Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Baca v. Colorado Department of State, 18-1173 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 18-1173 Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 01, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT October 1, 2020 _ Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court MICHEAL BACA; POLLY BACA; ROBERT NEMANICH, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. No. 18-1173 (D.C. No. 1:17-CV-01937-WYD-NYW) COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF (D. Colorado) STATE, Defendant - Appellee. - INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE; DAVID G. POST; DEREK T. MULLER; MICHAEL L. ROSIN; ROBERT M. HARDAWAY, Professor of Law, University of Denver Sturm College of Law; C
More
                                                                                 FILED
                                                                     United States Court of Appeals
                       UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                        Tenth Circuit

                             FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                         October 1, 2020
                         _________________________________
                                                                        Christopher M. Wolpert
                                                                            Clerk of Court
 MICHEAL BACA; POLLY BACA;
 ROBERT NEMANICH,

       Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.                                                          No. 18-1173
                                               (D.C. No. 1:17-CV-01937-WYD-NYW)
 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF                                     (D. Colorado)
 STATE,

        Defendant - Appellee.
 ------------------------------

 INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE;
 DAVID G. POST; DEREK T. MULLER;
 MICHAEL L. ROSIN; ROBERT M.
 HARDAWAY, Professor of Law,
 University of Denver Sturm College of
 Law; COLORADO REPUBLICAN
 COMMITTEE,

       Amici Curiae.
                            _________________________________

                                 ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
                             ________________________________

Before BRISCOE, HOLMES, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.
                    ________________________________

       This matter is remanded to the district court with instructions to conduct any

further proceedings that may be necessary in light of the Supreme Court’s decisions


       *
        This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines
of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. But it may be cited for its
persuasive value. See Fed. R. App. P. 32.1; 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
in Colorado Department of State v. Micheal Baca, et al., 
140 S. Ct. 2316
(2020)

(mem.) (per curiam), and Chiafolo, et al. v. Washington, 
140 S. Ct. 2316
(2020).

      The Clerk shall issue the mandate forthwith.

                                                 Entered for the Court


                                                 Carolyn B. McHugh
                                                 Circuit Judge




                                          2


Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer