Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF DRUGS, DEVICES, AND COSMETICS
Respondent: SALOMON MELGEN, M.D.
Judges: F. SCOTT BOYD
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: West Palm Beach, Florida
Filed: Aug. 20, 2015
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, March 8, 2016.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
FILED
Department of Business and Professional feguiation
Deputy Agency Clerk
STATE OF FLORIDA CLERK vette Lawveon-Proctor
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATIG pxe 7/20/2015
File?
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS &
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
DIVISION OF DRUGS, DEVICES,
AND COSMETICS
Petitioner,
v. CASE NO.: 2014-002081
SALOMON MELGEN, M.D.
Respondent.
I
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW, Petitioner, Department of Business & Professional Regulation,
Division of Drugs, Devices, and Cosmetics, ("Petitioner’ or “Department’), and files this
Administrative Complaint against Respondent, Salomon Melgen, M.D. (“Respondent”),
and in support thereof alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state department charged with regulating Drugs, Devices,
and Cosmetics pursuant to Section 20.165 and Chapter 499, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent is a licensed medical doctor, having been issued license
number ME 48581 by the Department of Health on or about June 26, 1986.
Respondent's address of record is 2521 Metrocentre Bivd., West Palm Beach, FL
33407.
3. Petitioner is authorized by Section 499.051(2) to enter any establishment
for the purpose of establishing compliance with Chapter 499, Florida Statutes, and the
tules adopted under that statute, regarding any drug, device, or cosmetic.
4. On or about January 16, 2014, Department Inspectors began an
inspection at the above address after receiving a report of an adverse incident from the
Department of Health.
5. The inspection was conducted on or about January 16, 2014 through June
3, 2014.
6. Inspectors obtained records that showed that the Respondent purchased
Avastin and Lucentis and had the drugs shipped to Eastern Pharmacy, 2046 West
Silver Springs Boulevard, Ocala, Florida 34475 (Eastern) for repackaging into single
dose syringes.
7. Eastern holds no permits with the Department. Eastern holds permit
number PH26673 with the Department of Health.
8. Avastin, (generic name bevacizumub), manufactured by Genentech, is an
injectable prescription drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) to
treat cancer. Avastin is commonly used to treat wet age-related macular degeneration,
a disease of the eye that can lead to vision loss.
9. Avastin is manufactured in 100mg (4mL) or 400mg (16mL) vials with no
preservatives. The labeling includes the words, “single use vial” and a directive to
discard any unused portion. The manufactured drug includes an instruction insert with
instructions for use.
10. For treatment of macular degeneration, only a small amount of the
medication, usually 1.25 to 2.5 milligrams, is needed. Typically, one 100mg vial of
Avastin can produce 80 single-dose syringes and one 400mg vial of Avastin can
produce 300 single-dose syringes.
11. In or about 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an alert
to health care professionals which stated, in relevant part:
Health care professionals should be aware that repackaging sterile drugs
without proper aseptic technique can compromise product sterility,
potentially putting the patient at risk for microbial infections. Health care
professionals should ensure that drug products are obtained from
appropriate, reliable sources and properly administered.
12. Lucentis (generic name ranibizumab), is a prescription drug approved by
the FDA to treat wet age-related macular degeneration. Lucentis is manufactured and
distributed in glass vials containing a single dose (0.5mL) for injecting into one eye for
treatment of macular degeneration.
13. The label for Lucentis includes a directive to store the drug in the original
carton until time of use. Lucentis was manufactured with an insert with instructions for
use.
14. Between July and December 2013, Respondent purchased Avastin and
Lucentis from Besse medical and Genentech and had the drugs delivered to Eastern to
be repackaged. Once repackaged, Eastern delivered the drugs to Respondent.
16. Respondent paid Eastern to repackage Avastin from single use vials into
single dose syringes and to ship the syringes to Respondent.
17. Respondent paid Eastern to repackage Lucentis from single dose vials
into single dose syringes and to ship the syringes to Respondent.
18. “Repackage” and “repackager” are defined in Sections 499.003(48) and
(49), Florida Statutes (2012-2013), as:
499.003 Definitions.--
* * *
(48) “Repackage” includes repacking or otherwise changing the
container, wrapper, or labeling to further the distribution of the drug,
device, or cosmetic.
