Petitioner: OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
Respondent: ARFAN M. FAROOQI, D/B/A SHORT AND QUICK STOP FOOD MART AND ARFAN M. FAROOQI
Judges: D. R. ALEXANDER
Agency: Office of Financial Regulation
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Dec. 07, 2015
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, January 4, 2016.
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2024
.
FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
www.FLOFR.com
DREW J. BREAKSPEAR
COMMISSIONER
FLoRiD>
October 27, 2015
FEDEX TRACKING NUMBER
7TA8 3555 8978
Arfan M. Faroogi
7401 E Broadway Ave
Tampa, FL 33619
Re: ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT WITH NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Dear Arfan M. Faroogqi,
As you know, our office conducted an examination of Arfan M. Farooqi D/B/A Short & Quick Stop Food
Mart in relation to its activities pursuant to its Part III Money Services Business license with the Office of
Financial Regulation (the Office). The findings were detailed within our Report of Examination, which
was previously provided to you on or about November 17, 2014.
As a result of these findings, the Division of Consumer Finance has referred your case to me for legal
action. Consequently, accompanying this correspondence please find and carefully review our
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT WITH NOTICE OF RIGHTS, which fully details the discovered
violations.
As explained within the Notice of Rights that accompanies the Administrative Complaint, if you wish to
contest the findings or actions sought by the Office, you may request a hearing by filing a written Petition
for Hearing. Such petition must be in the form specified and must also be received by the Office within
twenty-one (21) days from the date you first received the complaint or the Office will take action as
authorized by Chapter 560, Florida Statutes.
If you have any question or concerns, or if you might like to discuss these matters, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Ss lm
Jenny Salvia
Assistant General Counsel
Florida Office of Financial Regulation
Sincerely,
Enclosure: Administrative Complaint
Election of Proceedings
Settlement Stipulation
1313 NORTH TAMPA STREET, SUITE615 TAMPA, FL 33602-3394 OrFice: (813) 218-5308 FAX: (813) 272-3752
STATE OF FLORIDA
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
IN RE: Administrative Proceeding Docket
Number: 57692
ARFAN M. FAROOQI (a money services business),
D/B/A SHORT & QUICK STOP FOOD MART and
ARFAN M. FAROOQI (personally)
Respondents.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
The State of Florida, Office of Financial Regulation, (“Office”) and files this
Administrative Complaint against ARFAN M. FAROOQI (a money services business),
D/B/A SHORT & QUICK STOP FOOD MART and ARFAN M. FAROOQI (personally)
(together known as “Respondents”), alleging:
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
1. Pursuant to sections 560.105 and 560.109, Florida Statutes, the Office is charged
with administering and enforcing the provisions of Chapter 560, Florida Statutes, and conducting
examinations and investigations to determine whether any provision of Chapter 560, Florida
Statutes, has been violated.
2. Pursuant to section 560.114(1)(a), Florida Statutes, failure to comply with any
provision of Chapter 560, Florida Statutes, or related rule constitutes grounds for disciplinary
action.
3. Atall times material, Arfan M. Farooqi d/b/a Short & Quick Stop Food Mart have
been a Part III Money Transmitter licensee pursuant to Chapter 560, Florida Statutes, and
specifically a “money services business,” as defined in section 560.103(22), Florida Statutes,
Administrative Proceeding Docket Number 57692
Administrative Complaint
Page | of 10
having been issued license number FT30900152. On October 6, 2014, Respondents submitted
an application to terminate their license.
4. At all times material, Respondents’ address of record is and has been 4929 E.
Broadway Ave. Tampa, Florida 33605. The sole owner and compliance officer is Arfan M.
Faroogi.
5. On August 14, 2014, the Office conducted an examination (#54360) of
Respondents’ business records for the time period of July 1, 2013 through July 31, 2014,
(“examination period”).
6. Pursuant to Rule 69V-560.1000(150), Florida Administrative Code, the range for
an “A” level fine is between $1,000 and $3,500; and pursuant to Rule 69V-560.1000(151),
Florida Administrative Code, the range for an “A” suspension is 3 to 10 days.
7. Pursuant to Rule 69V-560.1000(150), Florida Administrative Code, the range for
a “B” level fine is between $3,500 and $7,500; and, pursuant to Rule 69V-560.1000(151),
Florida Administrative Code, the range for a “B” suspension is 10 to 20 days.
COUNT I
8. The above general allegations are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference
as if fully stated herein.
9. Asa part of the examination, the Office reviewed records of payment instruments
exceeding $1,000 that were presented to Respondents for negotiation or payment specifically
including records of customer thumbprints.
10. Section 560.310(2)(c), Florida Statutes, requires check cashers to collect and
maintain original customer thumbprints on checks cashed that exceeded $1,000.
Administrative Proceeding Docket Number 57692
Administrative Complaint
Page 2 of 10
11. Rule 69V-560.704(4)(a), Florida Administrative Code, provides that the check
casher shall affix an original thumbprint of the conductor, at the time of acceptance, to the
original of each payment instrument exceeding $1,000 accepted.
12. Sixty-four (64) payment instruments over $1,000 were reviewed, of which all
sixty-four (64) lacked the required corresponding thumbprint affixed to the payment instruments.
13. Respondents violated section 560.310(2)(c), Florida Statutes, and Rule 69V-
560.704(4)(a), Florida Administrative Code, by failing to collect and maintain original customer
thumbprints on checks cashed that exceeded $1,000.
14. Pursuant to Rule 69V-560.1000(97), Florida Administrative Code, a licensee cited
for failing to maintain a thumbprint of the customer, taken by the licensee, for a payment
instrument accepted having a face value of $1,000 or more, for the first time is subject to a “B”
fine and a “B” suspension.
15. Therefore, the Office is seeking an administrative fine of $7,500.
COUNT IT
16. The above general allegations are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference
as if fully stated herein.
17. During the examination period, Respondents cashed payment instruments.
18. Section 560.309(2), Florida Statutes, requires that when licensees cash payment
instruments, they endorse them with their legal name at the time of acceptance.
19. Rule 69V-560.704(2)(a), Florida Administrative Code, requires check cashers
maintain records that include a copy of payment instruments accepted and endorsed.
20. Respondents failed to maintain records of payment instruments accepted and
endorsed, in violation of section 560.309(2), Florida Statutes and Rule 69V-560.704(2)(a),
Administrative Proceeding Docket Number 57692
Administrative Complaint
Page 3 of 10
Florida Administrative Code.
21. Pursuant to Rule 69V-560.1000(84), Florida Administrative Code, a licensee cited
for the first time for failing to endorse payment instruments with its legal name is subject to a
“B” fine and a “B” suspension.
22. Therefore, the Office is seeking an administrative fine of $6,900.
COUNT Il
23. The above general allegations are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference
as if fully stated herein.
24. As a part of the examination, the Office reviewed records of payment instruments
exceeding $1,000 that were presented to Respondents for negotiation or payment, specifically
including customer files.
25. Three (3) corporate files were reviewed, and all three (3) of the files reviewed
were deficient in some of the required information relative to customer files associated with
presentment or negotiation of corporate checks.
26. Pursuant to section 560.310(2)(a), Florida Statutes, a licensee is required to
maintain customer files, as prescribed by rule, on all customers who cash corporate payment
instruments that exceed $1,000.
27. Rule 69V-560.704(4)(d), Florida Administrative Code, provides that, in addition
to other required records, the check casher shall create and maintain a customer file of each
entity listed as the payee on corporate payment instruments and third party payment instruments
accepted by the licensee, and shall include the specified required information.
28. Pursuant to Rule 69V-560.1000(95), Florida Administrative Code, a licensee
Administrative Proceeding Docket Number 57692
Administrative Complaint
Page 4 of 10
cited for failure to maintain customer files on all customers who cash corporate or third-party
payment instruments exceeding $1,000, as a required by paragraph 69V-560.704(4)(d), Florida
Statutes, for the first time is subject to a “B” fine and a “B” suspension.
29. Therefore, pursuant to section 560.310, Florida Statutes and Rule 69V-560.704,
Florida Administrative Code, the Office is seeking an administrative fine of $6,700.
COUNT IV
30. The above general allegations are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference
as if fully stated herein.
31. During the examination period, Respondents cashed payment instruments
exceeding $1,000.
32. Pursuant to section 560.310(2)(b)', Florida Statutes, if a payment instrument
cashed exceeds $1,000, additional information such as a copy of the personal identification that
bears a photograph of the customer used as identification and presented by the customer, must be
maintained or submitted. Acceptable personal identification is limited to a valid driver license, a
state identification card, a United States Government Resident Alien Identification Card, a
passport or a United States Military identification card.
33. Rule 69V-560.704(4)(c), Florida Administrative Code, states that “the check
casher shall secure and maintain a legible copy of the personal identification, as defined by
Section 560.310(1)(b) 1., F.S., presented by conductor at the time of acceptance.”
34. Respondents failed to secure and maintain a copy of acceptable personal
identifications for all payment instruments cashed exceeding $1,000.
35. Pursuant to Rule 69V-560.1000(96), Florida Administrative Code, a licensee cited
for the first time for failing to maintain a copy of the personal identification presented by the
' Formerly 560.310(1)(b)1, Florida Statutes and amended in 2012 to section 560.310(2)(b), Florida Statutes.
Administrative Proceeding Docket Number 57692
Administrative Complaint
Page 5 of 10
customer for a payment instrument accepted having a face value of $1,000 or more is subject to a
“B” fine and a “B” suspension.
36. Therefore, the Office is seeking an administrative fine of $5,600.
COUNT V
37. The above general allegations are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference
as if fully stated herein.
38. Pursuant to section 560.1235(2), Florida Statutes, a licensee must maintain an
anti-money laundering program (“AML program”) in accordance with 31 C.F.R. s. 1022.210.
39. 31 CFR s. 1022.210, requires regular independent review of the AML program be
conducted by a qualified person other than the compliance officer.
40. Respondents were unable to provide documentation of an Independent Review of
the AML program since 2009, therefore Respondents failed to maintain and review its AML
program to ensure its effectiveness, in violation of section 560.1235, Florida Statute.
41. Pursuant to Rule 69V-560.1000(44), Florida Administrative Code, a licensee cited
for the first time for violation of section 560.1235(2), Florida Statutes, is subject to an “A” fine
and an “A” suspension or revocation.
42. Therefore, the Office is seeking an administrative fine of $1,600.
COUNT VI
43. The above general allegations are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference
as if fully stated herein.
44. Pursuant to section 560.309(8)(a), Florida Statute, a check casher may not charge
fees, except as otherwise provided in section 560.309(8), Florida Statute, in excess of 5 percent
of the face amount of the payment instrument, or $5, whichever is greater.
Administrative Proceeding Docket Number 57692
Administrative Complaint
Page 6 of 10
45.In the instance of some corporate checks cashed by Respondents within the
examination period, Respondents charged check cashing fees in excess of 5%, in violation of
section 560.309(8)(a), Florida Statutes.
46. Pursuant to Rule 69V-560.1000(90), Florida Administrative Code, a licensee cited
for the first time for violation of section 560.309(8)(a), Florida Statutes, is subject to an “A” fine
and restitution.
47. Therefore, the Office is seeking an administrative fine of $1,100.
COUNT VII
48. The above general allegations are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference
as if fully stated herein.
49. Pursuant to section 560.128(1), Florida Statutes, a money services business must
provide each customer with a toll-free telephone number for the purpose of contacting the money
services business.
50. During the on-site portion of the examination it was observed that Respondents
failed to post the toll-free telephone number of the money services business or in the alternative
the Office of Financial Regulation.
51. Pursuant to Rule 69V-560.1000(54), Florida Administrative Code, a licensee cited
for the first time for violation of section 560.128(1), Florida Statutes, is subject to an “A” fine.
52. Therefore, the Office is seeking an administrative fine of $1,000.
COUNT VII
53. The above general allegations are hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference
as if fully stated herein.
54. Pursuant to section 560.126(2), Florida Statutes, a licensee is required to report
Administrative Proceeding Docket Number 57692
Administrative Complaint
Page 7 of 10
any change in an initial license application form within 30 days after the change is effective.
55. Form OFR-560-01, which is incorporated by reference in Rule 69V-
560.1012(1)(a), Florida Administrative Code, requires license applicants to list every bank
account through which registered activities are or will be conducted.
56. In its initial application in 2007, Respondents listed bank accounts with
Mercantile Bank and First Commercial Bank of Tampa to be used for its registered activity.
57. Respondents later changed the bank used for its registered money services
business activity, without notifying the Office.
58. In violation of 560.126(2), Florida Statutes, Respondents failed to report a change
from the initial application.
59. Pursuant to Rule 69V-560.1000(52), Florida Administrative Code, a licensee cited
for the first time for violation of section 560.126(2), Florida Statues, is subject to an “A” fine.
60. Therefore, the Office is seeking an administrative fine of $1,000.
WHEREFORE, Respondents, ARFAN M. FAROOQI, are hereby notified that the
Office intends to enter an Order imposing an administrative fine of $31,400.
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
The licensee is entitled to be represented by counsel or other qualified representative.
The licensee also has the right to request a hearing pursuant to sections 120.569 and
120.57, Florida Statutes. Such request must comply with Rules 28-106.2015 and 28-106.104,
Florida Administrative Code. An Election of Proceeding form is attached for your convenience.
Any such request must be filed as follows:
Administrative Proceeding Docket Number 57692
Administrative Complaint
Page 8 of 10
By Mail or Fax OR By Hand Delivery
Office of Financial Regulation Office of Financial Regulation
P.O. Box 8050 General Counsel’s Office
Tallahassee, FL 32314-8050 The Fletcher Building, Suite 118
Phone: (850) 410-9987 101 East Gaines Street
Fax: (850) 410-9914 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0379
Phone: (850) 410-9987
TO PRESERVE THE RIGHT TO A HEARING, A WRITTEN RESPONSE MUST BE
FILED WITH THE OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
(21) DAYS AFTER THE RECEIPT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. SAID
RESPONSE MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M. ON
THE TWENTY-FIRST DAY AFTER THE RECEIPT OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE
COMPLAINT. A FAILURE TO TIMELY RESPOND IN WRITING WILL
CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF THE LICENSEE’S RIGHT TO REQUEST A HEARING
AND A FINAL ORDER MAY BE ENTERED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE.
You may not make an oral request for an administrative hearing. With regard to a written
request, if you fail to follow the outlined procedure, your request may be dismissed. Any request
for an administrative proceeding received prior to the date of this notice is deemed abandoned
and to be considered, must be timely renewed in compliance with the procedure set forth above.
Administrative Proceeding Docket Number 57692
Administrative Complaint
Page 9 of 10
Mediation of this matter pursuant to section 120.573, Florida Statutes, is not available.
DATED and SIGNED this oll i of Ochs her- ; 20f.
oIMCE 0,
DREW J. BREAKSPEAR
Commissioner
nie
e alvia
Assistant General Counsel
Office of Financial Regulation
Fla. Bar No. 0055319
1313 N. Tampa Street, Suite 615
Tampa, FL 33602-3328
(813) 218-5308
Jenny.Salvia@flofr.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Administrative
Complaint has been furnished by FedEX to ARFAN M. FAROOQI at 7401 E. Broadway Ave.
Tampa, Florida 33619 this o?/’day of (Ocf:_, 20/9.
Administrative Proceeding Docket Number 57692
Administrative Complaint
Page 10 of 10
To: Page 1 of 13 2015-11-17 22:03:07 (GMT) 18663683029 From: James H Sutton Jr
FAX COVER SHEET
TO
COMPANY
FAXNUMBER 18504109914
FROM James H Sutton Jr
DATE 2015-11-17 22:02:22 GMT
RE Arfan Faroogi - Administrative Proceeding Docket No.: 57692
COVER MESSAGE
To Whom it May Concern:
Attached is the Election of Proceeding for the above referenced licensee along with the
Response to the Administrative Complaint. Please direct any questions to the
undersigned counsel for the Respondents.
A hard copy is also being mailed.
Best regards,
Matthew R. Parker, Esq., Associate
Moffa, Gainor, & Sutton, P.A.
Office: (813) 775-2132
Fax: (866) 388-3029
Mobile: (813) 785-4778
Email:
MatthewParker@FloridaSalesTax.com
8875 Hidden River Pkwy, Suite 300
Tampa, FL. 33637
hittp-/Awww.F loridaSalesTax.com
([MGS-logo_180x139] [FTM_115x56]
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Please note that the views expressed herein or in any
attachments hereto are not intended to constitute a "reliance opinion" under applicable
Treasury Regulations, and accordingly are not intended or written to be used, and may
not be used or relied upon, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties that may
be imposed by the Intemal Revenue Service, or (ii) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s) and may
containinformationthatisconfidential, proprietary, attorney work-product or attorney-
WWW.MYFAX.COM
To: Page 2of13 2015-11-17 22:03:07 (GMT) 18663683029 From: James H Sutton Jr
client privileged. If this information is received by anyone other than the named
addressee(s), the recipient should immediately notify the sender by E-MAIL
MatthewParker@FloridaSalesTax.com,
and by telephone (813) 775-2132 and obtain instructions as to the disposal of the
transmitted material. In no event shall this material be read, used, copied, reproduced,
stored or retained by anyone other than the named addressee(s), except with the
express consent of the sender or the named addressee(s).
WWW.MYFAX.COM
Page 3 of 13 2015-11-17 22:03:07 (GMT) 18663883029 From: James H Sutton Jr
To. Page 4 of 13 2015-11-17 22:03:07 (GMT) _ 18663883029 From: James H Sutton Jr
sear eiaa
Docket for Case No: 15-006896
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Jan. 04, 2016 |
Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
|
Jan. 04, 2016 |
Unopposed Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
|
Dec. 23, 2015 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Dec. 23, 2015 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for February 12, 2016; 9:00 a.m.; Tampa and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Dec. 22, 2015 |
Notice of Petitioner's Request for First Set of Admissions filed.
|
Dec. 22, 2015 |
Notice of Petitioner's First Request for Interrogatories filed.
|
Dec. 22, 2015 |
Notice of Petitioner's First Request for Production filed.
|
Dec. 15, 2015 |
Petitioner's Response to the Initial Order filed.
|
Dec. 08, 2015 |
Initial Order.
|
Dec. 07, 2015 |
Power of Attorney/Letter of Authorization filed.
|
Dec. 07, 2015 |
Response and Request for Formal Administrative Proceeding filed.
|
Dec. 07, 2015 |
Election of Proceeding filed.
|
Dec. 07, 2015 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Dec. 07, 2015 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|