Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Daniel Wygant, 20-10697 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 20-10697 Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2020
Summary: USCA11 Case: 20-10697 Date Filed: 10/21/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 20-10697 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00231-SDM-JSS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DANIEL WYGANT, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 21, 2020) Before JILL PRYOR, LUCK and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 20-106
More
        USCA11 Case: 20-10697    Date Filed: 10/21/2020    Page: 1 of 2



                                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 20-10697
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00231-SDM-JSS-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                                  versus

DANIEL WYGANT,

                                                          Defendant - Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                            (October 21, 2020)

Before JILL PRYOR, LUCK and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
          USCA11 Case: 20-10697      Date Filed: 10/21/2020   Page: 2 of 2



      Thomas A Burns, appointed counsel for Daniel Wygant in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Wygant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2


Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer