Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY
Respondent: SHORT CUTS AND STYLES AND ALPHONSO BRAT
Judges: JUNE C. MCKINNEY
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: West Palm Beach, Florida
Filed: Mar. 28, 2013
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, May 29, 2013.
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2024
FILED
Department of Business arid Professional Regulation
Deputy Agency Clerk
STATE OF FLORIDA ck Og
‘vette Lawson-Proctor
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULAT| pete 4/40/2013
File #
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Petitioner,
Vv. Case No. 2011032719
2011032975
SHORT CUTS & STYLES and ALPHONSO BRAT,
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
(Petitioner) files this Administrative Complaint before the
Board of Cosmetology (Board), against Short Cuts & Styles and
Alphonso Brat (Respondent), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating
the practice of cosmetology pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida
Statutes (2010), and Chapters 455 and 477, Florida Statutes
(2010), and the rules promulgated thereto.
2. At all times material hereto, Short Cuts & Styles was
registered as a cosmetology salon having been issued license
number CE 9984915.
3. At all times material to this complaint, Alphonso Brat
was a co-owner of Short Cuts & Styles.
4. Respondent’s address of record is 10300 West Forest
Hill Boulevard, West Palm Beach, Florida, 33414, and 6315 Green
Hedge Court, West Palm Beach, Florida 33411, respectively.
FINDINGS OF FACT
5. On or about May 20, 2011, Petitioner’s inspector
conducted an inspection of Respondent.
6. During the aforementioned inspection, the inspector
observed the following documentation and/or sanitation
violations:
a. Respondent failed to ensure all
individuals displayed a current, laminated
license;
b. Respondent failed to remove hair
from the floor and store it in a closed
container;
c. Respondent failed to maintain a
wet sanitizer with a cover;
d. Respondent failed to utilize
hospital quality/EPA approved disinfecting
methods;
e. Respondent failed to immerse all
implements which come in contact with blood
or bodily fluids in an EPA registered
tuberculocidal;
f. Respondent failed to store clean
implements separately from unsanitized
items.
7. The Inspector also observed Johny Jean performing a
haircut. At no time material to this complaint was Johny Jean
licensed as a cosmetologist within the State of Florida.
8. The Inspector made a return visit to Respondent salon
on September 16, 2011.
9. Inspector observed Euri Jenkins performing cosmetology
services.
10. At not time material to this complaint was Euri
Jenkins licensed as a cosmetologist within the State of Florida.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
COUNT ONE
11. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference the
allegations set forth in paragraphs one (1) through thirteen
(13) as though fully set forth herein.
12. Rule 61G5-20.004 (2), Florida Administrative Code,
provides that all holders of a cosmetology or specialty salon
license shall require and ensure that all individuals engaged in
the practice of cosmetology display at the individual’s work
station their current license or registration at all times.
13. Rule 61G5-20.002(1) (c) (1), Florida Administrative
Code, provides that “{hlair must be deposited in a closed
container.”
14. Rule 61G5-20.002 (2) (d) (1), Florida Administrative
Code, provides that a wet sanitizer with cover must be provided.
15. Rule 61G5-20.002 (d) (2) (a-d), Florida Administrative
Code, provides that all implements must be sanitized by
immersion in a hospital level or EPA disinfectant.
16. Rule 61G5-20.004 (2) (d) (3), Florida Administrative
Code, provides that all implements coming in contact with blood
or bodily fluids must be immersed in a hospital level or EPA
approved disinfectant.
17. Rule 61G65-20.002(2)(e), Florida Administrative Code,
provides that all clean implements must be stored in a closed
cabinet or container away from unsanitized instruments.
18. Based on the facts set forth above, Respondent
violated or refused to comply with a rule of the board of the
department in one or more of the following ways:
a. By failing to ensure all
individuals displayed a current, laminated
license;
b. By failing to remove hair from the
floor and store it in a closed container;
c. By failing to maintain a wet
sanitizer with a cover;
d. By failing to utilize hospital
quality/EPA approved disinfecting methods;
e. By failing to immerse all
implements which come in contact with blood
or bodily fluids in an EPA’ registered
tuberculocidal;
f. By failing to store clean
implements separately from unsanitized
items;
19. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section
477,.029(1) (i) Florida Statutes (2010), by violating or refusing
to comply with any provision of this chapter or chapter 455 or a
rule or final order of the board of the department.
COUNT TWO
20. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference the
allegations set forth in paragraphs one (1) through thirteen
(13) as though fully set forth herein.
21. Section 477.0265(1) (b) (2), Florida Statutes (2010),
provides that “[ilt is unlawful for any person to...[o]wn,
operate, maintain, open, establish, conduct, or have charge of,
either alone or with another person or persons, a cosmetology
salon...[i]n which a person not licensed as a cosmetologist is
permitted to perform services.”
22. Respondent operated as a cosmetology salon in which
Johny Jean and = Euri Jenkins were permitted to perform
cosmetology services.
25. Based on the facts set forth above, Respondent
violated Section 477.0265(1) (b) (2), Florida Statutes (2010), by
operating a cosmetology salon in which unlicensed persons were
permitted to perform cosmetology services.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board
of Cosmetology enter an order imposing one or more of the
following penalties: permanent revocation or suspension of
Respondent’s license, restriction of practice, imposition of an
administrative fine, issuance of a reprimand, placement of
Respondent on probation, assessment of costs, corrective action
and/or any other relief that the Board deems appropriate.
Signed this 9th day of January 9, 2013.
KEN LAWSON, Secretary
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
By: Roger R, Maas
Roger R. Maas
Assistant General Counsel
Florida Bar No. 128296
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
Office of the General Counsel
1940 N. Monroe St.,
Tallahassee,
(850)
(850)
Ste. 42
FL 32399-2202
717-1210 Telephone
414-8241 Facsimile
PC Found:03/07/12
PC By: Dustin William Metz
RRM/KAP
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Please be advised that mediation under section 120.573, Florida
Statutes, is not available for administrative disputes involving this
type of agency action.
Please be advised that Respondent has the right to request a
hearing to be conducted in accordance with sections 120.569 and
120.57, Florida Statutes, to be represented by counsel or other
qualified representative, to present evidence and argument, to call
and cross-examine witnesses and to have subpoenas and subpoenas duces
tecum issued on his or her behalf if a hearing is requested. Any
request for an administrative proceeding to challenge or contest the
charges contained in the administrative complaint must conform to Rule
28-106.2015, Florida Administrative Code. Rule 28-106.111, Florida
Administrative Code, provides in part that if Respondent fails to
request a hearing within 21 days of receipt of an agency pleading,
Respondent waives the right to request a hearing on the facts alleged.
NOTICE REGARDING ASSESSMENT OF COSTS
Respondent is placed on notice that Petitioner has incurred costs
related to the investigation and prosecution of this matter. Pursuant
to section 455.227(3) (a), Florida Statutes, the Board, or the
Department when there is no Board, may assess costs related to the
investigation and prosecution of the case excluding costs associated
with an attorney's time, against Respondent in addition to any other
discipline imposed.
Docket for Case No: 13-001156
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
May 29, 2013 |
Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
|
May 21, 2013 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Apr. 24, 2013 |
Notice of Service of Petitioner's First Request for Admissions filed.
|
Apr. 23, 2013 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Apr. 23, 2013 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for June 17, 2013; 9:00 a.m.; West Palm Beach and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Apr. 05, 2013 |
Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Mar. 29, 2013 |
Initial Order.
|
Mar. 28, 2013 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Mar. 28, 2013 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Mar. 28, 2013 |
Agency referral filed.
|