Petitioner: AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
Respondent: V-AGAPE, LLC, D/B/A TRACY COURT GROUP HOME
Judges: ROBERT S. COHEN
Agency: Agency for Persons with Disabilities
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Jan. 05, 2015
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, November 6, 2015.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
Summary: The agency proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent's multiple violations of the law support a denial of the renewal of its license to operate a group home.
STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
AGENCY FOR PERSONS
WITH DISABILITIES,
Petitioner,
Vv. License Number: 5444-6-GC
V-Agape, LLC.,
Tracy Court Group Home,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
The AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, (“Petitioner,” “Agency”, or
“APD”), issues this Administrative Complaint against Tracy Court Group Home,
owned and operated by V-Agape, LLC, (“Respondent”), and states the following
as the basis for this complaint:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the licensing and
operation of foster care facilities, group home facilities, and residential
habilitation centers, pursuant to Section 20.197 and Chapter 393, Florida
Statutes.
2; At all times material to this complaint, Respondent has held foster or
group home facility licenses issued by the Agency. The current group
home license was issued for the following address: 19103 Tracy Court,
Lutz, Florida 33548. V-Agape, LLC, is owned by Tonya Nelson, who is
the sole managing member. The Respondent also has contracted with
APD to provide the residents with Medicaid Waiver developmental
disability services.
3. Section 393.0673(2)(b), Florida Statutes, states that the Agency may deny
an application for licensure if “[t]he Department of Children and Family
Services has verified that the applicant is responsible for the abuse, neglect,
or abandonment of a child or the abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a
vulnerable adult.”
4. Section 393.0673(2)(a)3, Florida Statutes, states that the Agency may
deny an application for licensure if the applicant has “[flailed to comply
with the applicable requirements of this chapter or rules applicable to the
applicant.”
5) Section 393.13(3)(a), Florida Statutes, states “[pJersons with developmental
disabilities shall have a right to dignity, privacy, and humane care, including
the right to be free from abuse, including sexual abuse, neglect, and
exploitation.”
6. Section 393.13(3)(g), Florida Statutes, states “[p]ersons with
developmental disabilities shall have a right to be free from harm,
including unnecessary physical, chemical, or mechanical restraint,
isolation, excessive medication, abuse, or neglect.”
re Rule 65G-2.012(5)(c), F.A.C., requires that “[s]taff shall be of suitable
physical and mental ability to care for the clients they propose to serve;
have knowledge of the needs of the clients; be capable of handling an
emergency situation promptly and intelligently; and be willing to cooperate
with the supervisory staff.”
8. Page A-8 of the Developmental Disabilities Waiver Services Coverage
and Limitations Handbook, incorporated into rule through Rule 59G-
13.083(2), Florida Administrative Code, requires that each provider of
waiver services must agree "to safeguard the health, safety, and well-
being of all recipients receiving services from the provider."
9. Rule 65G-2.012(4), F.A.C. requires the following:
Group home facility services shall include, but not be limited to,
provision of adequate living accommodations, proper and adequate
dietary supervision, appropriate physical care, support, guidance,
supervision and assistance with training required to assure each
individual the opportunity for personal growth and development.
Specific services to be provided shall be defined by the needs of
the clients to be served. Consideration shall be given to age, sex,
developmental level and specific needs.
10. Rule 65G-7.005(2), F.A.C., requires the following:
“A validated medication assistance provider must comply with the
following requirements: (e) Limit administration, or assistance with
self-administration, to medications prescribed in writing by the
client’s health care practitioner and properly labeled and dispensed
in accordance with Chapters 465 and 499, F.S.; (f) Immediately
report torn, damaged, illegible, or mislabeled prescription labels to
the dispensing pharmacist; (h) Verify that the correct medication is
administered to the correct client, at the correct time, with the correct
12.
13.
15.
