Filed: Jul. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6244 JERMAINE ANTWAN TART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHAPLAIN HOVIS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:17-ct-03252-BO) Submitted: June 26, 2020 Decided: July 6, 2020 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jermaine Antwan T
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6244 JERMAINE ANTWAN TART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHAPLAIN HOVIS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:17-ct-03252-BO) Submitted: June 26, 2020 Decided: July 6, 2020 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jermaine Antwan Ta..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6244
JERMAINE ANTWAN TART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHAPLAIN HOVIS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:17-ct-03252-BO)
Submitted: June 26, 2020 Decided: July 6, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jermaine Antwan Tart, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jermaine Antwan Tart appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2018) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust available administrative
remedies, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (2018).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Tart v. Hovis, No. 5:17-ct-03252-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan.
28, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2