Filed: Sep. 18, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 No. 07-10519 THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 06-00249-CV-FTM-29-SPC ANNA L. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THE FLORIDA BAR, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 18, 2007) Before BIRCH, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Anna L. Brown appeals the district
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 18, 2007 No. 07-10519 THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 06-00249-CV-FTM-29-SPC ANNA L. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THE FLORIDA BAR, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 18, 2007) Before BIRCH, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Anna L. Brown appeals the district ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPTEMBER 18, 2007
No. 07-10519 THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________ CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 06-00249-CV-FTM-29-SPC
ANNA L. BROWN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
THE FLORIDA BAR,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(September 18, 2007)
Before BIRCH, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Anna L. Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint
against the Florida Bar. The district court found that the Florida Bar was entitled
to sovereign immunity under Eleventh Amendment, or in the alternative, absolute
immunity, and was therefore immune from suit. Brown acknowledges that in
Kaimowitz v. The Florida Bar,
996 F.2d 1151 (11th Cir. 1993), we held that “the
Eleventh Amendment prohibits actions against . . . state bars.”
Kaimowitz, 996
U.S. at 1155. Under the prior precedent rule, Kaimowitz bars Brown’s claim.
AFFIRMED.
2