Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING
Respondent: GARY EDWARD RUEHLING, R.N.
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: St. Petersburg, Florida
Filed: Sep. 17, 2009
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, November 24, 2009.
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2024
SEP-17-2089 15:45 AHCA Sep te 2009 15:02
P.B4/14
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
PETITIONER,
Vv. CASE NO. 2009-07766
GARY EDWARD RUEHLING, R.N,,
RESPONDENT.
ADMINIST RATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its
undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint before the
Board of Nursing against Respondent, Gary Edward Ruehling, R.N., and in
support thereof alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state department charged with regulating the
practice of nursing pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida Statutes; Chapter
456, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 464, Florida Statutes.
2. At.all times material to this Complaint, Respondent was’ 4
licensed registered nurse (R.N.) within the state of Florida, having been
issued license number RN 1914882.
SEP-17-2889 15:45 AHCA Sep 1? 2009 15:02
P.@514
3. Respondent's address of record is 6722 16th Avenue North, St.
petersburg, Florida 33710.
4. A secondary address for Respondent is 9209 Seminole
Boulevard, Apt. 9, Seminole, Florida 33772.
5 At all times material to this complaint the Respondent was
employed as a R.N. at Paims of Pasadena Hospital (PPH) in St. Petersburg,
Florida.
6. On or about February 16, 2009, Respondent provided a urine
specimen for use in an amployer-ordered drug test. :
7. The collector sealed the specimen, prepared a chain of custody
form, and sent the specimen to Kroll Laboratory Specialists, Inc., (Kroll) in
Gretna Louisiana. ,
‘8. When the specimen arrived at Kroll on or about February 17,
2009, Kroll scientists performed an initial drug screen of the specimen
using the immunoassay method.
9, Immunoassay is a drug testing method used for determining
the presence of drugs in human biological fluids such as urine.
Immunoassay measures the presence of drugs by adding to the specimen
specific antibodies that bind with the drug being measured. The antibodies
Department of Health v. Gary Ruehling, R.N. 2
Case Number 2009-07766
J\PSU\Nursing\Blanche, Megan\Ac\Test positive\Ruehiing, RN —SO Mathadone.doc
SEP-17-2889 15:45 AHCA Sep Le 2003 15:02
are identified, usually with an enzyme marker, enabling the scientist to
determine the presence and amount of drug in the specimen.
10. Utilizing the immunoassay method, Kroll scientists determined
that Respondent’s urine specimen tested positive for the presence ‘of
methadone.
11. According to Section 893.03(2), Florida Statutes, methadone is
a Schedule II controlled substance that has a high potential for abuse and
has a currently accepted, but severely restricted, medical use in treatment
in the United States. Abuse of this substance may lead to severe
‘psychological or physical dependence.
12. On or about February 18, 2009, Kroll scientists conducted
confirmation tests for methadone and opiates, on Respondent urine
specimen using a gas chromatography/mass spectrometry test (GC/MS).
43. GC/MS is a drug testing method that is different in scientific
principle than the immunoassay method. A special instrument, the gas
chromatographer, utilizes the chemical properties, such as boiling point, of
chemical compounds in order to separate the compounds that are present
in a specimen. After separating the compounds in the specimen, another
Department of Health v. Gary Ruehling, R.N. 3
Case Number 2009-07766
J \PSU\Nursing\Blancho, Megan\Ac\Test positive\Ruehiing, RN ESO Methadone.dor
P6714
SEP-17-2889 15:46 SHA Sep lf 2009 15:08
instrument, the mass spectrometer, is used to identify each chemicat ,
compound, based on the compound's mass.
14, The GC/MS test confirmed the presence of methadone in
Respondent's urine specimen.
15. Respondent timely requested that his original urine specimen
be retested. ,
16. On or about March 4, 2009, Kroll reported the results the re-
test of Respondent's original urine sample, re-confirming the presence of
methadone in Respondent's urine specimen to PPH.
17, Respondent did not have a prescription for methadone.
18. Respondent did not have a legitimate medical reason for using
methadone.
19. Section 464.018(1)(n), Florida Statutes (2008), provides that
failing to meet minimal standards of acceptable and prevailing nursing ,
practice, including engaging in acts for which the licensee is not qualified
by training or experience, constitutes grounds for disciplinary action.
20. Rule 64B9-8.005(2)(k), Florida Administrative Code, provides
that failing to meet or departing from minimal standards of acceptable and
Department of Health v. Gary Ruehling, R.N. 4
Case Number 2009-07766
J:\PsU\Nursing\Blancho, Megan\ac\Test positive\Ruenling, RN £SQ Methadone.doc
ard
Sep 1? 2009 15:03
SEP-17-2089 15:46 AHCA
: P.@6/14
prevailing nursing practice shall include testing positive for any drugs under
Chapter 893, Florida Statutes, on any drug screen when the nurse does not
have a prescription and legitimate medical reason for using such drugs.
