over: the Respondent pursuant to Chapter 400, Part
IV, Florida Statutes (2006), and Chapter 59A-8, Florida Administrative Code (2006).
3. Venue lies pursuant to Rule 28-106.207, Florida Administrative Code (2006).
PARTIES
4. Pursuant to Chapter 400, Part I, Florida Statutes (2006)', and Chapter 59A-8,
Florida Administrative Code (2006), the Agency is the regulatory authority responsible for the
licensure of home health agencies and the enforcement of all applicable federal and state statutes
and rules governing home health agencies.
5. At all times material, the Respondent was a home health agency located at 499 E.
Central Parkway, Suite 100, Altamonte Springs, FL 32701. At all times material, the
Respondent was licensed by the Agency to operate a home health agency in Seminole County
having been issued license number 213030961 by the Agency.
6. At all times material, the Respondent is and was a licensed home health agency
required to comply with Chapter 400, Part II, Florida Statutes (2006), and Chapter 59A-8,
Florida Administrative Code (2006).
COUNT I
THE RESPONDENT FAILED TO ACCURATELY ASSESS AND PLAN THE
NEEDS FOR 2 OUT OF 8 SAMPLED PATIENTS. .
RULE 594A-8.0095(3)(a), Florida Administrative Code (2006)
UNCORRECTED CLASS Tif DEFICENCY
7. The Agency re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 7.
' Prior to July 1, 2006, Chapter 400, Part TI, Florida Statutes, had been numbered Chapter 400, Part IV, Florida
Statutes.
_8 ‘The regulatory provision of the Florida Administrative Code. that is specifically
pertinent here includes the following:
Rule 58A-8.0095, Florida Administrative Code
59A-8.0095 Personnel
(3) Registered Nurse.
(a) A registered nurse shall be currently licensed in the state, pursuant to Chapter 464, F.S.,
1. Be the case manager in all cases involving nursing or both nursing and therapy care.
2. Be responsible for the clinical record for each patient receiving nursing care; and
3. Assure that progress reports aré made to the physician for patients receiving nursing services
when the patient’s condition changes or there are deviations from the plan of care.’
9. On or about June 7, 2006, AH'CA. surveyors conducted a Licensure survey
of the Respondent’s facility that resulted in a Class III deficiency. The standard that the
Respondent shall accurately assess and plan the needs for residents-is not met based on
record review and interview, the home health agency failed to accurately assess and plan
for the needs for 2 of 10 sampled patients (#7 & #9).
The findings include:
Review of the clinical record for patient #7 revealed a plan of care dated 5/31/03
and updated 5/13/06. This plan of care indicated that s/ne was wheelchair-bound
with significant neurological deficits. The most recent on site nursing assessment,
dated 4/4/06, revealed a checked box that indicated that there were “no problems”
regarding the patient’s “functional deficits.”
Review of the clinical record for patient #9 revealed a plan of care dated 5/22/06.
This plan of care included a checked box that indicated the patient's “activities
permitted” included “up as tolerated.” The box under this category that included —
“wheelchair” was not checked. The nursing assessment dated 5/22/06 Indicated
_ that the patient was wheelchair-bound with no weight-bearing activities permitted.
In an interview with the administrator on 6/7/06 at 1 p.m., these fi findings were
confirmed.
10. The Respondent was provided a mandated correction date of June 27, 2006, for this
Class I violation.
11.’ AHCA surveyors conducted, another survey of the Respondent’s facility on or about
August 1, 2006. The standard that the Respondent shall accurately assess and plan the needs for
the residents were again not met based on record review and interview, the home health agency
failed to accurately assess and plan for the needs for 2 of 8 sampled patients (#4 & #5)
Findings include: .
Review of the clinical record for Patient #4 revealed a plan of care dated 6/19/06.
The only diagnoses’ noted on the plan of treatment or nursing assessment were
Bacteremia and Diabetes Mellitus without complications. This plan of care indicated
that. wound care-would be provided in the following manner: wet-to-dry daily
dressing change (wound location not specified) and IV (intravenous) infusion of
Ancef 2 grams (antibiotic) every -8 hours ‘with a plan to instruct a caregiver
regarding antibiotic infusions. There was no evidence found in the clinical record of
a change in the plan of care from 6/19/06-7/10/06.
Review of the skilled nursing visit notes revealed the following:
On 6/29/06, two skilled nurse visit notes by two different nurses were revealed that
indicated a wet-to-dry dressing. change for an abdominal wound. A notation was
made on both notes that indicated that family stated the IV antibiotic infusion was
“going well.”
On 7/10/06,. a skilled nurse visit noted that there was.no skin impairment. The
nurse also noted that Rocephin 1 gram daily/every 8 hours was given.
On 7/15/06, a visit note indicated that the nurse administered “medication with
SASH.” The nurse also noted that the patient “went to Shands to see about liver
transplant....right now on hold.” There was no prior nursing assessment that
revealed significant liver impairment. .
Review of the clinical record for patient #5, with a diagnosis of an exacerbation of
multiple sclerosis, revealed a comprehensive adult nursing assessment dated
7/21/06. This nursing assessment revealed checked boxes that indicated that the
patient had’ “No Problem” with pain, “No Problem” with the
neuron/emotional/behavior status, and “No Problem” with the musculoskeletal!
system, including “able to independently walk on even and uneven surfaces and
climb stairs with or without, raflings(no human assistance or assistive devices).
However, the Activities Permitted: section indicated the use of a cane.
The physician ordering the. IV Solumedrol treatment noted that the patient had
ataxic gait, head pain, increased sensory symptoms and bilateral extremity pain.
