Filed: Aug. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6293 DORSEY LOUIS BOOKER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden FCI-II, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-hc-02287-D) Submitted: August 4, 2020 Decided: August 17, 2020 Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6293 DORSEY LOUIS BOOKER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden FCI-II, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-hc-02287-D) Submitted: August 4, 2020 Decided: August 17, 2020 Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opin..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6293
DORSEY LOUIS BOOKER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden FCI-II,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-hc-02287-D)
Submitted: August 4, 2020 Decided: August 17, 2020
Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dorsey Louis Booker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dorsey Louis Booker, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See
Booker v. Andrews, No. 5:18-hc-02287-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 2020); see also United States
v. Dodge,
963 F.3d 379, 384-85 (4th Cir. 2020). We deny a certificate of appealability as
unnecessary. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2