Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: MAGALY RODRIGUEZ
Judges: ROBERT E. MEALE
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Mar. 23, 2009
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, July 31, 2009.
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2025
STATE OF FLORIDA Mp & *)
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION; “2, |
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD nin, 4
DIVISION I & II HEMEL» oy,
SPE On
Tifa
SPs
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND = OS Ne
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, OW \ te p (CL
Petitioner,
v. Case Nos. 2007-043465
2007-049032
2007-064645
MAGALY RODRIGUEZ,
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, Department of Business and Professional
Regulation, ("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint
before the Construction Industry Licensing Board, against Magaly
Rodriguez ("Respondent"), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating
the practice of contracting pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida
Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent is and has been, at all times material
hereto, a Certified General Contractor and a Certified
Residential Contractor in the State of Florida, having been
issued license numbers CGC1510414 and CRC1328362. Respondent is
and has been, at all times material hereto since October 9,
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465.Rodriguez. AC.doc 1
2006, a Certified Roofing Contractor in the State of Florida,
having been issued license number CCC1327637.
3. Respondent's last known address of record is 12231
S.W. 13lst Avenue, Miami, Florida 33186.
4. At all times material hereto with license numbers
.CGC1510414 and CRC1328362, and at all times material hereto on
and after October 9, 2006 with license number CCC1327637, the
Respondent was licensed as the qualifying agent of Construction
Masters of Southern Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation
(“Contractor”) with qualified business organization certificate
of authority (“QB license”) number QB44749. The Contractor’s QB
license expired on August 31, 2007 due to non-renewal on or
before that date, and it was not subsequently renewed.
5. Section 489.1195(1) (a), Florida Statutes, provides
that all primary qualifying agents for a business organization
are jointly and equally responsible for supervision of all
operations of the business organization; for all field work at
all sites; and for financial matters, both for the organization
in general and for each specific job.
COUNT ONE
6. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five as though fully set
forth in this Count One.
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465.Rodriguez.AC.doc 2
seas
veto!
7. Section 489.119(2) (d), Florida Statutes, provides
inter alia that a certificate of authority must be renewed every
2 years.
8. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (i), Florida Statutes (2005), by failing in
any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part
or violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
Case Number 2007-043465
9. On or about May 11, 2006 the Contractor entered into a
written contract with Jorge B. De Armas (hereinafter referred to
as “De Armas”) for the construction of a new bedroom and
bathroom addition to De Armas’s residence located at 8529 S.W.
133rd Place, Miami, Florida.
10. The contract price was $47,000,00.
11. The contract did not include an explanation of the
consumer’s rights under the Florida Homeowners’ Construction
Recovery Fund.
12. Pursuant to the contract, during the period from about
May 16, 2006 to December 1, 2006, De Armas made payments to the
Contractor totaling $37,000.00.
13. During the period May to July 2006 the Contractor
performed work in furtherance of the project. Thereafter, and
without just cause, the Contractor failed to perform further
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465.Rodriguez.AC.doc 3
seis?
work on the project until December 2006. Thereafter, and
without just cause, the Contractor failed to perform further
work on the project until March 2007. Thereafter, and without
just cause, the Contractor failed to perform further work,
thereby abandoning the project.
14. At the time of abandonment, the percentage of the
contract price paid exceeded the percentage of completion, and
the Contractor did not refund to De Armas any of the excess
funds.
COUNT TWO
15. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and nine through
fourteen as though fully set forth in this Count Two.
16. Section 489.1425, Florida Statutes, provides: any
agreement or contract for repair, restoration, improvement, or
construction to residential real property must contain a written
statement explaining the consumer’s rights under the Florida
Homeowners’ Construction Recovery Fund, except where the value
of all labor and materials does not exceed $2,500.
17. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489,.129(1) (i), Florida Statutes (2005), by failing in
any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part
or violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465.Rodriguez.AC.doc 4
COUNT THREE
18. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and nine through
fourteen as though fully set forth in this Count Three.
19. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1)(j), Florida Statutes (2005), by abandoning a
construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned
after 90 days if the contractor terminates the project without
just cause or without proper notification to the owner,
including the reason for termination, or fails to perform work
without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
COUNT FOUR
20. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and nine through
fourteen as though fully set forth in this Count Four.
21. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1)(g)2., Florida Statutes (2005), by committing
mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of contracting that
causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or
misconduct occurs when the contractor has abandoned a customer’s
job and the percentage of completion is less than the percentage
of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465.Rodriguez.AC.doc . 5
time of abandonment, unless the contractor is entitled to retain
such funds under the terms of the contract or refunds the excess
funds within 30 days after the date the job is abandoned.
Case Number 2007-049032
22. On or about February 1, 2006 the Contractor entered
into a written “contract with Juan Rodriguez’ (hereinafter
referred to as “Rodriguez”) for the construction of a new
playroom, office, and terrace addition to Rodriguez’s residence
located at 16313 S.W. 66th Street, Miami, Florida.
23. The contract price was $57,000.00. After a change
order on or about September 18, 2006 for a price increase to
cover the cost of 147 additional square feet of living space,
the contract price was $74,640.00.
24. The contract did not include an explanation of the
consumer’s rights under the Florida Homeowners’ © Construction
Recovery Fund.
25. The contract called for the payment of a materials
deposit of $17,000.00, and on or about February 1, 2006
Rodriguez paid that deposit. Pursuant to the contract, during
the period from about February 1, 2006 to December 18, 2006,
Rodriguez made payments to the Contractor totaling $64,640.00.
26. On or about May 1, 2006 the Contractor applied to the
Miami-Dade County building department for a building permit for
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465,Rodriguez.AC.doc 6
the project. The application was approved, and on or about
September 21, 2006 building permit number 2006129995 was issued.
27. During the period from June 2006 to October 2007 the
Contractor performed work on a sporadic basis in furtherance of
the project. Thereafter, and without just cause, the Contractor
failed to perform further work on the project, thereby
abandoning the project.
COUNT FIVE
28. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and twenty two through
twenty seven as though fully set forth in this Count Five.
29. Section 489.1425, Florida Statutes, provides: any
agreement or contract for repair, restoration, improvement, or
construction to residential real property must contain a written
statement explaining the consumer’s rights under the Florida
Homeowners’ Construction Recovery Fund, except where the value
of all labor and materials does not exceed $2,500.
30. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (i), Florida Statutes (2005), by failing in
any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part
or violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
G:\Ted_2008 Construction Cases\07-043465.Rodriguez.AC.doc 7
COUNT SIX
31. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs. one through five and twenty two through
twenty seven as though fully set forth in this Count Six.
32. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (0); Florida Statutes (2005), by proceeding on
any job without obtaining applicable local building department
permits and inspections, by commencing the project in this case
without having obtained a building permit.
COUNT SEVEN
33. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and twenty two through
twenty seven as though fully set forth in this Count Seven.
34. Section 489.126(2) (a), Florida Statutes, states: “A
contractor who receives, as initial payment, money totaling more
than 10 percent of the contract price for repair, restoration,
improvement, or construction to residential real property must
apply for permits necessary to do work within 30 days after the
date payment is made, except where the work does not require a
permit under the applicable codes and ordinances.”
35. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (i), Florida Statutes (2005), by failing in
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465.Rodriguez. AC.doc 8g
ore
any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part
or violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT EIGHT
36. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and twenty two through
twenty seven as though fully set forth in this Count Eight.
37. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1)(j), Florida Statutes (2005), by abandoning a
construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned
after 90 days if the contractor terminates the project without
‘just cause or without proper notification to the owner,
including the reason for termination, or fails to perform work
without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
Case Number 2007-064645
38. On or about September 30, 2006 the Contractor entered
into a written contract with Teofilo and Sara Noboa (hereinafter
referred to as the “Noboas”) for the construction of a new front
porch, master bedroom, bathroom, and family room addition and to
remodel the existing garage of the Noboas’ residence located at
3661 S.W. 16th Terrace, Miami, Florida.
39. The contract price was $97,000.00.
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465.Rodrignez. AC.doc 9
40. The contract did not include an explanation of the
consumer’s rights under the Florida Homeowners’ Construction
Recovery Fund.
41. Pursuant to the contract, during the period from about
October 4, 2006 to February 6, 2007, the Noboas made payments to
the Contractor totaling $90,500.00.
42. During the period from October 2006 to October 2007
the Contractor performed work on a sporadic basis in furtherance
of the project. Thereafter, and without just cause, the
Contractor failed to perform further work on the project,
thereby abandoning the project.
43. At the time of abandonment, the percentage of the
contract price paid exceeded the percentage of completion, and
the Contractor did not refund to the Noboas any of the excess
funds.
44, The Contractor’s subcontractors and material suppliers
recorded liens against the Noboas’ property for services for
which the Contractor received payment, as follows:
Name of Materials/ Lien :
Lienor Services Amount Recording Date
Amaralto Concrete Ready mix $4,639.96 March 29, 2007
Pump Inc. concrete
J&éM Scaffolds Rolli-off $750.30 Sept. 10, 2007
of Florida, Inc. container
Lighting Electric Elec. labor $4,680.00 Jan. 7, 2008
of Miami, Inc. & materials
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465.Rodriguez. AC.doc 10
The Contractor failed to remove the liens by payment or by bond
within 75 days or thereafter.
COUNT NINE
45. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and thirty eight
through forty four as though fully set forth in this Count Nine.
46. Section 489.1425, Florida Statutes, provides: any
agreement or contract for repair, restoration, improvement, or
construction to residential real property must contain a written
statement explaining the consumer’s rights under the Florida
Homeowners’ Construction Recovery Fund, except where the value
of all labor and materials does not exceed $2,500.
47. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (i), Florida Statutes (2005), by failing in
any material respect to comply with the provisions of this part
or violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT TEN
48. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and thirty eight
through forty four as though fully set forth in this Count Ten.
49, Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1)(j), Florida Statutes (2005), by abandoning a
construction project in which the contractor is engaged or under
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465, Rodriguez. AC.doc nh
contract as a contractor. A project may be presumed abandoned
after 90 days if the contractor terminates the project without
just cause or without proper notification to the owner,
including the reason for termination, or fails to perform work
without just cause for 90 consecutive days.
COUNT ELEVEN
50. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and thirty eight
through forty four as though fully set forth in this Count
Eleven.
51. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1)(g)1., Florida Statutes (2005), by committing
mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of contracting that
causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or
misconduct occurs when valid liens have been recorded against
the property of a contractor’s customer for supplies or services
ordered by the contractor for the customer’s job; the contractor
has received funds from the customer to pay for the supplies or
services; and the contractor has not had the liens removed from
the property, by payment or by bond, within 75 days after the
date of such liens.
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465. Rodriguez. AC.doc 12
COUNT TWELVE
52. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and thirty eight
through forty four as though fully set forth in this Count
Twelve.
53. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated
Section 489.129(1) (g)2., Florida Statutes (2005), by committing
mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of contracting that
causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or
misconduct occurs when the contractor has abandoned a customer’s
job and the percentage of completion is less than the percentage
of the total contract price paid to the contractor as of the
time of abandonment, unless the contractor is entitled to retain
such funds under the terms of the contract or refunds the excess
funds within 30 days after the date the job is abandoned.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the
Construction Industry Licensing Board enter an Order imposing
one or more of the following penalties: place on probation,
reprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or
renewal of the certificate or registration, require financial
restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to
exceed $10,000 per violation, require continuing education,
assess costs associated with investigation and prosecution,
G:\Ted 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465.Rodriguez. AC.doc 13
impose any or all = penalties delineated within Section
455,.227(2), Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the
Board is authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 489, 455,
Florida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder.
te
Signed this 28 day of 1 2008.
eee
> fen, Geom
Theodore R. Gay.
Assistant General Counsel
Florida Bar No. 242896
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
Office of the General Counsel
8240 NW 52™ Terrace, Suite 304
Miami, Florida 33166
(305) 470-6783 ext. 2225 Telephone
(305) 470-5781 Facsimile
PC Found: May 27, 2008 _
Div. I: Clark & Bonuso
Div. I: Holloway & Weller
FILED
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
DEPUTY CLERK
G:ATed 2008 Construction Cases\07-043465_Rodriguez.AC.doc 14
Docket for Case No: 09-001526PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Aug. 03, 2009 |
Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding exhibits to the agency.
|
Jul. 31, 2009 |
Order Relinquishing Jurisdiction and Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Jul. 31, 2009 |
Petitioner's Motion to Cancel Hearing and to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Jul. 30, 2009 |
Order Denying Continuance of Final Hearing.
|
Jul. 30, 2009 |
Respondent's Reply to Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Motion to Continue filed.
|
Jul. 29, 2009 |
Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Motion to Continue filed.
|
Jul. 29, 2009 |
Motion to Continue filed.
|
Jul. 28, 2009 |
Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for August 4 through 7, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Miami, FL; amended as to Hearing Location).
|
Jul. 24, 2009 |
CASE STATUS: Pre-Hearing Conference Held. |
Jul. 24, 2009 |
Order Granting Motion to Amend Administrative Complaint
|
Jul. 23, 2009 |
Petitioner's Renewed Motion to Amend Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jul. 17, 2009 |
Petitioner's Exhibit List (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
|
Jul. 17, 2009 |
Petitioner's Notice of Filing Exhibits and Exhibit List filed.
|
Jul. 17, 2009 |
Petitioner's Motion to Amend Administrative Complaint filed.
|
May 21, 2009 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for August 4 through 7 and 10 through 12, 2009; 9:30 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
|
May 11, 2009 |
(Respondent`s) Motion to Continue filed.
|
Apr. 01, 2009 |
Order Directing Filing of Exhibits
|
Apr. 01, 2009 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Apr. 01, 2009 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for May 19, 22, May 22 and June 1 through 5, 2009; 9:30 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Mar. 31, 2009 |
Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 09-1526PL and 09-1527PL).
|
Mar. 30, 2009 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Consolidate and Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Mar. 25, 2009 |
Unilateral Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Mar. 23, 2009 |
Initial Order.
|
Mar. 23, 2009 |
Request for Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Mar. 23, 2009 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Mar. 23, 2009 |
Agency referral
|