16.
dosage, by the correct route, and for the correct reason, as
prescribed by the health care practitioner; (i) Observe complete
ingestion of oral medication before leaving the client and before
recording or documenting the administration of the medication on the
MAR; (j) Record the date, time, dosage, and name of each
medication in the MAR immediately following administration and sign
the entries health care practitioner and, if a client is residing in a
residential facility, notify the facility supervisor.”
Rule 65G-7.009(1), F.A.C., requires the following:
“If a client will be away from a licensed residential facility or
supported living home and requires during that time administration
of medication by persons other than the medication assistance
provider, the medication assistance provider must comply with the
following requirements to assure that the client has appropriate
medications during his or her absence: Perform a count of the
medication amounts provided to the client for administration during
the absence and a second count of the medication amounts received
upon the client's return; Record both medication counts in an “Off-
site Medication Form,” APD Form 65G7-08.”
Rule 65G-7.002(3), F.A.C., requires that “[t]he medication assistance
provider must maintain a current Authorization form, reviewed by the client’s
physician, physician assistant, or ARNP at least annually and upon any
change to the client's medical condition or self-sufficiency which would
affect the client's ability to self-administer medication or to tolerate particular
administration routes.”
Rule 65G-7.002(5), F.A.C., requires that “[i]n addition to an executed
Authorization for Medication Administration and before providing a client
with medication assistance, a provider must also obtain from the client or
the client's authorized representative an “Informed Consent for Medication
Administration” APD Form 65G7-02.”
Rule 65G-2.011(3), F.A.C., requires that “[t]he facility shall establish and
maintain on the premises an individual record for each client. The record
shall be kept in a lockable container and include at least: An accounting of
the client’s funds received and/or distributed by the vendor.”
Rule 65G-2.011(8), F.A.C., requires the following: “[vJolatile materials shall
be isolated from the client’s living area. Such items shall be stored in
approved metal containers. All doors with locks must be readily opened
from the inside.”
Rule 65G-2.011(9), F.A.C., requires that “[tlemperature and humidity shall
be maintained within a normal comfort range for the climate.”
17. Rule 65G-2.012(8), F.A.C., requires that “[t]he facility shall maintain the
interior and exterior of the building in a clean, safe, presentable and repaired
condition.”
18. Rule 65G-2.006(4), F.A.C., requires that “[i]f an operator wishes to increase
the capacity of his/her facility, he/she shall notify the Area Administrator or
his/her designee in writing 30 days prior to the proposed change. The facility
shall be resurveyed and a new license may be issued setting forth the new
maximum capacity.”
19. Rule 65G-2.012(19), F.A.C., requires the following:
“A group home facility serving clients shall not provide residential
services to any private client whose physical or mental condition
might adversely affect the welfare and development of Agency
clients accepted by the facility. The group home shall have prior
approval of area office staff of its intent to accept other than Agency
clients. Area office staff shall give prior approval for any admissions
which vary from criteria included in the application for licensure as a
residential facility.”
20. Rule 65G-2.012(5), F.A.C., requires the following:
“Staff identified in the application for licensure and providing direct
care services must be at least eighteen years of age. Written
evidence of the qualifications of the direct care staff shall be
maintained. Minimum criteria shall be demonstrated ability to meet
the written established job description, appropriate life experience,
and eighth grade education. Staff shall be of suitable physical and
mental ability to care for the clients they propose to serve; have
knowledge of the needs of the clients; be capable of handling an
emergency situation promptly and intelligently; and be willing to
cooperate with the supervisory staff. At least three written character
references (excluding relatives) and an employment work history
shall be required for direct care staff.”
21. Rule 65G-2.009(3), F.A.C., requires the following:
“The licensee shall ensure that the placement of new residents within
the facility does not adversely affect the health, safety, or welfare of
existing facility residents. The licensee must obtain the Agency's
approval prior to any proposed placement that would deviate from
the criteria specified on the facility's application for licensure. The
licensee shall notify the Agency and provide descriptive information
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
on the prospective resident if the proposed placement involves an
individual who is not a client of the Agency.”
Count |
On or about December 28, 2012, Myra Leitold, APD residential licensing
supervisor, conducted a visit to the foster home. The following violations
were observed: a door lock to the office and bedroom was keyed so that it
could not be readily opened from the inside; the accounting of Resident
1.’s finances was not current; there was no prescription found for one of
Resident 1’s medications; one of Resident 1’s medication labels had
incorrect instructions on it; the heat was not on and the temperature of the
home was below 65 degrees.
The aforementioned incident constitutes violations of Rule 65G-2.011(3),
F.A.C., Rule 65G-2.011(8), F.A.C., Rule 65G-2.011(9), F.A.C., and Rule
65G-7.005(2), F.A.C.
Count II
On or about January 11, 2013, Ms. Nelson exceeded the maximum
licensed capacity of three in her foster home when she accepted a fourth
resident in the home. She did not have approval from APD to exceed her
licensed capacity by accepting another placement.
The aforementioned incident constitutes violations of Rule 65G-2.006(4),
F.A.C.
Count III
On or about January 17, 2013, a visit to the foster home was conducted
by Myra Leitold, APD residential licensing supervisor. The following
violations were observed: volatile materials were not stored in approved
metal containers; three prescriptions for Resident 2’s medications were
not present.
The aforementioned incident constitutes violations of Rule 65G-2.011(8),
F.A.C., and Rule 65G-7.005(2), F.A.C.
Count IV
On or about May 30, 2013, APD representative Mitchell Turner conducted
a visit to the group home and observed that the instructions on the
medication administration record for Resident 1 did not match the
prescribed doses and frequency on the written physician’s orders for the
medications.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
The aforementioned incident constitutes a violation of Rule 65g-7.005(2),
F.A.C.
Count V
On or about June 18, 2013, APD representative Mitchell Turner conducted
a visit to the group home and observed the following violations: water
stains on the ceiling and wall; stains on the baseboard and wall that
appeared to be mold; the medication dose documented as administered to
Resident 3 did not match the dose on the written physician’s order.
The aforementioned incident constitutes violations of Rule 65G-7.005(2),
F.A.C., and Rule 65G-2.012(8), F.A.C.
Count VI
On or about September 25, 2013, APD representative Mitchell Turner
conducted a visit to the group home and observed that Ms. Nelson had
accepted another resident for placement in the group home without
notifying APD or obtaining approval from APD prior to acceptance.
The aforementioned incident constitutes a violation of Rule 65G-
2.012(19), F.A.C.
Count VII
On or about January 24, 2014, it was alleged that Resident 2, a minor
female resident of the Respondent's Tracy Court Group Home, sustained
bruising and a red mark on the back of her hand from being struck on her
hands by Tonya Nelson. Resident 2 is non-verbal and intellectually
disabled.
The subsequent investigation by Department of Children and Families was
ultimately closed with verified indicators for physical injury upon Resident
2 but did not identify the caregiver responsible.
The Respondent's failure to provide appropriate supervision, safeguard
the health, safety, and well-being of the residents, and provide an
environment free from abuse and neglect constitutes a violation of Section
393.13(3)(a), F.S., 393.13(3)(g), F.S., Rule 65G-2.012(5)(c), F.A.C., Rule
65G-2.012(4), F.A.C., and Page A-8 of the Developmental Disabilities
Waiver Services Coverage and Limitations Handbook, incorporated into
rule through Rule 59G-13.083(2), F.A.C.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
Count Vill
On or about April 9, 2014, APD representative Mitchell Turner conducted
a visit to the group home and observed the following violations: the
authorization for medication administration from Resident 1’s physician
had 2xpired; Resident 1’s informed consent for medication administration
was incomplete; the medication administration record did not indicate the
strength of medication that was being administered to Resident 1.
The aforementioned incident constitutes violations of Rule 65G-7.002(3)
and (5), F.A.C., and Rule 65G-7.005(2), F.A.C.,
Count IX
On or about May 20, 2014, the Department of Children and Families
commenced an investigation into unexplained bruises observed on
Resident 2, a vulnerable minor female and resident of the Respondent’s
Tracy Court Group Home. Resident 2 had a large bruise on her left thigh
and a bruise on her left arm. Ms. Nelson was not able to explain how
Resident 2 sustained the bruises on her thigh and arm.
The Department of Children and Families ultimately closed the
investigation with verified findings of threatened harm against Tonya
Nelson. Resident 2 was moved from the Respondent's group home after
this incident.
The Respondent's failure to provide appropriate supervision, safeguard
the health, safety, and well-being of the residents, and provide an
environment free from abuse and neglect constitutes a violation of Section
393.13(3)(a), F.S., 393.13(3)(g), F.S., Rule 65G-2.012(5)(c), F.A.C., Rule
65G-2.012(4), F.A.C., and Page A-8 of the Developmental Disabilities
Waiver Services Coverage and Limitations Handbook, incorporated into
rule through Rule 59G-13.083(2), F.A.C.
Count X
On or about June 26, 2014, APD representative Mitchell Turner conducted
a visit to the group home and observed the following violations: the
personnel file for direct care staff Genora Walker did not contain a job
description or three character references. The personnel file for direct
care staff Shawn Davis was missing three character references,
employment history, or evidence of experience related to his qualifications
for the job.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
The aforementioned incident constitutes violations of Rule 65G-2.012(5),
F.A.C.
Count XI
On or about August 14, 2014, APD representative Mitchell Turner
conducted a visit to the group home and observed the following violation:
Resident 1 was being administered her medications at lower doses than
what was prescribed by her physician.
The aforementioned incident constitutes a violation of Rule 65G-7.005(2),
F.A.C.
Count XII
On or about November 4, 2014, Ms. Tonya Nelson sent an email to APD
employee Meisha Stewart, the residential planning coordinator for the
Suncoast Region, to advise that she intended to accept a non-APD client
for placement in the Tracy Court Group Home. Ms. Stewart responded to
Ms. Nelson on November 4, 2014, that pursuant to Rule 65G-2.009(3),
F.A.C., descriptive information about the prospective resident must be
submitted to APD for review and approval prior to accepting an individual
who is not a client of the Agency.
Ms. Nelson did not submit the requested documentation to Ms. Stewart.
On November 11, 2014, Ms. Nelson sent an email to Meisha Stewart to
advise that she had allowed Resident 4, a minor child under the
supervision of Camelot Community Care who is not a client of the Agency,
to move into the Tracy Court Group Home on November 10, 2014.
On November 13, 2014, Ms. Nelson forwarded a copy of the court order
placing Resident 4 in her custody on November 10, 2014, to Meisha
Stewart.
The aforementioned incident constitutes a violation of Rule 65G-2.009(3),
F.A.C.
WHEREFORE, based on the aforementioned violations of rules and laws
applicable to the licensee as described above, and pursuant to s.
393.0673(2)(a)3, Florida Statutes, the application for licensure renewal sought for
the group home facility license held by Tracy Court Group Home, owned and
operated by V-Agape, LLC, is denied.
Dated:
December 4, 2014
MU cael
urt Ahrendt
Senior Attorney, Office of General Counsel
Agency for Persons with Disabilities
4030 Esplanade Way, Suite 380
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950
Attachments:
Explanation of Rights
Election of Rights Form
Tonya Nelson, Owner Lindsey West, Esq.
V-Agape, LLC The Plante Law Group, PLC
15822 Spring Crest Cir. 806 North Armenia Ave.
Tampa, Fl 33624 Tampa, Fl 33609
Jeffrey Smith,
APD Suncoast Region Manager
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
| HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the above named individuals by U.S. Mail,
facsimile, or electronic mail, this 4th day of December, 2014.
David De La Paz, ney Clerk
Agency for Persons with Disabilities
4030 Esplanade Way, Suite 380
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
ELECTION OF RIGHTS
RESPONDENT: _V-Agape, LLC.,Tracy Court Group Home,
| have read the accompanying Notice of License Denial and Explanation of
Rights in this matter, and | elect the following hearing option:
CL dispute the material facts alleged in the Notice of License Denial and
request that a formal evidentiary hearing be held before an Administrative Law
Judge at the Division of Administrative Hearings, pursuant to Section 120.57(1),
Florida Statutes. Specifically, | dispute the following material facts (attach
additional sheets if necessary):
| do not dispute the facts alleged in the Notice of License Denial but wish
to be heard in an informal hearing, held pursuant to Section 120.57(2), Florida
Statutes. | understand that at that hearing | will be permitted to submit written or
oral evidence to explain why the facts do not warrant denial of licensure.
Please be advised this is a legally binding document and contains important
information regarding your rights. Should you desire advice regarding your
response, you may wish to seek legal counsel before proceeding. By signing this
document, you represent you are authorized to act on behalf of the establishment
named herein. Failure to complete, sign and return the election of rights
form to the agency within 21 days of receipt will constitute a waiver of your
right to be heard in this matter.
Election of Rights page 1
10
Please fill out completely:
Telephone number for contact:
Signature:
Print Name:
Business Location Address:
City
Mailing Address
City
Electronic Mail for contact
Fax
Date:
Title:
State Zip
State Zip
MAIL OR FAX BOTH PAGES OF THE COMPLETED FORM TO:
David De La Paz, Esq., Agency Clerk
Agency for Persons with Disabilities,
4030 Esplanade Way, Suite 380
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950
Fax: (850) 414-5759
You are advised, per Section 120.573, Florida Statutes, that mediation is not
available for this action. Please keep a copy of this document for your records.
11
Election of Rights page 2
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
EXPLANATION OF RIGHTS
The enclosed Administrative Complaint charges you with violating one or more
provisions of Chapter 393, Florida Statutes, or the rules supplementing that
Chapter. If you have questions regarding your response or best course of action,
you may wish to seek the advice of competent legal counsel.
Your receipt of this Administrative Complaint packet constitutes service upon you.
Your rights under Florida law (Chapter 120, Florida Statutes) are as follows:
You may elect to not dispute the violations alleged in the Complaint and request
that a hearing be held to present testimony or documents you wish the Agency to
consider in mitigation of the alleged violations prior to disposition of this case. Any
penalty levied will be included in a Final Order. If a dispute of material fact arises,
the hearing will be terminated and the case referred to the Division of
Administrative Hearings.
You may elect to dispute the violations alleged in the Complaint and request a
hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, which is an administrative “trial”. You
and the Agency may present evidence and witnesses to prove or disprove the facts
alleged and submit a written proposed recommended order after the hearing for
the Judge’s consideration. Based on the evidence and any proposed
recommended orders submitted, the Judge will issue a Recommended Order
containing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommended Penalty, if
any. Following review of the Recommended Order, the Agency will issue a Final
Order.
An Election of Rights form is included with the Administrative Complaint. The
Agency must receive it within 21 days of your receipt of this Administrative
Complaint packet. After the Agency determines whether a dispute of material fact
exists, it will make arrangements on your behalf for the appropriate hearing. You
will receive notice of the date, time, and place of hearing at the address designated
by you on your Election of Rights.
IMPORTANT: If the Agency does not receive a completed copy of the
Election of Rights form, or any other written response from you, within the
21 days of your receipt of this Administrative Complaint, you may have
waived your right to a hearing in this matter and the Agency may proceed
against you in this matter without your participation.
Please note, per Chapter 120.573, Florida Statutes, mediation is not available in
this action.