(49) “Repackager” means a person who repackages. The term excludes
pharmacies that are operating in compliance with pharmacy practice
standards as defined in chapter 465 and rules adopted under that chapter.
19. Section 499.006(10), Florida Statutes (2012-2013), provides:
499.006 Adulterated drug or device—A drug or device is
adulterated:
* * *
(10) If it is a prescription drug for which the required pedigree paper is
nonexistent, fraudulent, or incomplete under the requirements of this part
or applicable rules, or that has been purchased, held, sold, or distributed
at any time by a person not authorized under federal or state law to do so;
or
* * *
(Emphasis Added).
20. Section 499.01(1)(b) and (2)(b), Florida Statutes (2012-2013),
provides:
499.01 Permits.—
(1) Prior to operating, a permit is required for each person and
establishment that intends to operate as:
* * *
(b) A prescription drug repackager;
* * *
(2) The following permits are established:
* * *
(b) Prescription drug repackager permit—A prescription drug
repackager permit is required for any person that repackages a
prescription drug in this state.
1. A person that operates an establishment permitted as a prescription
drug repackager may engage in wholesale distribution of prescription
drugs repackaged at that establishment and must comply with all the
provisions of this part and the rules adopted under this part that apply to a
wholesale distributor.
2. Aprescription drug repackager must comply with all appropriate state
and federal good manufacturing practices.
21. Eastern does not add any medications or substances to the Avastin when
it removes the drugs from the single use vials and repackages the drugs into single
dose syringes.
22. Eastern does not add any medications or substances to the Lucentis when
it removes the drugs from the single dose vials and repackages the drugs into single
dose syringes.
23. Eastern was not authorized to repackage Avastin and was not authorized
to distribute the repackaged Avastin to Respondent.
24. Eastern was not authorized to repackage Lucentis and was not authorized
to distribute the repackaged Lucentis to Respondent.
25. Respondent did not obtain the records required by Rule 61N-1.012,
Florida Administrative Code, from Eastern when Respondent received the repackaged
Avastin from Eastern.
26. Respondent did not obtain the records required by Rule 61N-1.012,
Florida Administrative Code, from Eastern when Respondent received the repackaged
Lucentis from Eastern.
27. When Respondent received the repackaged drugs from Eastern, there
was no labeling on the drugs. The individual syringes were packed inside individual
plastic covers and several covered syringes were packed into a clear plastic bag
labeled only as “Avastin “ or “Lucentis.”
28. Bags containing several single dose syringes labeled as “Avastin” or
“Lucentis” were not labeled with the name and place of business of the manufacturer.
29. Bags containing several single dose syringes labeled as “Avastin” or
“Lucentis” were not labeled with the quantity of drug ingredient per unit.
30. Bags containing several single dose syringes labeled as “Avastin” or
“Lucentis” were not labeled with adequate directions for use.
31. Bags containing several single dose syringes labeled as “Avastin” or
“Lucentis” were not labeled with the “Rx only” statement or other verbiage to identify the
contents as prescription drugs.
32. Bags containing several single dose syringes labeled as “Avastin” or
“Lucentis” were not labeled with Lot numbers.
33. Bags containing several single dose syringes labeled as “Avastin” or
“Lucentis” were not labeled with expiration dates.
34. Bags containing several single dose syringes labeled as “Avastin” or
“Lucentis” were not labeled with a barcode.
35. Section 499.006(10), Florida Statutes (2013), provides that a prescription
drug is adulterated if it has been purchased, held, sold, or distributed at any time by a
person not authorized under federal or state law to do so.
36. Rule 61N-1.012, Florida Administrative Code, provides:
61N-1.012 Records of Drugs, Cosmetics and Devices.
(1)(a) Records to document the movement of drugs, devices or cosmetics
must provide a complete audit trail from a person’s receipt or acquisition to
sale or other disposition of the product or component. A complete audit
trail includes_records which document each transaction or step in the
receipt, manufacture, shipping, transfer, or other steps in the channel of
trade of that person, whether or not physical possession or handling of the
product_or component occurs. At a minimum, records shall consist_of
invoices from the supplier or source which documents acquisition of each
product by the person and invoices of sale or other transfer by the person
to the recipient. Retail sales transactions to the consumer of over-the-
counter drugs, non-restricted devices, or cosmetics are exempt from the
requirements of this rule. Additional recordkeeping is required for persons
permitted by the department as further stated in this rule.
