Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: JOHN ALAN OSTENDORF
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Lauderdale Lakes, Florida
Filed: Oct. 27, 2008
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, February 23, 2009.
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2024
é a
STATE OF FLORIDA iy S&P
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION “*’ (>, ks
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
DIVISION I
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND p
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, 0 y SY) CL .
Petitioner,
v. Case Nos. 2006-061583
2007-029287
2007-041134
2007-055574
2007-057357
JOHN ALAN OSTENDORF,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, Department of Business and Professional
Regulation, ("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint |
before the Construction Industry Licensing Board, against JOHN
ALAN OSTENDORF ("Respondent"), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating
the practice of contracting pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida
Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent is and has been, at all times material
hereto, a Certified Building Contractor in the State of Florida,
having been issued license number CBC1251699.
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061533.Ostendorf. AC.doc 1
3. Respondent's address of record is 125 North Congress
Avenue, Unit 17, Delray Beach, Florida 33445.
4. At all times material hereto, Respondent was licensed
as the qualifying agent for ‘Home Team Advantage, Inc.
(hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"), a Florida corporation
with qualified business organization certificate of authority
number QB29759.
5. Section 489.1195(1) (a), Florida Statutes, provides
that all primary qualifying agents for a business organization
are jointly and equally responsible for supervision of all
operations of the business organization; for all field work at
all sites; and for financial matters, both for the organization
in general and for each specific job.
Case No. 2006-061583
6. On or about November 21, 2005 the Contractor entered
into a contract with Bryon Halsey (hereinafter referred to as
“Halsey”) to perform hurricane damage repair work on Halsey’s
residence located at 1115 N.W. 7th Avenue, Ft. Lauderdale,
Florida.
7. The contract price was $36,350.00.
8. On or about January 12, 2006 Halsey paid the
Contractor $4,000.00 toward the contract price.
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc : 2
9. The Contractor failed to apply for a building permit
for the project and failed to commence the project.
10. On or about August 3, 2006 the Contractor entered into
a written contract with Halsey to perform kitchen remodeling,
master bathroom remodeling, and window and door installations at
Halsey’s residence, for the price of $33,600.14.
11. Per the August 3, 2006 contract, on or about May 19,
2006 and August 9, 2006, Halsey made payments to the Contractor
toward the contract price totaling $10,000.00.
12. The August 3, 2006 contract provided that Halsey was
responsible for obtaining a building permit for the kitchen
remodeling work and that the Contractor was responsible for
obtaining a building permit for the master bathroom remodeling
work.
13. No building permit was applied for or obtained for any
of the work called for by the August 3, 2006 contract.
14. During the period from about August to September 2006,
the Contractor performed some kitchen remodeling work.
15. Dissatisfied with the speed and quality of the
Contractor’s work, on or about September 28, 2006, Halsey
terminated the August 3, 2006 contract.
16. The Contractor agreed initially to refund some unused
portion of Halsey’s payments, but subsequently the Contractor
G:Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc 3
failed or refused to do so, despite having spent only $5,690.51
on material and labor.
COUNT ONE
17. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through sixteen as though fully set
forth in this Count One.
18. Section 489.126(2) (a), Florida Statutes, states: “A
contractor who receives, as initial payment, money totaling more
than 10 percent of the contract price for repair, restoration,
improvement, or construction to residential real property must
apply for permits necessary to do work within 30 days after the
date payment is made, except where the work does not require a
. permit under the applicable codes and ordinances.”
19. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1)(i), Florida Statutes, by failing in any
material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT TWO
20. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through sixteen as though fully set
forth in this Count Two.
21. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (4), Florida Statutes, by abandoning a
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc 4
see
coed
construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned
after 90 days if the contractor terminates the project without
just cause or without proper notification to the owner,
including the reason for termination, or fails to perform work
without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
COUNT THREE
22. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through sixteen as though fully set
forth in this Count Three.
23. Based upon ‘the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (m), Florida Statutes, by committing
incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting, by
failing to return any money to Halsey.
COUNT FOUR
24. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through sixteen as though fully set
forth in this Count Four.
25. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (0), Florida Statutes, by proceeding on any
job without obtaining applicable local building department
permits and inspections, by starting work on the project in this
case without a building permit.
. G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc 5
Ses
se
Case No. 2007-029287
26. On or about March 25, 2006, the Contractor entered
into a written contract with Cassandra Ferguson (hereinafter
referred to as “Ferguson”) to remodel and renovate Ferguson's
residence located at 2180 N.W. 3rd Street, Pompano Beach,
Florida a/k/a 2260 N.W. 3rd Street, Pompano Beach, Florida.
27. The contract price was $80,000.00.
28. On or about March 18, 2006 and March 25, 2006,
Ferguson made payments’ to the Contractor pursuant to the
contract totaling $16,000.00.
29. On or about May 15, 2006, the Contractor applied to
the City of Pompano Beach building department for a building
permit for partial interior demolition work. The application
was approved, and on or about May 15, 2006, building permit
number 06-6644 was issued. Work pursuant to that building
permit was performed by members of Ferguson’s family.
30. On or about April 25, 2007 the Contractor applied to
the City of Pompano Beach building department for a building
permit for the project. On or about May 9, 2007 the building
department mechanical division rejected the plans with the
comment, “provide 2 sets of mechanical plans showing total scope
of work.” On or about July 13, 2007 the building department
building division rejected the plans with the comment, “will
G:ATed 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc 6
ae
sees”
need more information from architect...” On or about July 16,
2007 the building department plumbing division rejected the
plans with the comment, “rejected need to state on plans or
appl. if fixtures are to be removed and replaced same location
or if any fixtures will be relocated.”
31. On or about August 20, 2007 the Contractor picked up
the plans from the building department. Thereafter, the
Contractor did not resubmit the plans, no building permit was
issued to the Contractor for the project, and without just cause
and notice to Ferguson the Contractor failed to commence the
project, thereby abandoning the project.
COUNT FIVE
32. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and twenty six through
thirty one as though fully set forth in this Count Five.
33. Section 489.126(2) (a), Florida Statutes, states: “A
contractor who receives, as initial payment, money totaling more
than 10 percent of the contract price for repair, restoration,
improvement, or construction to residential real property must
apply for permits necessary to do work within 30 days after the
date payment is made, except where the work does not require a
permit under the applicable codes and ordinances.”
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc 7
34. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1)(i), Florida Statutes, by failing in any
material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT SIX
35. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and twenty six through
thirty one as though fully set forth in this Count Six.
36. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (4), Florida Statutes, by abandoning a
construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned
after 90 days if the contractor terminates the project without
just cause or without proper notification to the owner,
including the reason for termination, or fails to perform work
without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
COUNT SEVEN
37. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and twenty six through
thirty one as though fully set forth in this Count Seven.
38. The Contractor committed misconduct in the practice of
contracting by failing to expeditiously apply for and obtain a
building permit for the project in this case.
G:ATed 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc 8g
39. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (m), Florida Statutes, by committing
incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting.
Case No. 2007-041134
40. On or about October 10, 2005 the Contractor entered
into a written contract with Kenneth and Kaarina Altman
(hereinafter referred to as the “Altmans”) to construct an
addition and enclose a patio at the Altmans’ residence located
at 12420 S.W. 7 Place, Davie, Florida.
41. The contract price was $87,500.00.
42, On or about September 28, 2005 and October 11, 2005
the Altmans made payments to the Contractor pursuant to the
contract totaling $25,000.00.
43. On or about June 27, 2006 the Contractor applied to
the Town of Davie building department for a building permit for
the project, but the application was not approved, and the
Contractor did not obtain a building permit.
44, The Contractor did not commence construction, and on
or about January 29, 2007 the Altmans terminated the contract,
citing the Contractor’s non-performance.
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc 9
COUNT EIGHT
45. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and forty through forty
four as though fully set forth in this Count Eight.
46. Section 489.126(2) (a), Florida Statutes, states: “A
contractor who receives, as initial payment, money totaling more
than 10 percent of the contract price for repair, restoration,
improvement, or construction to residential real property must
apply for permits necessary to do work within 30 days after the
date payment is made, except where the work does not require a
permit under the applicable codes and ordinances.”
47. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (i), Florida Statutes,. by failing in any
material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT NINE
48. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and forty through forty
four as though fully set forth in this Count Nine.
49, The Contractor committed misconduct in the practice of
contracting by failing to expeditiously apply for and obtain a
building permit for the project in this case.
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc 10
50. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (m), Florida Statutes, by committing
incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting.
Case No. 2007-055574
51. On or about September 14, 2005 the Contractor entered
into. a written contract with Franklyn and Marilyn Watts
(hereinafter referred to as the “Watts”) for the construction of
a master bathroom addition to the Watts’ residence located at
4940 S.W. 126° Avenue, Southwest Ranches, Florida.
52. The contract price was $40,000.00.
53. On or about September 6 and 14, 2005 the Watts made
payments to the Contractor pursuant to the contract totaling
$9,000.00.
54. On or about March 1, 2006 the Contractor applied to
the Town of Southwest Ranches building department for a building
permit for the project, but the application was not approved.
55. The Contractor failed to expeditiously apply for and
obtain a building permit for the project and did not commence
construction. On or about April 2007 the Watts terminated the
contract.
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc i
sete
dl
COUNT TEN
56. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and fifty one through
fifty five as though fully set forth in this Count Ten.
57. Section 489.126(2) (a), Florida Statutes, states: “A
contractor who receives, as initial payment, money totaling more
than 10 percent of the contract price for repair, restoration,
improvement, or construction to residential real property must
apply for permits necessary to do work within 30 days after the
date payment is made, except where the work does not require a
permit under the applicable codes and ordinances.”
58. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (i), Florida Statutes, by failing in any
material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT ELEVEN
59. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and fifty one through
fifty five as though fully set forth in this Count Eleven.
60. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent’ violated
Section 489.129(1) (m), Florida Statutes, by committing
incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting.
