Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN
Respondent: DAVID M. PUTNAM
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Titusville, Florida
Filed: Oct. 21, 2010
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, November 15, 2010.
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2025
FILED
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Deputy Agency Clerk
CLERK Evette L Proctor
Date 8/31/2010
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND aks,
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, } O 7 q {39 P L ZY “4
BOARD OF ARHITECTURE gr o “
AND INTERIOR DEISGN, Boo, Cy eS,
gk, Se kD
Petitioner. CLE, -
, For ge vy,
Py On rn
if .
vs. CASE NO.: 2010-001 ey
DAVID PUTNAM,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner,’ DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Architecture and Interior
Design against DAVID PUTNAM, (“Respondent”), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of architecture
pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 481, Florida Statutes,
2. Respondent, is and has been at all times material hereto, a licensed architect in the
State of Florida, having been issued license number AR 3170.
3. Respondents’ address of record is 1701 South Washington Avenue, Titusville, FL
32780.
4. Eddie Hall (“Hall”) entered into a contract to provide architectural services for a
commercial project known as 7 Minuteman Cswy., located at 7 S. Atlantic Ave., Cocoa Beach,
Florida.
5. Hall prepared the drawings for the project.
6. ~ Atal! times material hereto, Hall was not duly registered or certified to engage
in the practice of architecture pursuant 1o Chapter 481, Florida Statutes,
7. Respondent signed and sealed the plans prepared by Hall for permitting.
8. ‘The aforementioned plans and drawings were prepared outside of Respondent's
office.
9, Respondent failed to maintain as evidence of his efforts: written calculations,
correspondence, time records, check prints, telephone logs, site visit logs or research done for the
project.
10. Respondent failed to maintain written documentation that he has personally
supervised the preparation of all documents and instruments of service, reviewed al] project data,
personally inspected the project site and entered into a written agreement with the persons
preparing the documents accepting professional responsibility for such work.
11. The Respondent was not present when the plans were delivered to the client.
12. Respondent did not supervise the preparation of the aforementioned plans and
drawings.
us
The Respondent functioned as essentially a “plan stamper” for Hall's plans
since Hall is not licensed to practice architecture in the State of Florida.
4. The Respondent has adopted the aforementioned plans as his own work and
thereby accepted professional responsibility for the aforementioned plans.
5. In preparation of the plans and drawings, Respondent was negligent in that he
failed to exercise due care to conform acceptable standards of architectural practice in such a
manner as to be detrimental to the public.
16. The plans and drawings were not of sufficiently high standard to clearly and
accurately indicate or illustrate all essential parts of the work to which they refer.
17. The Respondents’ title block fails to comply with Rule 61G1-16.004, Florida
Administrative Code
COUNTI
18, Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through seventeen
(17) as if fully set forth herein.
19, Section 481.221(4), Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part that no registered
architect shall affix her or his signature or seal to any final construction document or instrument
of service which includes drawings, plans, specifications, or architectural documents which were
not prepared by her or him or under her or his responsible supervising cantrol or by another
registered architect and reviewed, approved, or modified and adopted by her or him as her or his
own work according to rules adopted by the board.
20. Rule 61G1-23.015(1), Administrative Code, require the architect to prepare and
maintain as evidence of the architect’s efforts: written calculations, correspondence, time
records, check prints, telephone logs, site visit logs or research done for the project and shall
provide such evidence to state or local authorities upon their request.
21. Rule 61G1-23.015(2), Administrative Code, requires the architect to maintain
written documentation that the architect has personally supervised the preparation of all
documents and instruments of service, reviewed all project data, personally inspected the project
site and entered into a written agreement with the persons preparing the documents accepting
professional responsibility for such work.
22. Rule 61G1-23.015(3), Administrative Code, requires the architect 10 be present
whenever such final work is submitted to a client, in order to respond to questions and maintain
wrilien minutes of such a submission meeting.
23. Based upon the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section 481 .221{4), Florida
Statutes, and Rule 61G1~23.015, Administrative Code, by improperly certifying work prepared
by another.
COUNT II
24, Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through seventeen
(17) as if fully set forth herein.
25. Section 481.225(1)(i), Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part that no registered
architect shall aid, assist, procure, or advise any unlicensed person to practice architecture
contrary to this part or to a ruje of the department or the board.
26. Based upon the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section 481.225(1)@), Florida
Statutes, by assisting Hal] in his performance of unlicensed activity contrary to Chapter 481,
Florida Statutes.
COUNT ID
27. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through seventeen
(17) as if fully sec forth herein.
28. Section 481.225(1}(g), Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part that committing
any act of fraud, deceit, negligence, in competency, or misconduct in the practice of architecture
constitutes grounds for disciplinary action.
29, Based upon the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section 481 225(1)(g),
Florida Statutes by signing and sealing plans that do not conform to acceptable standards of
architectural practice.
COUNT IV
30. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through seventeen
(17) as if fully set forth herein.
31. Section 481 .221(6), Florida Statutes, states final construction documents or
instruments of service which include plans, drawings, specifications, or other architectural
documents prepared by a registered architect as part of her or his architectural practice shall be of
a sufficiently high standard to clearly and accurately indicate or illustrate all essential parts of the
work to which they refer.
32. Based upon the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section 481.221(6), Florida
Statutes by signing and sealing plans that are not sufficiently detailed.
COUNT V
33. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates paragraphs one (1) through seventeen
(17) as if fully set forth herein.
34, Section 48].225(1)(a), Florida Statutes, states in pertinent part that violating any
rule of the board lawfully adopted pursuant to this part or Chapier 455 constitutes grounds for
disciplinary action.
35, Rule 61G1-16.004, Florida Administrative Code, requires the title block to
contain:
a. Firm name, address, and telephone number.
b.' Firm license number.
c. Name or identification of project.
d. Date prepared.
e. A space for the signature and dated sealed.
f. A space for the printed name of the person sealing the document.
36. Based upon the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section 481 .225(1), Florida
Statutes and Rule 61G-16.004, Florida Administrative Code, by submitting construction
documents for permit with a title block that is in violation.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board enter an Order imposing onc
or more of the following penalties: Imposition of probation, reprimand the licensee. revoke,
suspend, deny the issuance or renewal of the certificate or registration, require financial
restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to exceed $5,000 per count, requirc
conunuing education, assess costs associated with investigation and prosecution. impose any or
all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2), Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that
the Board ts authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 481 and 455, Florida Statutes, and/or the
rules promulgated thereunder.
—
Signed this zoel day of Axs ea & 2010.
> > ~~ J .
DAVID K. MINACCI
Smith, Thompson, Shaw & Manausa, P.A.
3520 Thomasville Road, Fourth Floor
Tallahassee, Florida 32309
FL Bar No. 0056774
Ph: — (850) 402-1570
Fax: (850) 241-0161
PCP: August 18, 2010
Rodriguez
Wirtz
Gustafson
Docket for Case No: 10-009839PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Nov. 15, 2010 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Nov. 12, 2010 |
Motion to Dismiss Formal Hearing filed.
|
Nov. 08, 2010 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Nov. 08, 2010 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for December 14, 2010; 9:00 a.m.; Titusville, FL).
|
Oct. 28, 2010 |
Petitioner's Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Oct. 25, 2010 |
Initial Order.
|
Oct. 21, 2010 |
Notice of Filing Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories, First Requests for Production and Requests for Admission filed.
|
Oct. 21, 2010 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Oct. 21, 2010 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Oct. 21, 2010 |
Referral Letter filed.
|