(b) A person engaged in the distribution of drugs, devices, or
cosmetics is not required to maintain documentation from a common
carrier that the designated recipient received the product shipped;
however, the person must obtain such documentation from the common
carrier and make it available to the department upon specific request of
the department.
(2) Any person engaged in the manufacture of prescription drugs, the
wholesale distribution of prescription drugs, or otherwise receiving or
distributing prescription drugs must maintain records as follows:
a) For each step in the channel of trade, records containing the
information required by Section 499.0121(6)(a), F.S., and the Florida
permit or license number which authorizes the source to possess and
transfer prescription drugs in or into Florida must _appear_on one
document. If delivery of prescription drugs is made to a person other than
the purchaser, the name, address or location where the prescription drugs
are delivered, and the state license, permit or registration number for that
location must be included also.
(b) The state permit or registration number of the purchaser may be
omitted if the prescription drugs are exported; but a validated airway bill,
bill of lading or other appropriate documentation must_be maintained to
evidence the exportation of the product.
(c)_ Invoices _must_reflect_the_amount_billed_per_ prescription drug
product.
(d) Records to document the distribution of prescription drugs required
by Section 499.0121(6), F.S., and this rule are to be created during the
transaction (i.e., at the time of order, receipt, processing, picking or
shipping) and not retroactively created. A pharmacy or other person
authorized to possess prescription drugs that transfers prescription drugs
to an establishment performing reverse distribution services or destruction
activities must prepare or have prepared an inventory or other record of
the prescription drugs so transferred prior to the prescription drugs leaving
the premises. In addition to the name, address, and license number of the
sender and the name, address, and license number of the receiving
establishment, the record must include the elements set forth in paragraph
61N-1.023(3)(a), F.A.C. [Emphasis Added]
37. Section 499.007, Florida Statutes, provides:
499.007 Misbranded drug or device.—A drug or device is misbranded:
(1) If its labeling is in any way false or misleading.
(2) If in package form, it does not bear a label containing:
(a) The name and place of business of the manufacturer, repackager, or
distributor of the finished dosage form of the drug. For the purpose of this
paragraph, the finished dosage form of a prescription drug is that form of
the drug which is, or is intended to be, dispensed or administered to the
patient and requires no further manufacturing or processing other than
packaging, reconstitution, and labeling; and
(b) An accurate statement of the quantity of the contents in terms of
weight, measure, or numerical count. However, under this section,
reasonable variations are permitted, and the department shall establish by
rule exemptions for small packages.
(3) If it is an active pharmaceutical ingredient in bulk form and does not
bear a label containing:
(a) The name and place of business of the manufacturer, repackager, or
distributor; and
(b) An accurate statement of the quantity of the contents in terms of
weight, measure, or numerical count.
(4) If any word, statement, or other information required by or under this
part to appear on the label or labeling is not prominently placed thereon
with such conspicuousness as compared with other words, statements,
designs, or devices in the labeling, and in such terms, as to render the
word, statement, or other information likely to be read and understood
under customary conditions of purchase and use.
(5) If itis a drug and is not designated solely by a name recognized in an
official compendium and its label does not bear:
(a) The common or usual name of the drug, if any; and
(b) In case it is fabricated from two or more ingredients, the common or
usual name and quantity of each active ingredient.
(6) If its labeling does not bear:
(a) Adequate directions for use; and
(6) Adequate warnings against use in those pathological conditions in
which its use may be dangerous to health or against use by children if its
use may be dangerous to health, or against unsafe dosage or methods or
duration of administration or application, in such manner and form as are
necessary for the protection of users.
(7) If it purports to be a drug the name of which is recognized in the
official compendium and it is not packaged and labeled as prescribed
therein. However, the method of packaging may be modified with the
consent of the department.
(8) If it has been found by the department to be a drug liable to
deterioration and it is not packaged in such form and manner
COUNT ONE
38. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs 1-37 as if fully set forth
in this count one.
39. Section 499.005(14), Florida Statutes (2012-2013), provides that the
purchase or receipt of a prescription drug from a person that is not authorized under this
chapter to distribute prescription drugs to that purchaser or recipient, is unlawful.
40. Respondent purchased repackaged prescription drug Avastin in single-
dose syringes from Eastern, when Eastern was not authorized under Chapter 499,
Florida Statutes, to repackage prescription drugs or to distribute repackaged
prescription drugs to Respondent.
41. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 499.005(14), Florida
Statutes (2012-2013), by purchasing the prescription drug Avastin in single-dose
syringes from Eastern when Eastern was not authorized under Chapter 499, Florida
Statutes, to repackage or to distribute the drugs to Respondent.
COUNT TWO
42. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs 1-37 as if fully set forth
in this count two.
43. Section 499.005(14), Florida Statutes (2012-2013), provides that the
purchase or receipt of a prescription drug from a person that is not authorized under this
chapter to distribute prescription drugs to that purchaser or recipient, is unlawful.
44 Respondent purchased repackaged prescription drug Lucentis in single
dose syringes from Eastern when Eastern was not authorized under Chapter 499,
Florida Statutes, to repackage prescription drugs or to distribute repackaged
prescription drugs to Respondent.
45. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 499.005(14), Florida
Statutes (2012-2013), by purchasing individual single-dose syringes of the prescription
drug Lucentis from Eastern when Eastern was not authorized under Chapter 499,
Florida Statutes, to repackage or to distribute the drugs to Respondent.
COUNT THREE
46. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs 1-37 as if fully set forth
in this count three.
47. The prescription drug Avastin which Respondent received from Eastern
was adulterated because Eastern had no permit to repackage or distribute the
repackaged drugs to Respondent and thus the drug had been purchased, held, sold, or
distributed at any time by a person not authorized under federal or state law to do so.
48. Section 499.005(3), Florida Statutes (2012-2013), provides that the receipt
of any drug that is adulterated or misbranded and the delivery or proffered delivery of
such drug, device, or cosmetic, is unlawful.
49. Respondent received adulterated repackaged Avastin from Eastern and
delivered the same to Respondent's patients.
50. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 499.005(3), Florida
Statutes (2012-2013), by receiving adulterated repackaged Avastin from Eastern and
delivering the same to patients.
10
COUNT FOUR
51. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs 1-37 as if fully set forth
in this count four.
52. The prescription drug Lucentis which Respondent received from Eastern
in single-dose syringes was adulterated because Eastern had no permit to repackage
drugs or distribute the repackaged drugs to Respondent and thus the drug had been
purchased, held, sold, or distributed at any time by a person not authorized under
federal or state law to do so.
53. Section 499.005(3), Florida Statutes (2012-2013), provides that the receipt
of any drug that is adulterated or misbranded and the delivery or proffered delivery of
such drug, device, or cosmetic, is unlawful.
54. Respondent received adulterated repackaged Lucentis from Eastern and
delivered the same to Respondent's patients.
55. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 499.005(3), Florida
Statutes (2012-2013), by receiving adulterated prescription drugs and delivering the
same to patients.
COUNT FIVE
56. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs 1-37 as if fully set forth
in this count five.
57. The prescription drug Avastin which Respondent received from Eastern
was misbranded because the drug lacked labeling information required by Section
499.007, Florida Statutes (2012-2013).
11
58. Section 499.005(3), Florida Statutes (2012-2013), provides that the receipt
of any drug that is adulterated or misbranded and the delivery or proffered delivery of
such drug, device, or cosmetic, is unlawful.
59. Respondent received misbranded repackaged Avastin from Eastern and
delivered the same to Respondent's patients.
60. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 499.005(3), Florida
Statutes (2012-2013), by receiving misbranded repackaged Avastin from Eastern and
delivering the same to patients.
COUNT SIX
61. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs 1-37 as if fully set forth
in this count six.
62. The prescription drug Lucentis which Respondent received from Eastern
was misbranded because the drug lacked labeling information required by Section
499.007, Florida Statutes (2012-2013).
63. Section 499.005(3), Florida Statutes (2012-2013), provides that the receipt
of any drug that is adulterated or misbranded and the delivery or proffered delivery of
such drug, device, or cosmetic, is unlawful.
64. Respondent received misbranded repackaged Lucentis from Eastern and
delivered the same to Respondent's patients.
65. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 499.005(3), Florida
Statutes (2012-2013), by receiving misbranded repackaged Lucentis from Eastern and
delivering the same to patients.
12
COUNT SEVEN
66. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs 1-37 as if fully set forth
in this count seven.
67. — Section 499.005(18), Florida Statutes, provides that the failure to maintain
records as required by Chapter 499 and rules adopted pursuant to Chapter 499, is
unlawful.
68. Respondent received repackaged Avastin from Eastern without the
documentation required by Rule 61N-1.012, Florida Administrative Code.
69. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 499.005(18), Florida
Statutes (2012-2013), by failing to maintain records as required by Rule 61N-1.012,
Florida Administrative Code
COUNT EIGHT
70. Petitioner re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs 1-37 as if fully set forth
in this count eight.
71. Section 499.005(8), Florida Statutes (2012-2013), provides that the failure
to maintain records as required by Chapter 499 and rules adopted pursuant to Chapter
499, is unlawtul.
72. Respondent received repackaged Lucentis from Eastern without the
documentation required by Rule 61N-1.012, Florida Administrative Code.
73. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Section 499.005(18), Florida
Statutes (2012-2013), by failing to maintain records as required by Rule 61N-1.012,
Florida Administrative Code
13
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests an order imposing the following
penalties: administrative fines and such other and further relief as is provided by law.
Dated this | ( day of _\ i Ly 2015.
KEN LAWSON, SECRETARY
BY:
1940 No Monroe Street, Suite 26A
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1047
Telephone: (850) 717-1800
Facsimile: (850) 414-8240
Prepared by: Wed
Kathryn E. Phi \
Assistant Gene ounsel
Department of Business & Professional Regulation
Division of Drugs, Devices and Cosmetics
1940 North Monroe Street, Suite 26A
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1047
14
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Respondent has the right to request a hearing to be conducted in
accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, to be represented
by counsel or other qualified representative, to present evidence and argument,
to call and cross-examine witnesses and to have subpoena and subpoena duces
tecum issued on his or her behalf if a hearing is requested.
15
Docket for Case No: 15-004719PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Aug. 25, 2016 |
Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding the one-volume Transcript to the agency.
|
Aug. 12, 2016 |
Transcript of Proceedings (not available for viewing) filed. |
Mar. 11, 2016 |
Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding Respondent's Exhibits R-A through R-H, which were received into evidence, along with exhibits not received into evidence to Respondent.
|
Mar. 08, 2016 |
Order Closing Files and Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
|
Mar. 08, 2016 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Mar. 04, 2016 |
Notice of Case Status filed.
|
Feb. 26, 2016 |
Notice of Case Status filed.
|
Feb. 19, 2016 |
Notice of Case Status filed.
|
Feb. 12, 2016 |
Order Placing Cases in Abeyance (parties to advise status by February 19, 2016).
|
Feb. 11, 2016 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to date not certain. |
Feb. 10, 2016 |
Notice of Compliance to Order Granting Motion to Appear by Telephone filed.
|
Feb. 10, 2016 |
Order Allowing Testimony by Telephone.
|
Feb. 10, 2016 |
Respondents' Objection and Response to Non-Party Motion to Appear by Telephone filed.
|
Feb. 10, 2016 |
Petitioner's Third Motion for Official Recognition filed.
|
Feb. 09, 2016 |
Notice of Petitioner's Response to Non-party Motion to Appear by Telephone filed.
|
Feb. 09, 2016 |
Amended Motion to Appear by Telephone filed.
|
Feb. 09, 2016 |
Motion to Appear by Telephone filed.
|
Feb. 08, 2016 |
Respondents' Response to Non-party's Motion to Confirm Day and Time of Telephonic Appearance at Final Hearing filed.
|
Feb. 08, 2016 |
Petitioner's Amended Exhibit List filed.
|
Feb. 05, 2016 |
Motion to Confirm Day and Time of Telephonic Appearance at Final Hearing (filed in Case No. 15-004720).
|
Feb. 03, 2016 |
Respondents, Salomon Melgen, M.D. and Vitreo-Retinal Consultants of the Palm Beaches, P.A.'s Second Amended Exhibit List filed.
|
Feb. 02, 2016 |
Petitioner's Second Motion for Official Recognition filed.
