Filed: Sep. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-14844 Date Filed: 09/04/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-14844 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00080-KD-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TARAS HODIVSKY, JR., a.k.a. Taras Hodivsky, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (September 4, 2020) Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The
Summary: Case: 19-14844 Date Filed: 09/04/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-14844 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00080-KD-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TARAS HODIVSKY, JR., a.k.a. Taras Hodivsky, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (September 4, 2020) Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The G..
More
Case: 19-14844 Date Filed: 09/04/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-14844
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00080-KD-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TARAS HODIVSKY, JR.,
a.k.a. Taras Hodivsky,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(September 4, 2020)
Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver
in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d
Case: 19-14844 Date Filed: 09/04/2020 Page: 2 of 2
1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was
made knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Grinard-Henry,
399 F.3d
1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the
right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error).
2