Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AND ENGINEERING, INC., AND WARREN MERTINS, 09-004913 (2009)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 09-004913 Visitors: 10
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
Respondent: ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AND ENGINEERING, INC., AND WARREN MERTINS
Judges: CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Sep. 10, 2009
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, November 30, 2009.

Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2024
FILED Department of Business and Professional Regutstion Deputy Agency Clerk CLERK , Brandon Nichols b q- 4 | % Dete 8/6/2009 STATE OF FLORIDA : DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, . —P DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND Qo Ne, PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Qf 4p ke BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE yk, AND INTERIOR DESIGN, isn Va Vipin Aa, Petitioner, os “hn vs. CASE NO.: 2009-04867 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES & ENGINEERING, INC., AND WARREN MERTINS, Respondents, / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Architecture and Interior Design against ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES & ENGINEERING, INC. and WARREN MERTINS, (“Respondents”), and says: 1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of architecture and interior design pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 481, Florida Statutes. 2. The Department of Business and Professional Regulation has jurisdiction over the unlicensed practice of architecture and interior design pursuant to Section 455.228(1), and Section 481.223(1)(a), Florida Statutes. 3. Respondents’ last known address is 24710 State Road 54, Lutz, Florida 33559. 4. At all times material hereto, Respondents were not duly registered or certified to engage in the practice of architecture or interior design pursuant to Chapter 481, Florida Statutes. 5. Respondents are doing business as Architectural Services & Engineering, Inc. 6. Respondents are not licensed to practice architecture in the State of Florida and therefore cannot offer architectural services in its business name. 7. Respondent Warren Mertins is offering architectural services on the Internet. 8. Respondent Warren Mertins is not licensed to practice architecture in the State of Florida and therefore cannot offer architectural services. COUNTI 9. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through eight (8) as if fully set forth herein. 10. Section 481.223(1)(a), Florida Statutes, states that a person may not knowingly “practice architecture unless the person is an architect or a registered architect.” 11. Based upon the foregoing, Respondents have violated Section 481.223(1)(a), Florida Statutes, by practicing architecture when they were not the holder of a valid license by offering architectural services. COUNT II 12. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through eight (8) as if fully set forth herein. 13. Section 481.223(1)(c), Florida Statutes, states that a person may not knowingly “use the name or title ‘architect’ or ‘registered architect’ or words to that effect, when the person is not then the holder of a valid license.” 14. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondents have violated Section 481.223(1)(c), Florida Statutes, by using the name or title “architect”, when they were not the holder of a valid license. COUNT Il 15. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through eight (8) as if fully set forth herein. 16. Section 481.219(2), Florida Statutes, requires a certificate of authorization for a corporation, partnership, or fictitious name offering architectural services. 17, Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent, Architectural Services & Engineering, Inc., has violated Section 481.219(2), Florida Statutes, by offering architectural services without a certificate of authorization. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board enter an Order imposing an administrative fine not to exceed $5,000 per count, assess costs associated with investigation and prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2), Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 481 and 455, Florida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder. u Signed this pet dayof_ _Te/ of , 2009. “BSD ye DAVID K. MINACCI Smith, Thompson, Shaw & Manausa, P.A. 3520 Thomasville Road, Fourth Floor Tallahassee, Florida 32309 FL Bar No. 0056774 Ph: (850) 402-1570 Fax: (850) 241-0161 PCP: July 29, 2009 Rodriguez Wirtz Gustafson

Docket for Case No: 09-004913
Issue Date Proceedings
Nov. 30, 2009 Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
Nov. 30, 2009 Motion to Dimiss Formal Hearing filed.
Oct. 29, 2009 Answer to Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories filed.
Oct. 07, 2009 Response to Petitioner's First Request for Production filed.
Oct. 07, 2009 Response to Request for Admissions filed.
Sep. 29, 2009 Order Directing Filing of Exhibits
Sep. 29, 2009 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Sep. 29, 2009 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for December 1, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
Sep. 24, 2009 Supplemental Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed.
Sep. 22, 2009 Petitioner's Response to Initial Order filed.
Sep. 15, 2009 Unilateral Response to Initial Order filed.
Sep. 10, 2009 Election of Rights filed.
Sep. 10, 2009 Administrative Complaint filed.
Sep. 10, 2009 Notice of Filing Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories, First Requests for Production and Requests for Admission filed.
Sep. 10, 2009 Referral Letter filed.
Sep. 10, 2009 Initial Order.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer