Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Respondent: THOMAS C. CHARPENTIER
Judges: P. MICHAEL RUFF
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Shalimar, Florida
Filed: Jan. 23, 2009
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, October 1, 2009.
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2025
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Petitioner,
v. : Case No. 2008-039474
THOMAS C. CHARPENTIER,
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
The Department of Business and Professional Regulation
(“Petitioner”) files this Administrative Complaint against
Thomas C. Charpentier (“Respondent”), and alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating
the provision of real estate appraisal services, pursuant to
Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 475,
Florida Statutes .
2. The Department of Business and Professional Regulation
has jurisdiction over thé unlicensed provision of real estate
appraisal services pursuant to Section 455.228, Florida
Statutes. ) .
3. Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, entitles Respondent to
elect a hearing regarding the allegations contained herein.
Rule 28-106.111, Florida Administrative Code, provides in part
that if Respondent fails to request a hearing within 21 days of
GAOGC ULA\AC 2008\Charpentior AC.1 doc 1
ST/SA Sad YOO sddd Bp29P Tress Se-TT 6hae/ee/Ta
Be:0T b6O0¢e te ver
receipt of an agency pleading, Respondent waives Respondent's
right to request a hearing on the facts alleged.
40° Respondent’s “last known address is 2706 Stormy Cirele,
Navarre, FL 32566.
5. At no time material to this complaint was Respondent
certified or licensed to provide real estate appraisal services
in the State of Florida pursuant to Chapter 475, Florida
Statutes.
6. Respondent was previously licensed as a Certified
General Appraiser in Louisiana. . Respondent’s Louisiana license
became inactive on March 4, 1991, and expired on December 31,
1994.
7. In or about February 2006, Respondent submitted an
application and request to the Florida Real Estate Appraiser
Board (the “Board”) for a waiver or variance of the Board's
rules pertaining to licensure and stated he sought to expedite
obtaining a certified general appraiser’s license in the State
of Florida. |
8. The Board denied Respondent’s request for 4 waiver or
variance on December 3, 2007.
9, During the course of the review and a subsequent
investigation of Respondent's application and request for
variance, the Department obtained documents and information as
set forth below.
GAOGC ULA\AC 2008\Charpenticr AC. 1.dac 2
ST/98 Sad YOO sddd Bp29P Tress Se-TT 6hae/ee/Ta
Be:0T b6O0¢e te ver
10. Respondent submitted two resumes to the. Department.
11. One of the resumes contained the following identifying
information: QUALIFICATIONS OF THE APPRAISER. APPRAISER: THOMAS
Cc. CHARPENTIER, Real Estate Appraiser - Vanguard Bank and Trust.
See Exhibit A.
12. A second resume contained the following identifying
information: QUALIFICATIONS OF THE APPRAISER. APPRAISER: THOMAS
C. CHARPENTIER, Manager, Senior Real Estate Appraiser—-Vanguard
Bank and Trust. See Exhibit 5.
13. Respondent’ s Vanguard Bank business card contained the
- following identifying information: “Thomas C. Charpentier, Real
Estate Appraiser, Appraisal Institute General Associate.” See
Exhibit C.
14. At all times material to this complaint Respondent has
been employed by Vanguard Bank and Trust (“the bank”) in Mary
Esther, Florida, in the “Appraisal Review” department.
15. Respondent created the “Appraisal Review” department
at the bank.
16, Respondent's duties at the bank include reviewing
appraisal. reports submitted to the bank by certified appraisers
to determine compliance with the Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice.
17. The Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice (“USPAP”) are the standards governing the preparation,
GAQGC ULA\AC 2008\Charpentier AC. 1.doc 3
ST/é@ Sod YOO sddd Bp29P Tress Se-TT 6hae/ee/Ta
B2:0T 600e fe Yer
reporting, and reviewing of appraisals established by the
Appraisal Foundation pursuant to the Financial Institutions
Reform,: Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989. The purpose of
USPAP is to ensure that an appraisal is objectively reliable and .
to prevent those who rely on the appraisal reports from being
misled.
18. Section 475.628, Florida Statutes, provides in
relevant part that each appraiser registered, licensed, or
certified in Florida shall comply with USPAP.
19. USPAP Standards. Rule 3 applies to appraisal review,
development and reporting, and requires the reviewer to prepare
a separate report setting forth the scope of work performed and
the results of the appraisal review.
20. USPAP Standards Rule 3-3 requires each written
appraisal review report to contain a signed certification that
is similar in content to the following form:
I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
- the facts and data reported by the reviewer
and used in the review process are true and
correct.
- the analyses, opinions, and conclusions in
this review report are limited only by the
assumptions and limiting conditions stated
in this review report and are my personal,
impartial, ~and unbiased professional
analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
- I have no (or the specified) present or
prospective interest in the property that is
GAGGC ULA\AC 2008\Charpentier AC. 1.doe 4
ST/8a Jad YOO sddd Bp29P Tress Se-TT 6hae/ee/Ta
Be:0T b6O0¢e te ver
21.
the subject of the work under review and no
(or the specified) personal interest with
respect to the parties involved.
“I have no bias with respect to the property
that is the subject of the work under review
or to the parties involved with this
assignment.
my engagement in this assignment was not
contingent upon developing or reporting
predetermined results.
my compensation is not contingent on an
action or event resulting from the analyses,
opinions, or conclusions in this review or
from its use.
my analyses, opinions, and conclusions were
developed and this review report was
prepared in conformity with the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice. ;
I have (or have not) made a personal
inspection of the subject property of the
work under review. (If more than one person
signs this certification, the certification
must clearly specify which individuals did
and which individuals did not make a
personal inspection of the subject property
of the work under review.)
no one provided significant appraisal,
appraisal review, or appraisal consulting
assistance to the person signing this
certification. (If there are exceptions, the
name of each individual (s) providing
appraisal, appraisal review, or appraisal
consulting assistance must be stated.)
on June 11, 2008, Respondent developed
and
communicated to Vanguard Bank a review report of an appraisal
GAOGC ULALAC 2008\Charpentier AC. 1.doc
ST/6A = Savd
YOO sddd Bp29P Tress
62:07 600¢ ge Yer
Sa:1T
babs /62 / TH
ST/aT
report
developed by State Certified General Real
Appraiser Michael L. Carroll. See Exhibit D.
22.
Estate
In His review report, Respondent evaluated Carroll’s
appraisal report for quality control and conformity with the
Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice {USPAP).
23.
Respondent's review report contained a certification
stating as follows:
“I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
The facts and data reported by the reviewer
and used in the review process are true and
correct.
The analysis, opinions, and conclusions in
this review report are limited only by the
assumptions and limiting conditions in this
review report and are my personal,
impartial, and unbiased professional
analyses, opinions, and conclusions.
I have no present or prospective interest in
the property that is the subject of the work
under review and neo personal interest with
respect to the parties involved.
I have no bias with respect to the property
that is the subject of the work under review
or to the parties involved with this
assignment.
My engagement in this assignment was not
contingent upon developing or reporting
predetermined results.
My compensation is not contingent on an
action or event resulting from the analyses,
_ opinions, or conclusions in this reviewer or
from its use.
GAOGC ULA\AC 2008\Charpentier AC. 1.doc
and
YOO sddd Bp29P Tress
Be:OT b6O0¢e te ver
Sa:1T
babs /62 / TH
* The reported analyses, opinions, and
conclusions were developed, and this report
has been prepared in conformity with the
requirements of the Code of Professional
Ethics & Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice of the Appraisal Institute, which
include the Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice.
* The use of this report is subject to the
requirements of the Appraisal Institute
relating to review by its duly authorized
representatives.
* I have not made a personal inspection of the
subject property of the work under review.
* No one provided significant appraisal,
appraisal review, or appraisal consulting
assistance to the person signing this
certification.”
24. On August 10, 2006, Respondent developed and
communicated to Vanguard Bank a review report of an appraisal
report developed by State Certified General Real Estate
Appraiser Thomas A. Marr.
25. In his review. report, Respondent evaluated Marr's
appraisal report for quality control and conformity with the
Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) .
See Exhibit E. A USPAP certification was not. attached to the
Marr’s review report.
