Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: TOWN AND COUNTRY HOSPITAL, L.P., D/B/A TOWN AND COUNTRY HOSPITAL
Judges: CAROLYN S. HOLIFIELD
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Jan. 08, 2009
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, February 4, 2009.
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
04-0102
STATE OF FLORIDA,
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner,
vs. Case No. 2008012658
TOWN & COUNTRY HOSPITAL, LP,
d/b/a TOWN & COUNTRY HOSPITAL,
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Agency For Health Care Administration (hereinafter Agency), by and
through the undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint against TOWN &
COUNTRY HOSPITAL, LP, d/b/a TOWN & COUNTRY HOSPITAL (hereinafter Respondent),
pursuant to Section 120.569, and 120.57, Florida Statutes, (2008), and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
This is an action to impose administrative fines in the amount of one thousand dollars
($1,000.00) pursuant to Sections 120.569, 120.57, 395.1055 and 395.1065, Fla. Stat. (2008).
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. The Agency has jurisdiction pursuant to Chapters 395, Part I, and 408, Part II, Fla. Stat.
(2008).
2. Venue lies pursuant to Section 120.57 Florida Statutes, and Chapter 28-106.207 Florida
Administrative Code.
PARTIES
3. The Agency is the regulatory authority with regard to hospital licensing and regulation
pursuant to Chapters 395, Part I, and 408, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 59A-3, Florida
Administrative Code, respectively.
4. Respondent is a hospital located at 6001 Webb Road, Tampa, Florida 33615, and is
licensed under Chapter 395, Part I, Florida Statutes and Chapter 59A-3, Florida Administrative
Code, license number 4043.
5. Respondent was at all times material hereto a licensed facility under the licensing
authority of the Agency, and was required to comply with all applicable tules, and statutes.
COUNT I
6. The Agency re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs (1) through (5) as if fully set forth
herein.
7. That pursuant to Florida law, every hospital offering emergency services and care shall
provide emergency care available 24 hours a day within the hospital to patients presenting to the
hospital. At a minimum 1. Emergency services personnel shall be available to ensure that
emergency services and care are provided in accordance with Section 395.002(10)[sic], F.S.; 2.
At least one physician shall be available within 30 minutes through a medical staff call roster;
initial consultation through two-way voice communication is acceptable for physician presence;
3. specialty consultation shall be available by request of the attending physician or by transfer to
a designated hospital where definitive care can be provided. Rule 59A-3.255(6){a), Florida
Administrative Code.
8. That pursuant to Florida law, "Emergency services and care" means medical screening,
examination, and evaluation by a physician, or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, by
other appropriate personnel under the supervision of a physician, to determine if an emergency
medical condition exists and, if it does, the care, treatment, or surgery by a physician necessary
to relieve or eliminate the emergency medical condition, within the service capability of the
facility. Section 395.002(9), Florida Statutes (2008).
9. That on October 9, 2008, the Petitioner Agency conducted a complaint survey, complaint
number 2008011288 of the Respondent facility.
10. That based upon the review of records and interview, Respondent failed to ensure that
specialty consultations within the service capability of the Respondent were utilized to treat a
patient's emergency medical conditions, prior to transferring a patient, the same being contrary to
law.
11. That Petitioner’s representative reviewed Respondent’s records relating to patient number
one (1) during the survey and noted as follows:
a. The patient is a non-insured young individual that presented to the emergency
room, (ER), with a gunshot to left arm;
b. Emergency room records contained a physician's note dated September 23, 2008
at 7:32 PM which reads "Wound was irrigated with normal saline and a pressure
dressing, in addition to a splint was applied. Spoke with [named physician], T&C
orthopedics who felt that fracture could be seen as an outpatient. However, due to
pulsating artery seen in the laceration, I felt that patient needed to be evaluated
tonight by vascular surgery. Distal flow does not eliminate the possibility of
partial arterial tear. [named local hospital] accepted transfer.”
c. The patient’s medical record reflected that the orthopedics physician, after being
called by the emergency room physician, did not see the patient in the emergency
room, but instead stated that the orthopedic physician could see the patient as an
outpatient;
d. Absent from Respondent’s records was any indication that the vascular physician
on-call was either called or that the vascular consult directed by the emergency
room physician was requested by Respondent’s emergency room staff from staff
within its service capability prior to the patient’s transfer to another hospital for
possible vascular trauma.
12. _ That Petitioner’s representative reviewed Respondent’s Emergency Room On-Call
Schedule for September 2008 during the survey and noted that both an orthopedic and a vascular
physician was on call on the day of the emergency room treatment for patient number one (1),
September 23, 2008.
13. That Petitioner’s representative interviewed Respondent’s Chief Nursing Officer during
the survey who indicated as follows:
a. That the Chief Nursing Officer was on administrative call on September 23, 2008
and gave the emergency room administrative approval for the transfer of patient
number one (1);
b. That the Chief Nursing Officer could not remember if a vascular consult of
patient number one (1) was obtained by Respondent prior to the transfer of patient
number one (1);
c. That the Chief Nursing Officer had given approval for the transfer of patient
number one (1), but the same was based on information provided by emergency
room staff and not based upon a review of the patient’s chart.
14. _—_ That Petitioner’s representative interviewed Respondent’s Emergency Room Director
during the survey who indicated that the Director remembered the case of patient number one
(1), but could not recall if the vascular surgeon was called for a consultation.
15. That Petitioner’s representative interviewed Respondent’s Emergency Room Medical
Director during the survey who indicated that the Medical Director had spoken to the emergency
room physician after the transfer and was told that patient number one (1) was transferred
because of possible trauma to the radial artery.
16. That Petitioner’s representative reviewed Respondent’s policy and procedure named
“EMTALA-Transfer” and noted under procedure numbered three (3) “Each hospital must
transfer the patient if it has exhausted all its capabilities in trying to stabilize the patient's
emergency medical condition."
17. _ That the above reflects Respondent’s failure to provide emergency specialty consultation
within Respondent’s service capability prior to transfer of a patient, the same being contrary to
law.
18. That the failure to provide emergency specialty consultation within the Respondent’s
service capability places patients at risk of not receiving prompt emergency medical care and
services as defined by law and stabilization prior to transfer.
19. That these deficient practices do not ensure that patient goals are met.
20. That the Agency cited the Respondent facility for the above referenced deficiency.
21. That the above cited deficiency subjects the Respondent facility to the imposition of an
administrative penalty in a sum not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per violation per
day. § 395.1065 (2)(a) Fla. Stat. (2008).
WHEREFORE, the Agency intends to impose an administrative fine in the amount of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) against Respondent, a hospital in the State of Florida, pursuant to §
395.1065 (2)(a) Fla. Stat. (2006).
Respectfully submitted this“ day of December, 2008.
af a
Thomas J? Walsh I
Fla.Bar. No. 566365
Counsel for Petitioner
Agency for Health Care Administration
525 Mirror Lake Drive, 330G
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
727.552.1525 (office)
Respondent is notified that it has a right to request an administrative hearing pursuant to Section
120.569, Florida Statutes. Specific options for administrative action are set out in the attached
Election of Rights.
All requests for hearing shall be made to the Agency for Health Care Administration, and
delivered to Agency Clerk, Agency for Health Care Administration, 2727 Mahan Drive, Bldg
#3,MS #3, Tallahassee, FL 32308;Telephone (850) 922-5873.
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO REQUEST A HEARING
WITHIN 21 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT WILL RESULT IN AN
ADMISSION OF THE FACTS ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT AND THE ENTRY OF A
FINAL ORDER BY THE AGENCY.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been sgrved by
USS. Certified Mail, Return Receipt No. 7007 0220 0001 1589 3362 on December , 2008
to CT Corporation System, Registered Agent, 1200 South Pine Island Rd., Plantation, Florida
33324 and by U.S. Mail to Michael Landry, CEO, Town & Country Hospital, 6001 Webb Road,
Tampa, Florida 33615. A
/ /
3 J
as J. Walsh II, Esquire
f
Copies furnished to:
CT Corporation System Michael Landry, CEO
Registered Agent Town & Country Hospital
1200 S. Pine Island Rd. 6001 Webb Road
Plantation, FL 33324
(US. Certified Mail)
Tampa, Florida 33615
U.S. Mail
Patricia R. Caufman Thomas J. Walsh, I, Esquire
Field Office Manager Agency for Health Care Admin.
525 Mirror Lake Drive, 4" Floor 525 Mirror Lake Drive, 330G
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
Interoffice) (nteroffice)
,
SENDER: COMPLETA *
™ Complete items.1, 2, and o. iso complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
™ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
@ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
x ed
B. Received by ( Printed Name)
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? LI Yésh
IFYES, enter delivery address below: [1 No
ay,
oy
1. Article Addressed to:
CT Corporation System
Registered Agent’
1200 S. Pine Island Rd. 3. Service Type
Plantation, FL 33324 tified Mail C1 Express Mail
CRegistered St Return Recelpt for Merchandise
O insured Mail = C.0.D.
4, Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) O Yes
& 900? geen noon 159 ashe 7) ACOS OPC
——————— 2
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic. Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1540
Docket for Case No: 09-000103
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Feb. 04, 2009 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Jan. 21, 2009 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Jan. 21, 2009 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for March 24 and 25, 2009; 9:30 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
|
Jan. 14, 2009 |
Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Jan. 09, 2009 |
Initial Order.
|
Jan. 08, 2009 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jan. 08, 2009 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Jan. 08, 2009 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Jan. 08, 2009 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|
Jan. 29, 2008 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|