12
Docket for Case No: 15-000034FL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Dec. 02, 2015 |
Agency Final Order filed.
|
Nov. 06, 2015 |
Recommended Order (hearing held July 23, 2015). CASE CLOSED.
|
Nov. 06, 2015 |
Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
|
Aug. 25, 2015 |
Order Granting Extension of Time.
|
Aug. 24, 2015 |
(Respondent's Proposed) Recommended Order filed.
|
Aug. 24, 2015 |
Agency's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
|
Aug. 18, 2015 |
(Petitioner's) Request to File Proposed Recommended Orders filed.
|
Aug. 05, 2015 |
Transcript of Proceedings (not available for viewing) filed. |
Jul. 23, 2015 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Held. |
Jul. 22, 2015 |
Respondent's Request for Judicial Notice filed.
|
Jul. 22, 2015 |
Subpoena Ad Testificandum filed.
|
Jul. 22, 2015 |
Return of Service filed.
|
Jul. 21, 2015 |
Notice of Filing Petitioner's Replacement Exhibit #1 filed.
|
Jul. 21, 2015 |
Notice of Appearance (Gerald D. Siebens) filed.
|
Jul. 16, 2015 |
Petitioner's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing). |
Jul. 16, 2015 |
Notice of Filing Respondents Proposed Exhibits filed.
|
Jul. 16, 2015 |
Notice of Filing Petitioner's (Proposed) Exhibits filed.
|
Jul. 14, 2015 |
Respondent's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing). |
Jul. 13, 2015 |
(Joint) Pre-hearing Stipulation filed.
|
Jul. 13, 2015 |
Respondent's (Proposed) Exhibit & Witness List filed.
|
May 21, 2015 |
Notice of Service of Reponses to Petitioner?s First Request for Admission to Respondent filed.
|
May 11, 2015 |
Order Granting Extension of Time.
|
May 01, 2015 |
Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time filed.
|
Apr. 24, 2015 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for July 23, 2015; 9:00 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
|
Apr. 16, 2015 |
Joint Motion to Contiue and Reschedule Final Hearing and Joint Notice of Availability for Continued Final Hearing Date filed.
|
Mar. 17, 2015 |
Subpoena Ad Testificandum (Myra Lietold) filed.
|
Mar. 17, 2015 |
Subpoena Ad Testificandum (Mitchell Turner) filed.
|
Mar. 13, 2015 |
(Respondent's) Request for Production filed.
|
Mar. 04, 2015 |
Order Granting Motion and Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for April 29, 2015; 9:00 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
|
Feb. 20, 2015 |
Joint Motion to Extend Deadline to Hold Final Hearing, Joint Notice of Estimated Length of Time Necessary to Conduct the Final Hearing, and Suggested Geographic Location for Final Hearing filed.
|
Feb. 18, 2015 |
Order Requiring Dates for Re-scheduling the Final Hearing.
|
Feb. 16, 2015 |
Joint Motion for Scheduling Conference or in the Alternative to Issue an Initial Order filed.
|
Feb. 02, 2015 |
Notice of Transfer.
|
Jan. 30, 2015 |
Order Granting Motion for Disqualification.
|
Jan. 29, 2015 |
Respondent's Verified Motion for Disqualification filed.
|
Jan. 27, 2015 |
Notice of Appearance (Lindsey West) filed.
|
Jan. 27, 2015 |
Notice of Appearance (David Plante) filed.
|
Jan. 22, 2015 |
Order Denying Motion for Disqualification.
|
Jan. 22, 2015 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Jan. 22, 2015 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for March 9, 2015; 9:00 a.m.; Tampa and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Jan. 12, 2015 |
Agency's Motion for Disqualification filed.
|
Jan. 06, 2015 |
Initial Order.
|
Jan. 05, 2015 |
Addendum to Election of Rights Form filed.
|
Jan. 05, 2015 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Jan. 05, 2015 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jan. 05, 2015 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|
Orders for Case No: 15-000034FL
Issue Date |
Document |
Summary |
Dec. 02, 2015 |
Agency Final Order
|
|
Nov. 06, 2015 |
Recommended Order
|
The agency proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent's multiple violations of the law support a denial of the renewal of its license to operate a group home.
|