Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE
Respondent: DENNIS A. CORTES, M.D.
Judges: JOHN G. VAN LANINGHAM
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Miramar, Florida
Filed: Dec. 02, 2010
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.
Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
PETITIONER,
Vv. ; CASE NO.:2009-15984
DENNIS A CORTES, M.D.,
| RESPONDENT,
a
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
comes NOW, Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its
undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint before the
Board of Medicine against Respondent, Dennis A, Cortes, M.D., and in
support thereof alleges:
1, ‘Petitioner is the state department charged with regulating the
practice of medicine Pursuant to Section 20,43, Florida Statutes; Chapter
456, Florida Statutes; and Chapter 458, Florida Statutes,
2, At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent was a
licensed physician within the State of Florida and was board certified in
internal medicine having: been issued ficense number ME 66763.
JAPSU\MadicaliRober Milne\Cases\Cortes ‘DS L5984\CORTES AC 040610.doc 1
30"d POLL Ol0Z 2 280
Sool ato z saq
3. | Respondent's address of record is PO. Box 821068, South
Florida, Ro 33082.
4. On or about May 18, 2004, JK, a 66 year-old male, presented to
Memorial Hospital Pembroke, Broward County, Florida, complaining of
paltations, he was admitted by and came under the Respondent's care.
5. _ Respondent referred JK to both cardiology and pulmonary
specialists on or about May 18, 2004,
6. A chest radiograph dated May 18, 2004, revealed evidence of
fluid or mass lesion in the lateral aspect of the left chest extending into the
left hilum, (Above and behind the cardiac impression is a triangular
depression named the ‘hilum, where the structures which form the root of
the lung enter and leave that organ).
7. Respondent's progress notes of May 19, 2004, States, “CXR
pneumonia vs, mass” with a plan for a chest CT scan,
8, The pulmonary speciatist’s Progress notes of May 19, 2004, also
comments on the chest radiograph’s left hilar abnormality and Respondent
concurred in the chart with the Pulmonary specialist's “recommend to
follow”, comment concerning the CT scan of JK’s chest.
9. On May 19, 2004, JK’s CT chest scan results showed:
J.\PSU\Medical\Rabert Milne\Cases\Cortes 09-15984\CORTES AC 040610.doc 2
fod POtLL OlOe @ 78d
so:0T Ode 2 Jaq
“soft tissue density lateral aspect left upper lobe
appearing to represent consolidation atelectasis,
Resolution should be evaluated on interval follow up
study”.
10, Atelectasis is defined as the lack of gas exchange within alveoii,
due to alveolar collapse or fluid consolidation.
11. ! On May 20, 2004, Respondent wrote in JK’s progress notes “CT
atelectasis with palpitations negative work up and discharge home” when
in fact the abnormal x-ray results and CT scan concerning the lateral aspect
of JK’s left lung needed to be followed up with a repeat CT scan.
12, | | Respondent neglected to advise both JK and Jk’s primary care
physician that JK had an unresolved abnormality shown in the lateral
aspect of his left lung that needed to be followed up with a repeat CT scan.
13. Respondent failed to either provide the diagnostic measures or
a plan for follow Up to distinguish between fluid or mass lesion in the
lateral aspect of JK’s left chest extending into the left hilum.
14, Subsequenty JK was evaluated and diagnosed with non small
cell lung cancer in 2006 which was metastatic to the central nervous
system. JK was treated with chemotherapy and: radiation therapy but
SUCCUMDed to his metastic cancer on September 1, 2007,
2:\PSU\Medical\Robert Miine\Cases\Cortes 09-15984\CORTES ac 040610.doc : 3
80d GO:LL OloZ Z 280
Sool otoz z 2aq
COUNT ONE
15. Paragraphs 1 through 14 are adopted and realleged as though
fully set orth
16. Section 458, 331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2003), provides that
the gross OF repeated malpractice or the failure to practice medicine with
that level Of care, skill, and treatment which is recognized by a reasonably
Prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and
ccumstafces | is grounds for discipline by the Board of Medicine.
17. _ Respondent failed to practice medicine with that level of care,
skill, and eaten which is recognized by a reasonably prudent similar
physician as being acceptable under similar conditions and circumstances,
in one or more of the following ways:
la. by neglecting to advise Patient 3K that JK had unresolved
abnormal chest CT scan and X-ray results that required further follow
UP, :
b. by failing to provide the follow up diagnostic measures to
distinguish between fluid or mass lesion in the lateral aspect of the
left chest extending into the left hilum;
i .
J:\PSU\Medieal Robert Milne \Cases\Cortes 09-15984\CORTES AC (40610.doc
Bo'd = S0FLL LOZ 2 980
Sool ato z saq
C. by failing to complete an adequate follow up assessment
of Ks condition in failing to distinguish between fluid or mass lesion
in the lateral aspect of the left chest extending into the left hilum;
! d. by neglecting to advise Patient Jk’s Primary care
ohysician that JK had an unresolved abnormal chest CT scan and X-
ray t results that required further diagnostic screening;
| e@. by failing to create an appropriate follow up plan for the
evaluation and management of Jk’s condition;
18. ‘Based an the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section
458,331( 1\(t), Florida Statutes (2003).
, COUNT TWO
19, Paragraphs 1 through 14 are adopted and realleged as though
fully set fort,
20. Section 458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2003), subjects a
licensee to disciptine for failing to keep legible, as defined by department
rule in consultation with the board, medical records that identify the
licensed physician or the physician extender and supervising physician by
name and professional title who is or are responsible for rendering,
ordering, supervising, or billing for each diagnostic or treatment procedure
J.\PSU\Medical\Robert Milne\Cases\Cortes O8-15984\CORTES AC 040610.doc Ei
Ol'd GSOtLL Oboe @ 78q
90:01 OT0¢ 2 Jaq
and that justify the course of treatment of the patient, including, but not
limited to, patient histories; examination results; test results; records of
drugs prescribed, dispensed, or administered; and reports of consultations
and hospkalzations
21. | On May 20, 2004, Respondent wrote in Jk’s progress notes “CT
atelectasis, with palpitations negative work up and discharge home” when
in fact the abnormal x-ray results and CT scan concerning the lateral .
aspect of x $ left lung! needed to be followed up with a repeat CT sean.
22, | Based on the foregoing Respondent has violated section
458.33191)(m), Florida Statutes (2003).
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of
Medicine enter 8n order imposing one or more of the following penalties:
permanent revocation Or Suspension of Respondent's license, restriction of
practice, imposition Of an administrative fine, issuance of a reprimand,
placernent of the Respondent on probation, corrective action, refund of
fees billed or collected, remedial education and/or any other relief that the
Board deems appropriate.
J:\PSU\Medical\Robert Milne\Cases\Cortes O9-15984\CORTES AC 040610.doc 6
|
Lhd GO-LL OlOe @ 78d
90:01 OT0¢ 2 Jaq
Assistant General Counsel
’ Florida Bar # 622338
DOH Prosecution Services Unit
4052 Bald Cypress Way-Bin C-65
Tallahassee, Florida 32399- 3265
(850) 245-4640 Office
(850) 245-4681 Facsimile
ENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTUE CLERK
Encl: Article 1 .
ag ahi, Nulline
PCP Members: HC - Balu, M
PCP: Chorct, 1420/0
J\PSU\Medical\Robert Mine\Cases\Cortes 09-15984\CORTES AC 040610.dec
zL'd Q07LL olnz 2 28g
90:01 o10Z Zz saq
Docket for Case No: 10-010471PL