Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY
Respondent: JACK ANDREW CLINE, D.D.S.
Judges: F. SCOTT BOYD
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Lauderdale Lakes, Florida
Filed: Aug. 25, 2016
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, September 20, 2016.
Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
BOARD OF DENTISTRY
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
PETITIONER,
v. CASENO: 2011-17614
JACK ANDREW CLINE, D.D.S.,
RESPONDENT.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its
undersigned counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint before the
Board of Dentistry against Respondent, Jack Andrew Cline, D.D.S., and in
support thereof alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state department charged with regulating the
practice of dentistry pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida Statutes; Chapter
456, Florida Statutes; and Chapter 466, Florida Statutes.
2. At all times material to this Complaint, Respondent was a
licensed dentist within the State of Florida, having been issued license
number DN 8037.
3. | Respondent's address of record is 654 Via Verona, Deerfield
Beach, Florida 33442.
4. The Department has reason to believe that Respondent may
also be located at 560 N. U.S. Highway 27/441, Lady Lake, Florida 32159.
5. The minimum standard of performance in diagnosis and
treatment in the practice of dentistry requires a dentist to verify the fit and
seal of permanent restorations such as crowns before seating the
restoration.
6. | When preparing a tooth for a dental restoration such as a
crown, a dentist may perform a “core build-up” by using filling material to
supplement the tooth structure if it has been compromised by breakage or
decay.
7. Once the tooth has been prepared, the dentist will take an
impression of the prepared tooth for fabrication of the permanent crown.
The dentist will then seat a temporary crown on the tooth using temporary
dental cement.
8. Once the permanent crown has been fabricated from the
impression, the dentist will try the crown on the patient, verify the fit of
the crown, and make any necessary adjustments.
9. Next, the dentist will seat the crown on the prepared tooth
using permanent cement.
10. On or about March 31, 2011, Patient D.P. presented to
Respondent's practice for the delivery and cementation of permanent
crowns for teeth numbers seven (7), eight (8), nine (9), and ten (10).
11. Respondent seated Patient D.P’s crowns using permanent
cement.
12. After seating the crowns, Respondent applied flowable
composite resin at the lingual margins of the crowns.
13. The minimum standard of performance in diagnosis and
treatment in the practice of dentistry requires a dentist to adequately
assess and correct permanent restorations such as crowns once the fit and
seal has been compromised.
14. The permanent crowns Respondent provided to Patient D.P. had
one or more of the following clinically observable deficiencies:
A. Poor contours;
B. — Excessive ledging;
C. Inadequate embrasure spaces; and/or
D. Marginal discrepancies.
15. At no time did Respondent correct any of the above clinically
observable deficiencies.
16. The minimum standard of performance in diagnosis and
treatment in the practice of dentistry requires a dentist to properly position
the margin of a permanent restoration such as a crown on adequate tooth
structure.
17. Respondent positioned the margins of the permanent crowns
for Patient D.P’s teeth numbers eight (8) and nine (9) on the core build-up
material used to prepare the teeth for the crowns.
18. Section 466.028(1)(x), Florida Statutes (2010), states in
relevant part that being guilty of incompetence or negligence by failing to
meet the minimum standards of performance in diagnosis and treatment
when measured against generally prevailing peer performance shall
constitute grounds for disciplinary action by the Board of Dentistry.
19. Respondent violated Section 466.028(1)(x), Florida Statutes, in
one or more of the following ways:
| A. By failing to verify the fit and seal of Patient D.P’s
permanent crowns before seating;
B. By failing to adequately assess and correct Patient D.P’s
permanent crowns once the fit and seal had been
compromised; and/or
C. By failing to properly position the margin of the permanent
crowns on Patient D.P’s teeth numbers eight (8) and nine
(9).
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board of
Dentistry enter an order imposing one or more of the following penalties:
restriction of practice, imposition of an administrative fine, issuance of a
reprimand, placement of Respondent on probation, corrective action,
refund of fees billed or collected, remedial education and/or any other relief
that the Board deems appropriate.
SIGNED this #5" day of Aeplemntery _ 2014.
John H. Armstrong, MD, FACS
Surgeon General & Secretary
Bridget K. McDonnell
Assistant General Counsel
DOH Prosecution Services Unit
FILED 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C-65
DEPARTMEN cle Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3265
Florida Bar #99874
CER De TEL: 850.245.4444, FAX: 850.245.4681
Express Mail Address:
2585 Merchants Row, Suite 105
Email: Bridget.McDonnell@flhealth.gov
PCP: September 19, 2014
PCP Members: L.B., T.T., W.R.
DOH v. Jack Andrew Cline, D.D.S,, Case # 2011-17614
5
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Respondent has the right to request a hearing to be
conducted in accordance with Section 120.569 and 120.57,
Florida Statutes, to be represented by counsel or other qualified
representative, to present evidence and argument, to call and
cross-examine witnesses and to have subpoena and subpoena
duces tecum issued on his or her behalf if a hearing is requested.
NOTICE REGARDING ASSESSMENT OF COSTS
Respondent is placed on notice that Petitioner has incurred
costs related to the investigation and prosecution of this matter.
Pursuant to Section 456.072(4), Florida Statutes, the Board shall
assess costs related to the investigation and prosecution of a
disciplinary matter, which may include attorney hours and costs,
on the Respondent in addition to any other discipline imposed.
DOH v. Jack Andrew Cline, D.D.S., Case # 2011-17614
Docket for Case No: 16-004949PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Sep. 20, 2016 |
Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
|
Sep. 16, 2016 |
Joint Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction Without Prejudice filed.
|
Sep. 09, 2016 |
Notice of Serving Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories, First Set of Requests for Production, and First Requests for Admission to Respondent filed.
|
Sep. 07, 2016 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Sep. 07, 2016 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for November 1, 2016; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Sep. 06, 2016 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Aug. 26, 2016 |
Initial Order.
|
Aug. 25, 2016 |
Answer to Administrative Complaint and Request to Appear under Rule 28-106.106, Uniform Rules of Procedure filed.
|
Aug. 25, 2016 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Aug. 25, 2016 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Aug. 25, 2016 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Aug. 25, 2016 |
Notice of Appearance as Co-Counsel (Candace A. Rochester) filed.
|