26, Respondent informed the Department investigator that
during the period January 2006 through July 2008, he signed
approximately 770 appraisal review reports.
GAOGC ULA\AC 2008\Charpenticr AC.1 doc 7
ST/TT Savd YOO sddd Bp29P Tress Se-TT 6hae/ee/Ta
Be:OT b6O0¢e te ver
27. Section 475.626(1) (a), Florida Statutes, provides that
no person shall operate or attempt to operate as a registered
trainee, appraiser or licensed or certified appraiser without
being the holder of a valid and current registration, license,
or certification issued by the Department.
28. Section 475.612, Florida Statutes, provides that,
subject to. statutorily specified exceptions not relevant here, a
person may not:
(a) use the title “certified. real estate
appraiser, * “licensed real estate
appraiser,” or “registered trainee real
estate appraiser,” or any abbreviation or
words to that effect, or
(b) aissue an appraisal report, unless such
person is certified, Licensed; or registered
by the Department.
29, Section 475.611(1) (c), Florida Statutes, defines
appraisal report as:
any communication, written or oral, of an
appraisal, appraisal review, appraisal
consulting service, analysis, opinion, or
conclusion relating to the nature, quality,
value, or utility of a specified interest
in, or aspect of, identified real property,
and includes any report. communicating an
appraisal analysis, opinion, or conclusion
of value, regardless of title.
30. Section 475.611(1) (d), Florida Statutes, defines
‘appraisal review" as the act or process of developing and
communicating an opinion about the quality of another
appraiser's appraisal, appraisal report, or work.
GAOGC ULA\AC 2008\Charpentier AC.Lidoc 3
ST/éT avd YOO sddd Bp29P Tress Se-TT 6hae/ee/Ta
62:07 600¢ ge Yer
ST/ET
31.
Section 475,.611(1) (a), Florida Statutes,
“appraisal” or "appraisal services" to include:
32.
1. “Appraisal assignment”. . denotes an
engagement for which a person is employed or
retained to act, or could be perceived by
third parties or the public as acting, as an
agent or a disinterested third party in
rendering an unbiased analysis, opinion,
review, or conclusion relating to the
nature, quality, value, or utility of
specified interests in, or aspects of,
identified real property.
J 2. “Analysis assignment" denotes appraisal
services that relate to the employer's or
client's individual needs or investment
objectives and includes specialized
marketing, financing, and feasibility
studies as well as analyses, opinions, and
conclusions given in connection with
activities such as real estate brokerage,
mortgage banking, real estate counseling, or
real estate consulting.
3. “Appraisal review assignment” denotes an
engagement for which an appraiser is
employed or retained to develop and
communicate an opinion about the quality of
another appraiser's appraisal, appraisal
report, or work. An appraisal review may or
may not contain the reviewing appraiser's
opinion of value. :
defines
Section 475.611(2), Florida Statutes provides:
Wherever the word “operate” or "operating"
appears in this part with respect to a
registered trainee appraiser, licensed
appraiser, or certified appraiser; in any
order, rule, or regulation of the board; in
any pleading, indictment, or information
under this part; in any court action or
proceeding; or in any order or judgment of a
court, at shall be deemed to mean the
commission of one or more acts deseribed in
this part as constituting or defining a
GAOGC ULA\AC 2008\Charpentior AC.1 dos
and
YOO sddd Bp29P Tress
Of:0T 6o0¢ te ver
Sa:1T
babs /62 / TH
registered trainee appraiser, licensed
appraiser, or certified appraiser, not
including, however, any of the exceptions
stated therein. A single act is sufficient
to bring a- person within the meaning of this
subsection, and each act, if prohibited
herein, constitutes a separate offense.
COUNT ONE
33. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs 1 through 32 as if stated fully herein.
34, Based on the foregoing Respondent violated Section
475,612(1), Florida Statutes, Respondent violated Section
475.612, Florida Statutes, in one of more of the following ways:
(a) by using the titles “real estate appraiser,” “senior
real estate appraiser,” and/or “appraiser,” or any abbreviation
or words to that effect
(5) by issuing appraisal reports as defined by Section
475,611(1) (c), Florida Statutes without being certified,
‘licensed, or registered by the Department.
