Filed: Nov. 28, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOV 28, 2007 No. 07-12167 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00457-CR-3-LAC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGEL CANALES-REYES, Defendant-Appellant. _ No. 07-12168 Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 07-00031-CR-3-LAC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGEL CANALES-REYES, Defendant-Appellant. _
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOV 28, 2007 No. 07-12167 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00457-CR-3-LAC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGEL CANALES-REYES, Defendant-Appellant. _ No. 07-12168 Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 07-00031-CR-3-LAC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANGEL CANALES-REYES, Defendant-Appellant. _ ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
NOV 28, 2007
No. 07-12167 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00457-CR-3-LAC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANGEL CANALES-REYES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
No. 07-12168
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 07-00031-CR-3-LAC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANGEL CANALES-REYES,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(November 28, 2007)
Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and MARCUS, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Angel Canales-Reyes in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Canales-Reyes’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2