21. On or about February 16, 2009, Respondent submitted to a
urine drug screen that returned positive for methadone, which is listed
under Chapter 893, Florida Statutes. Respondent did not have a
prescription or a legitimate medical reason for using methadone.
22. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section
464.018(1)(n), Florida Statutes (2008), failing to meet minimal standards
of acceptable and prevailing nursing practice, including engaging in acts for
which the licensee is not qualified by training or experience, as defined by
Rule 6489-8.005(2)(k), Florida Administrative Code, to include testing
positive for any drugs under Chapter 893, Florida Statutes, on any drug
screen when the nurse does not have a prescription and legitimate medical
reason for using such drugs.
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of
Nursing enter an order imposing one or more of the following penalties:
permanent revocation or suspension of Respondent’s license, restriction of
practice, imposition of an administrative fine, issuance of a reprimand,
Department of Heatth v. Gary Ruehling, R.N. 5
Case Number 2009-07766
J:\PSU\Nursing\Blancho, Megan\Ac\Test positive\Ruehiing, RN ESO Methadone.dec
SEP-17-2089 15:46 AHCA Sep 17 2003 19105
P6914
placement of the Respondent on probation, corrective action, refund of
fees billed or collected, remedial education and/or any other relief that the
Board deems appropriate.
SIGNED this | 4 say of : fu ly 2009.
U
Ana M. Viamonte Ros, M.D., M.P.H.
State Surgeon General
We 0 kate
Megan M. Blancho
Assistant General Counsel
DOH Prosecution Services Unit
4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin c-65
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3265
Florida Bar Number 0860921
(850) 245 - 4640 Telephone
(850) 245 - 4683 Facsimile
/MMB
pcp: fu ly. 162%,
PCP Members Lemaf? 2 botgor”
Department of Health v. Gary Ruehting, RN. 6
Case Number 2009-07766
2:\PSU\Nursing\Blancho, Megan\AC\Test positive\Ruehling, RN ESO Methadone.doc
SEP-17-2089 15:47 AHCA Sep 17 2003 t108
P.1a@714
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Respondent has the right to request a hearing to be
conducted in accordance with Section 120.569 and 120.57,
Florida Statutes, to be represented by counsel or other qualified
representative, to present evidence and argument, to call and
cross-examine witnesses and to have subpoena and subpoena
duces tecum issued on his oF her behalf if a hearing is requested.
NOTICE REGARDING ASSESSMENT OF COSTS.
Respondent is placed on notice that Petitioner has incurred
costs related to the investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Pursuant to Section 456.07 2(4), Florida Statutes, the Board shall
assess costs related to the investigation and prosecution of a
disciplinary matter, which may include attorney hours and costs,
on the Respondent in addition to any other discipline imposed.
Deparment of Health v. Gary Ruehiing, RN, 7
Case Number 2009-07766
T:\PSU\Nursing\Blancho, Megan\ac\Test positive\Ruehling, RN ESO Methadone.doc
Docket for Case No: 09-005113PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Nov. 24, 2009 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Nov. 16, 2009 |
Joint Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Nov. 02, 2009 |
Order Denying Motion to Deem Admitted.
|
Nov. 02, 2009 |
CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held. |
Nov. 02, 2009 |
Respondent's Exhibits (exhibits not available for viewing) filed. |
Oct. 30, 2009 |
(Respondent's Motion to Withdraw Administrative Complaint) filed.
|
Oct. 26, 2009 |
Motion to Deem Admitted and to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Oct. 02, 2009 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Oct. 02, 2009 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for December 14, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; St. Petersburg and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Sep. 24, 2009 |
Amended Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Sep. 24, 2009 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Sep. 18, 2009 |
Petitioner's First Request for Production of Documents filed.
|
Sep. 18, 2009 |
Petitioner's First Request for Interrogatories filed.
|
Sep. 18, 2009 |
Petitioner's First Request for Admissions to Respondent filed.
|
Sep. 18, 2009 |
Notice of Serving Petitioner's First Request for Admissions, Interrogotaries and Production of Documents filed.
|
Sep. 18, 2009 |
Initial Order.
|
Sep. 17, 2009 |
Notice of Appearance (filed by W. Miller).
|
Sep. 17, 2009 |
Notice of Appearance (filed by M. Lawrence).
|
Sep. 17, 2009 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Sep. 17, 2009 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Sep. 17, 2009 |
Agency referral filed.
|