The medication list included Gabapentin, a medication used to control abnormal
neurological activity.
In an interview with the administrator on 8/1/06 at 3:00 p.m., these findings were
confirmed.
12. The Respondent was provided a mandated correction: date. of August 23, 2006 for
this Class II violation.
13. The foregoing violation is cited as a Class II deficiency pursuant to Rule 59A-
8.0095(3)(a), Florida Administrative Code, which requires the. Respondent shall accurately
assess and plan the needs for residents.
14. Such violations constitute the grounds for the imposed Class III deficiency in that it
has an indirect adverse effect on the health, safety or security of the facility’s residents, other
than Class I or Class II violations.
15. Pursuant to Section 400.484(c), Florida Statutes, Class I violations are subject to
an administrative fine of not to. exceed $500.00 for each occurrence and each day that the
‘uncorrected or repeat deficiency exists, Therefore, the Agency is authorized to impose a fine in
the amount of ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,000.00) for Count I.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, AHCA demands the following relief:
1. Enter factual and legal findings as set forth in the allegations of Count I;
. 2. Impose a fine in the amount of $1,000.00 for the referenced violations:
3. Enter other legal or equitable relief as this Court may find appropriate.
_ Respectfully submitted on this oh 1 day of 0 ct 2006.
Eric R. Bredemeyer, exidr ‘Attormey
Florida Bar No. 318442
Agency for Health Care Administration
Office of the General Counsel
Fort Myers Office
2295 Victoria Avenue, #346C
. Fort Myers, Florida 33901-3884
Telephone: (239) 338-3203
Facsimile: (239) 338-2699
NOTICE
THE RESPONDENT IS NOTIFIED THAT IT HAS THE RIGHT TO REQUEST AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING. PURSUANT TO SECTION 120.569 AND 120.57,
FLORIDA STATUTES. SPECIFIC OPTIONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION ARE
SET OUT IN THE ATTACHED ELECTION OF RIGHTS FORM.
THE RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED If THE ELECTION OF RIGHTS FORM
IS NOT RECEIVED BY THE AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF THE RECEIPT OF THIS ADMINISTRATIVE
COMPLAINT, A FINAL ORDER WILL BE ENTERED.
THE ELECTION OF RIGHTS FORM SHALL BE MADE TO THE AGENCY FOR
HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND DELIVERED TO: AGENCY CLERK,
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, 2727 MAHAN DRIVE, BLDG 3,
MAIL STOP 3, TALLAHASSEE, FL 32308; TELEPHONE (850) 922-5873.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the original Administrative Complaint and Election of Rights
form has been served to: Administrator, Innovative Nursing, Inc; 499 East Central Parkway
#100, Altamonte Springs, FL 32701, by U.S. Certified Mail, Retum Receipt Requested (No.
7006 0810 0005 8953 0242), and that a true and correct copy has been served to: Ivan M.
Lefkowitz ; Registered Agent, 430 N. Mills Avenue, Orlando, FL 32803, by U.S. Certified Mail,
Retum Receipt Requested (No. 7006 0810 0005 8953 0259), on this S247 day of
O ebro, 2006.
Florida Bar No. 31844
Agency for Health Care Administration
Office of the General Counsel, Fort Myers Office
2295 Victoria Avenue, #346C
Fort Myers, FL 33901-3884
Telephone: (239) 338-3203
Facsimile: (239) 338-2699
Copies furnished to:
Administrator
Innovative Nursing, Inc
499 East Central Parkway #100
Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701
(U.S. Certified Mail) .
Eric R. Bredemeyer, Senior Attorney
Agency for Health Care Administration
Office of the General Counsel, Fort Myers Office
2295 Victoria Avenue, #346C —
Fort Myers, FL 33901-3884
: Ciateroffice)
Ivan M. Lefkowitz :
Registered Agent
430 N. Mills Avenue
Orlando, FL 32803 ~
(U.S. Certified Mail)
Joel Libby
_ | Field Office Manager, Orlando Office
Agency for Health Care Administration
400 W. Robinson, Suite $390
Orlando, Fi 32801
‘acsimile
COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY
NDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
Complete items 1; 2;and 3: ‘Also’ ‘complete 22."
item 4 if. Restricted’ Delivary is: desired.
Print your:nameé and: address on'the reverse
so that wa: can ‘return ‘the: card to you,
Attach ‘this card to the back of the mallpiece,
or on the front if ‘space: permits.
Article Addressed to:"
ANMASISCA OE
Mola oe WOSSING, Inc!
49 East Cen\tol Ras Luana! bo
ernonte Sar nas, Florida
: D. Js delivery addiess different from item 171 Yes
°.. IEYES, enter delivery address below: Tino’
9. Service Type | :
O Certified Mal = Express Mall
3a To) O Reg!sterad G3 Return Recelpt for Merchandise
CO Insured Mall Ocop —
; 4, Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) O ves
Article Number : .
(Transtér from service labia) 7008 0410 ogas 8453 Dee
3 Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Recelpt 102595-02-M-1540 :
: CERTIFIED MAIL oon
(pomestic Mail. Only; No Insurance Coverage Provicted)
Postaga
Cartifisd Fee
Postmart
jatum Flecalpt Fe
(enderoomant Hequired} Here 0
ws
{Endorsement Required)
‘Tatal Postage & Feas
|
|
Restricted Delivery Fag
}
J
J
|
|
SantTa —
BAK Shwe hor Tnneive (lS.
’ | Siraai, Apt Na;
ceeonr ABest Condoos Rackwsysh 100.
( Bras} EL 3070
DIVISION of
ADNINISTR AY
HSA ve
Docket for Case No: 06-005151