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc 2
swage
Case No. 2007-057357
61. On or about May 4, 2005 the Contractor received
$6,000.00 from James Murphy (hereinafter referred to as
‘“Murphy”) as an initial deposit toward the proposed construction
of an addition to Murphy’s residence located at 1394 S.E. 22nd
Avenue, Pompano Beach, Florida.
62. On or about June 22, 2005 the Contractor offered to
Murphy a written contract proposal for the construction of a
two-car garage and bathroom addition to Murphy’s residence for
$60,000.00. The proposal called for Murphy to pay _ the
Contractor an additional $12,000.00 as a 20% “acceptance draw.”
63. At the time the offer, but unbeknownst to Murphy,
existing zoning restrictions substantially affected the
feasibility of the project. At or prior to the time.of the
offer, the Contractor failed to disclose the zoning restrictions
to Murphy, even though the Contractor knew or should have known
about them.
64. On or about June 22, 2005 Murphy accepted the
Contractor's proposal and paid the Contractor the $12,000.00
acceptance draw.
65. On or about November 29, 2005 the Contractor applied
to the City of Pompano Beach building department for a building
permit for the project. On or about December 2, 2005 the
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc 13
‘building department’s planning and zoning department rejected
the plans with the comment, “Addition violates the front setback
of 25’ plans shows addition is only 11’ feet from front property
line.” No building permit for the project was issued.
66. The Contractor proposed alternative construction
projects to Murphy. Murphy did not accept any of the proposals
and demanded that the Contractor return the monies that Murphy
had paid, but the Contractor failed or refused to do 80,
claiming, despite the zoning restrictions, to be “ready, willing
and able” to perform in accordance with the contract.
COUNT TWELVE
67. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and sixty one through
sixty six as though fully set forth in this Count Twelve.
68. Section 489.126(2) (a), Florida Statutes, states: “A
contractor who receives, as initial payment, money totaling more
than 10 percent of the contract price for repair, restoration,
improvement, or construction to residential real property must
apply for permits necessary to do work within 30 days after the
date payment is made, except where the work does not require a
permit under the applicable codes and ordinances.”
69. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (i), Florida Statutes, by failing in any
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc 14
material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT THIRTEEN
70. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and sixty one through
sixty six as though fully set forth in this Count Thirteen.
71. The Contractor committed misconduct in the practice of
contracting by any one or more of the following: (a) failing to
disclose the zoning restrictions to Murphy before entering into
the June 22, 2005 contract with Murphy; (b) failing to
expeditiously apply for a building permit for the project in
this case; and (c) failing to return any money to Murphy.
72. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (m), Florida Statutes, by committing
incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the
Construction Industry Licensing Board enter an Order imposing
one or more of the following penalties: place on probation,
reprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or
renewal of the certificate or registration, require financial
restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to
exceed $10,000 per violation, require continuing education,
assess costs associated with investigation and prosecution,
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC. doc 1s
impose any or all penalties delineated within Section
455.227(2), Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the
Board is authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 489, 455,
Florida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder.
th
Signed this 2 day of A , 2008.
PC Found: August 26, 2008 / i he... Gng
Div. I: Bonuso & Thornton
Theodore R. Gay
Assistant General Counsel
Florida Bar No. 242896
Department of Business and
t 1) es Professional Regulation
\ \L essen ® Office of the General Counsel
areas ane Ph ERK 8240 NW 52™ Terrace, Suite 304
gust cx cu : . :
porn Miami, Florida 33166
(305) 470-6783 ext. 2225 Telephone
wees (305) 470-5781 Facsimile
t\?
ww 2.08
grt 22
ef
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\06-061583.Ostendorf. AC.doc 16
Docket for Case No: 08-005401PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Feb. 23, 2009 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Feb. 23, 2009 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Cancel Hearing and to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Feb. 18, 2009 |
Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s Amended Motion to Withdraw filed.
|
Feb. 17, 2009 |
Amended Motion to Withdraw filed.
|
Feb. 17, 2009 |
Motion to Withdraw filed.
|
Feb. 17, 2009 |
Petitioner`s Notice of Filing Exhibits and Exhibit List (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
|
Feb. 16, 2009 |
Petitioner`s Witness List filed.
|
Feb. 16, 2009 |
Petitioner`s Notice of Filing Exhibits and Exhibit List (exhibits not attached) filed.
|
Jan. 13, 2009 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for February 23 and March 6, March 6 and 10 through 13, 2009; 9:30 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Jan. 09, 2009 |
Motion to Continue filed.
|
Jan. 09, 2009 |
Notice of Appearance (filed by D. Perera).
|
Dec. 01, 2008 |
Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions filed.
|
Nov. 05, 2008 |
Order Directing Filing of Exhibits.
|
Nov. 05, 2008 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Nov. 05, 2008 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for January 20 through 23, 29, and 30, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Nov. 03, 2008 |
Petitioner`s Amended Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Nov. 03, 2008 |
Petitioner`s Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Oct. 27, 2008 |
Initial Order.
|
Oct. 27, 2008 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Oct. 27, 2008 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Oct. 27, 2008 |
Agency referral filed.
|