|
Jan. 26, 2016 |
Notice of Compliance to Order Granting Motion to Appear by Telephone filed.
|
Jan. 15, 2016 |
Respondent's Response to Petitioner's Objection to Respondent's Amended Exhibit List filed.
|
Jan. 14, 2016 |
Notice of Petitioner's Objection to Respondents' Amended Exhibit List filed.
|
Jan. 13, 2016 |
Order Granting Motion to Appear by Telephone.
|
Jan. 13, 2016 |
Respondents, Salomon Melgen, M.D. and Vitreo-Retinal Consultants of the Palm Beaches, P.A.'s Amended Exhibit List filed.
|
Jan. 13, 2016 |
Respondents' Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Appear by Telephone filed.
|
Jan. 13, 2016 |
Subpoenas Ad Testificandum filed.
|
Jan. 06, 2016 |
Motion to Appear by Telephone (filed in Case No. 15-004720).
|
Jan. 06, 2016 |
Motion to Appear by Telephone filed.
|
Jan. 06, 2016 |
Notice of Appearance (David Spicer) filed.
|
Jan. 06, 2016 |
Notice of Appearance (filed in Case No. 15-004720).
|
Dec. 22, 2015 |
Order Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for February 11 and 12, 2016; 9:00 a.m.; West Palm Beach, FL).
|
Dec. 22, 2015 |
Respondents' Response to Order Canceling Hearing and Request for Available Dates filed.
|
Dec. 18, 2015 |
Order Granting Petitioner`s Motion for Official Recognition.
|
Dec. 18, 2015 |
Order Granting Motion to Amend Administrative Complaint
|
Dec. 18, 2015 |
Petitoner's Unilateral Response to Order Canceling Hearing and Request for Available Dates filed.
|
Dec. 15, 2015 |
Order Denying Protective Order and Motion to Quash Subpoena.
|
Dec. 14, 2015 |
Order Canceling Hearing and Requesting Available Dates (parties to advise status by December 18, 2015).
|
Dec. 11, 2015 |
CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held. |
Dec. 11, 2015 |
Notice of Filing filed.
|
Dec. 11, 2015 |
Respondents' Response to Order to Show Cause filed.
|
Dec. 10, 2015 |
Order to Show Cause.
|
Dec. 09, 2015 |
Petitioner's Notice of Serving Second Amended Responses to Respondent's Request for Interrogatories and Notice of Amendment to Joint Pre-hearing Stipulation filed.
|
Dec. 09, 2015 |
Order Denying Motion to Strike or Continue Hearing.
|
Dec. 09, 2015 |
Special Limited Appearance of Non-party, James Kilbride, and Motion for Protective Order or, in the Alternative, Motion to Quash Subpoena (filed in Case No. 15-004720).
|
Dec. 09, 2015 |
Notice of Appearance (Denise Dawson) (filed in Case No. 15-004720).
|
Dec. 08, 2015 |
Petitioners Motion for Leave to Amend Amended Administrative Complaints filed.
|
Dec. 08, 2015 |
Petitioner's Motion for Official Recognition filed.
|
Dec. 08, 2015 |
Notice of Compliance with Order of Pre-hearing Instructions filed.
|
Dec. 08, 2015 |
Petitioner's Notice of Serving Amended Responses to Respondent's Request for Interrogatories filed.
|
Dec. 07, 2015 |
Joint Prehearing Stipulation filed.
|
Dec. 07, 2015 |
Response to Respondents' Motion to Strike Petitioner's Expert Witness filed.
|
Dec. 03, 2015 |
Respondents' Motion to Strike Petitioner's Newly Disclosed Expert or in the Alternative, Motion to Continue Final Administrative Hearing (filed in Case No. 15-004720).
|
Dec. 03, 2015 |
Respondents' Motion to Strike Petitioner's Newly Disclosed Expert or in the Alternative, Motion to Continue Final Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Dec. 02, 2015 |
Amended Notice of Taking Telephonic Depositions Duces Tecum (of David Laven and Tram Vu) filed.
|
Dec. 02, 2015 |
Amended Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition Duces Tecum (of Mary Mayleben) filed.
|
Dec. 02, 2015 |
Amended Notice of Taking Telephonic Depositions Duces Tecum (of Amy Pistner and Nancy McGowan) filed.
|
Dec. 02, 2015 |
Amended Notice of Taking Telephonic Depositions Duces Tecum (of Dale Howard and Elizabth Alsobrook) filed.
|
Nov. 30, 2015 |
Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition Duces Tecum (of Mary Mayleben) filed.
|
Nov. 30, 2015 |
Notice of Taking Telephonic Depositions Duces Tecum (of David Laven and Tram Vu) filed.
|
Nov. 30, 2015 |
Notice of Taking Telephonic Depositions Duces Tecum (of Amy Pistner and Nancy McGowan) filed.
|
Nov. 30, 2015 |
Notice of Taking Telephonic Depositions Duces Tecum (of Dale Howard and Elizabeth Renee Alsobrook) filed.
|
Nov. 30, 2015 |
Order Denying Respondents` Motion for Summary Final Order and Memorandum of Law.
|
Nov. 25, 2015 |
Petitioner's Response to Respondents' Motion for Summary Final Order and Memorandum of Law filed.
|
Nov. 25, 2015 |
Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for December 16 and 17, 2015; 9:00 a.m.; West Palm Beach, FL; amended as to hearing dates).
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Ad Testificandum (to Kaoud A. Zayed) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Ad Testificandum (to Jim Kilbride) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Ad Testificandum (to Paul Juez) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Ad Testificandum (to Bonnie Illsley) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (to Ruth Kim) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (to Robert Jernigan) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (to Richard Walchle) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (to Michael Tollon) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (to Megan Gumke) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (to Leslie Cartmill) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (to Diane Kim) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (to Ethan Stegman) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (to Ann Schmitz) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (to Carla Norris) filed.
|
Nov. 23, 2015 |
Amended Notice of Taking Deposition Duce Tecum (of Leslie Cartmill) filed.
|
Nov. 20, 2015 |
Petitioner's Amended Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition of Expert Witness filed.
|
Nov. 20, 2015 |
Petitioner's Amended Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition (of Laura Manteau) filed.
|
Nov. 20, 2015 |
Petitioner's Amended Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition (of Paul Juez) filed.
|
Nov. 20, 2015 |
Petitioner's Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition of Expert Witness filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Subpoena for Deposition (to Ann Schmitz) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Subpoena for Deposition (to Diane Kim) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Subpoena for Deposition (to Ruth Kim) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Subpoena for Deposition (to Megan Gumke) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Subpoena for Deposition (to Richard Walchle) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Notice of Taking Depositions Duces Tecum (of Richard Walchle, Megan Gumke, Ruth Kim, and Diane Kim) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Respondent's Motion for Summary Final Order and Memorandum of Law filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Respondent's Motion for Summary Final Order and Memorandum of Law (filed in Case No. 15-004720).
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Subpoena for Deposition (to Michael Tollon) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (of Michael Tollon) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Subpoena for Deposition (to Robert Jernigan) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (of Robert Jernigan) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Subpoena for Deposition (to Ethan Stegman) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Notice of Taking Depositions Duces Tecum (of Ethan Stegman) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Subpoena for Deposition (to Leslie Cartmill) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Subpoena for Deposition (to Carla Norris) filed.
|
Nov. 19, 2015 |
Notice of Taking Depositions Duces Tecum (of Leslie Cartmill and Carla Norris) filed.
|
Nov. 16, 2015 |
Petitioner's Objection to Respondents' Witness List, Expert Witness List, and Exhibit List and Request for Prehearing Conference filed.
|
Nov. 13, 2015 |
Respondents Response to Petitioners Second Request for Production filed.
|
Nov. 13, 2015 |
Witness List filed.
|
Nov. 13, 2015 |
Exhibit List filed.
|
Nov. 13, 2015 |
Expert Witness List filed.
|
Nov. 12, 2015 |
Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition - P. Juez filed.
|
Nov. 12, 2015 |
Petitioners Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition- L. Manteau filed.
|
Oct. 26, 2015 |
Notice of Serving Petitioner's 2nd Request for Production filed.
|
Oct. 23, 2015 |
Notice of Filing Petitioner's Amended Response to Respondent's Interrogatories to Petitioner filed.
|
Oct. 19, 2015 |
Petitioner's Second Amended Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition (James Kilbride) filed.
|
Oct. 09, 2015 |
Notice of Filing Petitioners Response to Respondents Interrogatories to Petitioner, Expert Witness Interrogatories, and Expert Witness Request for Production filed.
|
Oct. 06, 2015 |
Petitioner's Amended Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition (of James Kilbride) filed.
|
Oct. 02, 2015 |
Petitioner's Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition (of James Kilbride) filed.
|
Oct. 01, 2015 |
Notice of Taking Depositions Duces Tecum (of Reginald Dixon, Denean Merritts, and Lidia Steel) filed.
|
Sep. 30, 2015 |
Notice of Filing Jurat Page (filed in Case No. 15-004720).
|
Sep. 30, 2015 |
Notice of Filing Jurat Page (filed in Case No. 15-004720).
|
Sep. 24, 2015 |
Response to Request for Production filed.
|
Sep. 24, 2015 |
Response to Request for Admissions filed.
|
Sep. 24, 2015 |
Unverified Answers to Interrogatories (filed in Case No. 15-004720).
|
Sep. 24, 2015 |
Unverified Answers to Interrogatories filed.
|
Sep. 23, 2015 |
Order Denying Motion to Dismiss.
|
Sep. 18, 2015 |
Petitioner's Response to Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Administrative Complaints filed.
|
Sep. 17, 2015 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for December 14 through 18, 2015; 9:00 a.m.; West Palm Beach, FL).
|
Sep. 16, 2015 |
Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 15-4719PL and 15-4720).
|
Sep. 15, 2015 |
Order Denying Motion to Abate.
|
Sep. 15, 2015 |
Order Denying Motions to Shorten Time.
|
Sep. 11, 2015 |
Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Sep. 11, 2015 |
Respondent's Amended Motion to Continue Hearing filed.
|
Sep. 11, 2015 |
Notice of Telephonic Case Status Conference (status conference set for September 14, 2015; 1:00 p.m.).
|
Sep. 10, 2015 |
Petitioner's Request for Case Status Conference filed.
|
Sep. 09, 2015 |
Notice of Filing Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Request for Production filed.
|
Sep. 09, 2015 |
Respondent's Motion to Continue Hearing filed.
|
Sep. 09, 2015 |
Respondent's Interrogatories to Petitioner filed.
|
Sep. 09, 2015 |
Respondent's Expert Witness Request for Production filed.
|
Sep. 09, 2015 |
Respondent's Expert Witness Interrogatories filed.
|
Sep. 09, 2015 |
Respondent's Motion to Shorten Time filed.
|
Sep. 09, 2015 |
Respondent's Request for Hearing Involving Disputed Issues of Material Fact Contained in the Amended Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Sep. 03, 2015 |
Respondent's Motion to Shorten Time filed.
|
Sep. 03, 2015 |
Respondent's Request for Production filed.
|
Sep. 03, 2015 |
(Respondent's) Motion to Stay/Abate Administrative Proceeding filed.
|
Sep. 03, 2015 |
(Respondent's) Motion to Consolidate filed.
|
Sep. 03, 2015 |
Order Granting Motion to Amend Administrative Complaint.
|
Sep. 01, 2015 |
(Petitioner's) Motion for Leave to Amend Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Sep. 01, 2015 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Sep. 01, 2015 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 12 through 16, 2015; 9:00 a.m.; West Palm Beach, FL).
|
Aug. 27, 2015 |
(Respondent's) Unilateral Compliance with Initial Order filed.
|
Aug. 27, 2015 |
Petitioner's Unilateral Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Aug. 25, 2015 |
Notice of Serving Petitioner's First Requests for Admission, First Request for Interrogatories, and First Request for Production filed.
|
Aug. 20, 2015 |
Initial Order.
|
Aug. 20, 2015 |
Notice of Appearance of Co-Counsel (filed by Beth Miller).
|
Aug. 20, 2015 |
Notice of Appearance (Kathryn Price).
|
Aug. 20, 2015 |
Respondent's Request for Hearing Involving Disputed Issues of Material Fact filed.
|
Aug. 20, 2015 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Aug. 20, 2015 |
Agency referral filed.
|
|
CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held. |
|
CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held. |
|
CASE STATUS: Motion Hearing Held. |