Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

David Kirkwood v. Financial West Investment, 19-2231 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 19-2231 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2231 DAVID KIRKWOOD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FINANCIAL WEST INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., d/b/a Financial West Group; CAPITAL SYNERGY PARTNERS, INC., Defendants - Appellees, and FINANCIAL WEST GROUP, INC., Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:17-cv-02005-CCB) Submitted: July 29, 2020 Decided: August 6, 2020 Before KEENAN, WYNN,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2231 DAVID KIRKWOOD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FINANCIAL WEST INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., d/b/a Financial West Group; CAPITAL SYNERGY PARTNERS, INC., Defendants - Appellees, and FINANCIAL WEST GROUP, INC., Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:17-cv-02005-CCB) Submitted: July 29, 2020 Decided: August 6, 2020 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas C. Costello, COSTELLO LAW GROUP, Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. Brandon S. Reif, Marc S. Ehrlich, REIF LAW GROUP, P.C., Los Angeles, California, Edward S. Zusman, Kevin K. Eng, MARKUN ZUSMAN FRENIERE & COMPTON LLP, San Francisco, California, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: David Kirkwood appeals the district court’s orders granting Capital Synergy Partners motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and Financial West Investment’s motion to compel arbitration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kirkwood v. Fin. West. Inv., No. 1:17-cv-02005-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 17, 2017; Oct. 3, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer