Filed: Jul. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1558 THOMAS JOSE RODRIQUEZ BATTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, and WILLIAM H. YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL CHISOCOV; ELI LILLY PHAMEUTEOCAL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:20-cv-00021-JLK) Submitted: July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020 Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unp
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1558 THOMAS JOSE RODRIQUEZ BATTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, and WILLIAM H. YOUNG, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL CHISOCOV; ELI LILLY PHAMEUTEOCAL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:20-cv-00021-JLK) Submitted: July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020 Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpu..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1558
THOMAS JOSE RODRIQUEZ BATTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
WILLIAM H. YOUNG,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL CHISOCOV; ELI LILLY PHAMEUTEOCAL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:20-cv-00021-JLK)
Submitted: July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Jose Rodriquez Battle, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Jose Rodriquez Battle appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice his civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2018). * We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Battle v. Chisocov, No. 4:20-cv-00021-JLK (W.D. Va. May 5, 2020). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
*
The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is a final, appealable decision; the
court gave Battle the opportunity to amend his complaint and, moreover, “there is nothing
in the opinion indicating that the deficiencies could be corrected by improved pleading.”
Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC,
959 F.3d 605, 611 (4th Cir. 2020).
2