COUNT TWO
35. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates by reference
paragraphs 1 through 32 as if stated fully herein.
36. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
475.626(1) (a), Florida Statutes, by operating as a real estate
appraiser in the State of Florida without being the holder of a
valid and current: registration, license or certification in one
or more of the following ways:
GAOGC ULA\AG 2008\Charpentier AC.1.doc 10
ST/PT BK YOO sddd Bp29P Tress Se-TT 6hae/ee/Ta
OF:0T 600¢ se Yer
ta) by performing and issuing appraisal reviews as defined
by Section 475.611(1) (d), Florida Statutes;
(b) by ‘performing analysis assignments, 45 defined by
section 475.611(1) (a)2, Florida Statutes;
(c) by performing appraisal review assignments as defined
by Section 475.611(1) (a)3, Florida Statutes.
Wherefore, Petitioner respectfully requests that a Final
Order be entered imposing one. or more of the following
penalties: imposition of ‘an administrative fine not to exceed
$5,000 per incident, assessment of costs associated with the
investigation and prosecution (excluding costs associated with
an attorney’s time); and/or any other relief the Department is
authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 455 and 475, Florida
Statutes, and/or the rules promulgate
Signed nse Millon of
SA
GAOGC ULA\VAC 2008\Charpentier AC.1 doc
ST/ST Savd YOO sddd
Of:0T 6o0¢ te ver
Assistant General Counsel
Fla. Bar No. 734853
1940 North Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2202
Voice: (850) 414-0137
Facsimile: (850) 414-6749
‘PC Found: 1M /2b/ 2008
Bp29P Tress Se-TT 6hae/ee/Ta
Docket for Case No: 09-000374
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Oct. 01, 2009 |
Order Relinquishing Jurisdiction and Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Sep. 30, 2009 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Aug. 06, 2009 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 1, 2009; 9:30 a.m., Central Time; Shalimar, FL).
|
Jul. 09, 2009 |
Amended Joint Response to Order Granting Continuance filed.
|
Jun. 16, 2009 |
Joint Response to Order Granting Continuance filed.
|
Jun. 09, 2009 |
Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by June 16, 2009).
|
Jun. 03, 2009 |
Amended Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition (of C. Ketchum) filed.
|
May 29, 2009 |
Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition (of C. Ketcham) filed.
|
May 21, 2009 |
(Respondent's) Unopposed Motion for Continuance filed.
|
May 15, 2009 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for June 19, 2009; 10:00 a.m., Central Time; Shalimar, FL).
|
May 12, 2009 |
Petitioner's Motion to Continue Hearing filed.
|
Apr. 15, 2009 |
Letter to Judge Ruff from S. Ardelean in response to letter to Judge Ruff from D. Chesser dated April 10, 0009 filed.
|
Apr. 14, 2009 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for May 21, 2009; 10:00 a.m., Central Time; Shalimar, FL).
|
Apr. 13, 2009 |
Letter to Judge Ruff from D. Chesser regarding request for counsel for Petitioner confirm agreeance of taking deposition filed.
|
Apr. 07, 2009 |
Amended Response to Joint Response to Order Granting Continuance filed.
|
Apr. 06, 2009 |
Joint Response to Order Granting Continuance filed.
|
Mar. 31, 2009 |
Order Allowing Testimony by Telephone.
|
Mar. 27, 2009 |
Order Granting Continuance (parties to advise status by April 6, 2009).
|
Mar. 24, 2009 |
Notice of Service of Petitioner`s Exhibits and Witness List filed.
|
Mar. 24, 2009 |
Joint Motion to Continue Hearing and Petitioner`s Motion to Allow Testimony by Telephone and Alternative Motion to Set Hearing by Video Conference filed.
|
Feb. 05, 2009 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for April 3, 2009; 9:30 a.m., Central Time; Shalimar, FL).
|
Jan. 29, 2009 |
Unilateral Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Jan. 23, 2009 |
Initial Order.
|
Jan. 23, 2009 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jan. 23, 2009 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Jan. 23, 2009 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Jan. 29, 2008 |
Respondent`s Information Report filed.
|