Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE
Respondent: NORMAN SCHATZ, M.D.
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: May 02, 2007
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, June 11, 2007.
Latest Update: Dec. 24, 2024
May 2 200° 12:17
May 2 2007 12:17 P. 06
~ ~/
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
PETITIONER,
v. CASE NO. 2005-66621
NORMAN SCHATZ, M.D.,
RESPONDENT,
7
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its
NGI
undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint: before the
Board of Medicine against Respondent, Norman Schatz, M.D., and in
support thereof alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state department charged with regulating the
practice of medicine pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida Statutes; Chapter
456, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 458, Florida Statutes.
2, At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent was 4
licensed physician within the State of Florida, having been issued license
number ME 41735.
May 2 200° 12:17
May 2 2007 12:17 P.O?
uv /
3. Respondent's address of record is 801 Arthur Godfrey Road,
Suite 402, Miami, FL 33140. The Respondent is Board certified by the
American Board of Psychiatry & Neurology.
4. On or about June 3, 2002, Patient H.R. presented to
Respondent complaining of blurring and clouding in his left eye.
5. On or about June 3, 2002, Respondent allegedly diagnosed
Patient H.F. with Ischemic Optic Neuropathy. Respondent's handwritten
notes regarding his examination of Patient H.F. is left blank in the field
denoting “diagnostic considerations.”
6. Respondent's June 3, 2002, diagnosis, examination | and
treatment plan subsequently became involved as part of a medical
malpractice claim.
7. Onor about January 5, 2005, Respondent was deposed as part
of the medical malpractice claim. At this deposition, Respondent
referenced and provided handwritten notes regarding his examination of
June 3, 2002, that added “Amiodorone optic neuropathy” in the field
denoting “diagnostic considerations.”
8. On or about January 5, 2005, Respondent stated that this
notation was placed “The day of his visit.” Upon being questioned as to
2
J;\PSU\Medical\WARREN PEARSON\AC's\Schata(h)(k)(mn.doc
May 2 200° 12:18
May 2 2007 12:17 P. 08
why the records he referenced during the deposition did not match the
allegedly identical records provided as part of an earlier subpoena request,
Respondent changed his answer to “I have no idea when that was put in
that note.” In response to a followup question regarding the timing of the
“amiodorone optic neuropathy,” Respondent stated, *Not only don’t I know,
but I don’t really care.”
COUNT ONE
9. Petitioner realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1)
through eight (8), as if fully set forth herein this Count One.
10. Respondent made a _ deceptive, untrue _ oF fraudulent
representation in or related to the practice of medicine or employed a trick
or scheme in the practice of medicine when he altered medical records to
reflect a notation of “Amiodorone optic neuropathy” when his
examinations, diagnosis and medical plan was called into question as part
of a medical malpractice claim. Respondent similarly made a deceptive,
untrue or fraudulent representation in or related to the practice of medicine
or scheme in the practice of medicine when he alleged that this notation
was made June 3, 2002.
J:\PSU\Medical\WARREN PEARSON\AC's\Schatz(h)(k)(m.doc
May 2 200P 12:18
pan May 2 2007 12:18 P.09
ew’ ‘al
41. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section
458,331(1)(k), Florida Statutes (2004), by making deceptive, untrue, or
fraudulent representations in or related to the practice of medicine or
employing a trick or scheme in the practice of medicine.
COUNT TWO
12. Petitioner realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1)
- through eight (8), as if fully set forth herein this Count Two.
13. Respondent failed to keep medical records that justify the course of
treatment of the patients when he failed to note his alleged consideration of
Amiodarone optic neuropathy. _
14. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2001), by failing to keep legible, as
defined by department rule in consultation with the board, medical records
that identify the licensed physician or the physician extender and
supervising physician by name and professional title who is or are
responsible for rendering, ordering, supervising, or billing for each
diagnostic or treatment procedure and that justify the course of treatment
of the patient, including, but not limited to, patient histories; examination
J:\PSU\Medical\WARREN PEARSON\AC's\Schatz(h)(k)(m.daoc
May 2 200° 12:18
May 2 2007 12:18 P.10
results; test results; records of drugs prescribed, dispensed, or
administered; and reports of consultations and hospitalizations.
COUNT THREE
15. Petitioner realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1)
through eight (8), as if fully set forth herein this Count Three.
46. Section 458.331(1)(nn), Florida Statutes (2004), provides that a
physician may be subject to discipline by the Board of Medicine for
violating any provision of Chapter 458, or Chapter 456, or any rules
adopted pursuant thereto.
17. Rule 64B8-9.003, Florida Administrative Code, states in
pertinent part:
(4) All entries made into the medical records shall be
accurately dated and timed. Late entries are permitted, but
must be clearly and accurately noted as late entries and dated
and timed accurately when they are entered into the record.
However, office records do not need to be timed, just dated.
18. Respondent failed to comply with Rule 64B8-9.003(4) Florida
Administrative Code, when he failed to note the timing of his late entry of
“Amiodorone optic neuropathy.”
19. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section
458.331(1)(nn), Florida Statutes (2004), by failing to accurately record the
5
3:\PSU\Medical\ WARREN PEARSON\AC’s\Schata(h)(k){m.doc
May 2 200P 12:18
May 2 2007 12:18 P.11
Ne ‘ned
timing of the entry of “Amiodorone optic neuropathy”, in violation of Rule
64B8-9,003(4), Florida Administrative Code.
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of
Medicine enter an order imposing one of more of the following penalties:
permanent revocation or suspension of Respondent's license, restriction of
practice, imposition of an administrative fine, issuance of a reprimand,
placement of the Respondent on probation, corrective action, refund of
fees billed or collected, remedial education and/or any other relief that the
Board deems appropriate.
, 2006.
M, Rony Frangois, M.D., M.S.P.H., Ph.D
Secretary, Department of Health
PUT ee
pate_OVOIt Warren James Pearson
Assistant General Counsel
Florida Bar. No, 0711578
4052 Bald Cypress Way-Bin C-65
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3265
(850) 245-4640 ext 8141
(850) 245-4681 FAX
WIP/jbb
PCP: September. 3.4, deol
PCP Members: -Badae’, Davies
J:\PSU\Medical\WARREN PEARSON\AC's\Schatz(h)(k)(m.dac
May 2 200? 12:19
May 2 2007 12:18 P.12
Nana ‘wal
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Respondent has the right to request a hearing to be
conducted in accordance with Section 120.569 and 120.57,
Florida Statutes, to be represented by counsel or other qualified
representative, to present evidence and argument, to call and
cross-examine witnesses and to have subpoena and subpoena
duces tecum issued on his or her behalf if a hearing is requested.
NOTICE REGARDING ASSESSMENT OF COSTS
Respondent is placed on notice that Petitioner has incurred
costs related to the investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Pursuant to Section 456.072(4), Florida Statutes, the Board shall
assess costs related to the investigation and prosecution of a
disciplinary matter, which may include attorney hours and costs,
on the Respondent in addition to any other discipline imposed.
3:\P5U\Medical\WARREN PEARSON\AC's\Schatz(h)(kXm.doc
Docket for Case No: 07-001916PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Jun. 11, 2007 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Jun. 07, 2007 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
May 31, 2007 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (2) filed.
|
May 29, 2007 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (1) filed.
|
May 23, 2007 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (5) filed.
|
May 16, 2007 |
Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition Duces Tecum filed.
|
May 16, 2007 |
Notice of Issuance of Subpoenas filed.
|
May 14, 2007 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
May 14, 2007 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for July 27, 2007; 9:30 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
|
May 11, 2007 |
Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition Duces Tecum (of M. Kay,M.D.) filed.
|
May 11, 2007 |
Notice of Unavailability filed.
|
May 11, 2007 |
Notice of Taking Deposition (of J. Glaser) filed.
|
May 11, 2007 |
Notice of Taking Deposition (of P. Bowen) filed.
|
May 11, 2007 |
Notice of Issuance of Subpoenas filed.
|
May 09, 2007 |
Notice of Taking Deposition (of N. Schatz, M.D.) filed.
|
May 09, 2007 |
Notice of Taking Deposition (of B. Lemoine) filed.
|
May 09, 2007 |
Amended Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
May 09, 2007 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
May 07, 2007 |
Respondent`s Supplement to Election of Rights filed.
|
May 02, 2007 |
Initial Order.
|
May 02, 2007 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
May 02, 2007 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
May 02, 2007 |
Notice of Appearance (filed by W. Pearson).
|
May 02, 2007 |
Agency referral filed.
|