Filed: Jan. 15, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 15, 2008 No. 07-12237 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00340-CR-J-25-TEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN ROSARIO PEREZ, a.k.a. Rosario Perez, a.k.a. Elio Almendarez-Munguia, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 15, 2008) Before EDMOND
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JAN 15, 2008 No. 07-12237 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 06-00340-CR-J-25-TEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN ROSARIO PEREZ, a.k.a. Rosario Perez, a.k.a. Elio Almendarez-Munguia, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 15, 2008) Before EDMONDS..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JAN 15, 2008
No. 07-12237 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 06-00340-CR-J-25-TEM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN ROSARIO PEREZ,
a.k.a. Rosario Perez,
a.k.a. Elio Almendarez-Munguia,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(January 15, 2008)
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charles L. Truncale, Esq., appointed counsel for Juan Rosario Perez, has
filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals counsel’s assessment of the relative
merit of the appeal is correct. Independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Perez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2